View Single Post
      08-17-2010, 11:03 PM   #47
bradleyland
TIM YOYO
United_States
1504
Rep
3,283
Posts

Drives: 2013 M3
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Vero Beach, FL

iTrader: (0)

Garage List
Quote:
Originally Posted by SlicktopTTZ View Post
...

Even a stock 135i is relatively slow.
Not to nit pick, but it drives me nuts when people say that. The 135i is relatively slow? Relative to what, and how is it relevant to the conversation? A Ferrari F430 is relatively slow too. Relative to an F1 car. Ok, but how does that make the current discussion any clearer.

The thread starter is talking about a 128i and a 135i. The difference between these two cars is around 70 HP, and the character differences inherent to a turbocharged car versus a N/A car. It's enough of a difference to feel with your butt-dyno, but in your daily commute, I think most people would find it hard to push past what the 128i can deliver while avoiding collecting speeding tickets.

I realize I'm saying this while driving a 135i, but I made my purchase on a relative basis as well. Optioned the way I wanted it, the cost difference between the 128 and the 135 wasn't enough to pass on the extra ponies, and I was coming from a car that was close in performance spec to the 128, so I wanted a bump.
__________________
His: 2019 R1250GS - Black
Hers: 2013 X3 28i - N20 Mineral Silver / Sand Beige / Premium, Tech
Past: 2013 ///M3 - Interlagos Blue Black M-DCT
Past: 2010 135i - TiAg Coral Red 6MT ///M-Sport
Appreciate 0