View Single Post
      04-17-2018, 08:06 PM   #160
ajsmithvmi
Professional Hack
United_States
96
Rep
379
Posts

Drives: 2009 135i
Join Date: Dec 2017
Location: St Louis

iTrader: (5)

Quote:
Originally Posted by iminhell1 View Post
Someone earlier in the thread had mentioned the amount of steering input seemed to be too much vs the turn angle. I thought so too. Took me a little to find why, knew I'd read about it before ...

http://www.1addicts.com/forums/attac...6&d=1395978128

From post --> http://www.1addicts.com/forums/showp...2&postcount=23


Basically the high static negative camber is fighting you. To make up for it you naturally go to a stiffer spring, which is actually the opposite of what you want to do. What you actually want to do is reduce static negative camber and go to a softer spring. Allow the camber/toe gain/loss to work.


Let's talk about this for a second. I've noticed it lately on my car as well, running -2.8* up front. Even with an M3 rack, the amount of steering input I need while daily driving is conspicuous. The car seems to handle fine on track.

So, what do I want to do here? Everyone always talks about getting -3* up front, wouldn't that just exacerbate the issue?

Berns, what's your take?
Appreciate 0