View Single Post
      08-15-2008, 11:35 PM   #1
wtzouris
Private First Class
United_States
4
Rep
112
Posts

Drives: 2014 328d xDrive Sports Wagon
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: New York, NY

iTrader: (0)

Nokian Hakkapeliitta 5 vs. Bridgestone Blizzak WS-60

I live on a steep hill in New York. I am very concerned about climbing the hill in ice/snow. I also have a Toyota Sienna LE (FWD) on whcih I use steel wheels/WS-60 Blizzaks. They are really really good and I can always get up the hill. They ride squishy but I don't care. They feel really really safe.

I know there is a huge price difference between the tires below, but in the 16" size (128i convertible) wheels, the tire size is 205/55 R16 all around: ( I have a 128i coupe but I am swapping my standard 17" tire/wheel package for a 16" tire/wheel package from a Convertible 128i)

Nokian has two choices: (One of them is runflat!)
Link:
https://www.tiresbyweb.com/p-7139-no...eliitta-5.aspx
T443174 205/55R16 94 T XL $172
Quantity

T442490 205/55R16 94 T XL Run Flat (!) $232
Quantity

Bridgestone has one choice in Tube Multicell (non-run flat)
Link:
http://www.tirerack.com/tires/tires....nSpeedRating=H

Bridgestone Blizzak WS-60
(Studless Ice & Snow)
Overview | Specs | Warranty | Reviews | Test Results | Survey Results
Sidewall Style: Blackwall

Size: 205/55R16
Serv. Desc: 91R
Price: $108.00 (each)
Estimated Availability: 09/26/08
Optional Road Hazard Program: additional $12.96 per tire

Which tire do you think has more traction? I am using these sizes on a 128i coupe with convertible 16" wheels. any comments, Gill? Why does Tire Rack not carry Nokian? Are they as good as Blizzaks? Does anyone from Scandinavia have any comments/comparisons?

I realize I can also get the Nokians in 17" sizes, but the Bridgestone only makes the LM-25 in those 17" sizes, not the tube multicell WS-60.

William
Appreciate 0