Originally Posted by smashhell
However the impressive thing about the M135 is that it cost $10k less than the 1M while being able to achieve similar performance.
Seems that what we said about the 1M and M3....
But between the 1M and M135, if these cars are so close in performance it amazes me that a month ago a driver took the M135 to Nordschleife and drove 8:05 BtG on a wet track and the official 1M time with it's pro driver took 8:14 on a dry track? Did the 1M drive a different route or was the M135 so much better or was the M135 driver so much better?