View Single Post
      01-30-2014, 12:17 PM   #64
Obioban
Emperor
Obioban's Avatar
1614
Rep
2,753
Posts

Drives: M3, M3, M5, M5
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: West Chester, PA

iTrader: (0)

Garage List
2008 BMW M5  [0.00]
2017 BMW i3  [0.00]
2005 BMW M3 Coupe  [0.00]
2001 BMW M5  [0.00]
Quote:
Originally Posted by TheAxiom View Post
Bull - I dynoed 3 different intakes back to back, and they all showed distinct gains and changes in the powerband, with no time to "adapt" And he used the 'right' octane: regardless of what the tuner says, the car isn't going to make 15whp less because he used 93 octane instead of 91. It's ridiculous that you would suggest as such just to defend a brand you have no vested interest in...or do you?

Evolve is one step above garbage in my book, and will remain that way until I can see something tangible that justifies the exorbitant price they are offering for their glorified PBX.
So...

AA with secondary cats removed and 93 octane
vs
Evolve with standard catted exhaust and 91 octane

Both make very similar power... and Evolve is crap?

I'll have what you're drinking!
__________________

2005 M3 Coupe, 2004 M3 Wagon, 2001 M5 Sedan, 2008 M5 6MT Sedan, 2012 128i M sport
Appreciate 0