Quote:
Originally Posted by grimlock
IF you read between the lines, the reviewer is coming at it from an angle of 'How not-bad is the 1M', as if the superiority of the Cayman R is established fact.
Its not a bad first M-car, but there is definite class distinction with the M3.
The shorter wheelbase is something to write home about, the engine is an experiment.
Its different from the M3 for sure, fits the name '1M'.
What's different with this 1M than a hypothetical 135i's'?
|
my god, go back to threads that were started way back when this car was still wearing full camo. it's almost as if every single knock against the 1m in this thread is a direct effort to ignore everything that many other auto journalists and chris have said.
where are these comments coming from? people who have driven this car? or perhaps just people judging from an armchair...or a 3 or 5 series with the smallest, least powerful engine possible.