View Single Post
      09-29-2011, 04:26 AM   #7
Pete_vB
Captain
Pete_vB's Avatar
United_States
118
Rep
898
Posts

Drives: '69 GT3, GT4, 1M, 912
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: SF Bay Area, Shenzhen, Oman

iTrader: (0)

Quote:
Originally Posted by Fundahl View Post
There have been twin-charged cars, mainly race vehicles. The benefit is the ability to run a large turbo with a high flow rate but without the lag.

You can do it properly with a positive displacement blower that has a clutch to disengage the pulley when the appropriate turbo rpm is reached.
True. But it's non-trivial (understatement) to do well.

As you say, it's generally used to reduce lag, such as:
http://www.greencarcongress.com/2005..._vws_new_.html
But the 1M already has small turbos and not much lag, so it's be a lot of complexity and weight for little gain (which is probably why BMW didn't do it).
Now if you swapped the turbos for larger ones then it might be worthwhile to reduce the lag, but the OP suggested leaving the turbos stock...

Could it be done? Probably yes. Should it be done? Probably no...
__________________
1M, GT4, 1969 Porsche 911 w/ 997 GT3 Cup Motor (435hp & 2,100 lbs)
Appreciate 0