View Single Post
      01-23-2009, 08:16 AM   #45
ssabripo
HALA MADRID!
ssabripo's Avatar
United_States
939
Rep
2,879
Posts

Drives: camels & donkeys
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Plantation, Fl

iTrader: (7)

Quote:
Originally Posted by jeremyc74 View Post
Not to take away from the numbers he put down, but you're reading too much into it. The 15% driveline loss is a guess, and it's hard to actually prove without doing an engine dyno and then a chassis dyno. On top of that you never know how exact the calibration on the dyno is. The factory numbers are standardized and are adjusted for a specific set of circumstances (temperature, oil level, fuel, altitude, ect.). If you run the car at a lower temperature you're going to see better numbers. In other words, too many variables to say BMW is actually under-rating the cars.

Numbers from a chassis dyno should be used as a tuning tool to demonstrate gain. Trying to derive exact flywheel numbers from them isn't really useful.
you are correct to a certain point. Conversely, if we assume that the 302hp rated power from BMW is the "correct" baseline, then according to these numbers the drive train loss factor is:

273/302 = 0.9
thus
362/0.9 = 402 hp, baselined from a 302hp initial value.
__________________

F87 M2 Competition, Sunset Orange, Exc, DCT.
**SOLD** F80 M3 Mineral Grey/Sakir Orange, Exc, DCT... ED 6/2015
**SOLD**E90 M3, Interlagos Blue / M individual two-tone, ZCP, ZP2, ZCV, DCT, ED.
Appreciate 0