BMW 1 Series Coupe Forum / 1 Series Convertible Forum (1M / tii / 135i / 128i / Coupe / Cabrio / Hatchback) (BMW E82 E88 128i 130i 135i)
 





 

Post Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
      10-11-2012, 12:09 AM   #1
FIRST1
Major
United_States
109
Rep
1,047
Posts

Drives: '15 M235i Melbourne Red
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Long Island, NY

iTrader: (5)

My reflection on 87 Octane (vs. 93)

So my brother thought he was being nice by putting gas in my car, but little did he know that I fill it up with 93... Anyway, I noticed some things here, and was just wondering if others in this situation noticed the same. This is regarding my N54 engine, although I assume the same experience would occur with the N55, could be wrong.

First, I am getting much better mileage! I'm just below a half a tank, with the amount of driving i've done, I should be below a quarter tank! This, apparently is the upside, in my personal experience.

However, performance is compromised, as expected. The torque is just plain slower, and I notice much more lag. It is easily noticeable, since I drive always with 93 in the tank.

IMO having the 93 is a must. If there are people out there not running 93 then you're not realizing the most potential of the car.

Appreciate 0
      10-11-2012, 12:17 AM   #2
HeyMoe53
Captain
63
Rep
671
Posts

Drives: '17 M240 AW/Coral MT
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Central PA

iTrader: (0)

Kudos to your brother for putting gas in the tank!

I can't even imagine putting regular gas into a turbo motor. The engine controls will keep harm from being done (short term), so you could use it in a pinch.

It does handcuff performance, though.

Even my NA 128 is set up for premium gas. Inside the fuel filler door, it does say "91 octane recommended." I haven't used anything else.
Appreciate 1
Olgeezer1173.00
      10-11-2012, 05:48 AM   #3
Bmwbreed
Major
United_States
58
Rep
1,198
Posts

Drives: 2013 BMW 135i
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: Rota Spain (US Forces)

iTrader: (3)

You are getting better mileage because the engine has retarded the timing to compensate for the lower octane. If u really want good gas try sometime mixing a gallon of e85 with regular 87 octane. I used to do this n my turbo a4 and the difference in performance from 91 or 93 was amazing. You have to be careful though because too much e85 will 1 harm your fuel components or 2 make the octane to high and the car will go in limp mode. Basically I would run my tank below a quarter left. Throw n 1 gallon on e85 and then fill up the rest with 87. E85s octane is an average of 106 so when mixed with regular it makes it about 96 or 97 which is like what they have in Europe and Japan and partly why their cars perform better.
Appreciate 0
      10-11-2012, 06:12 AM   #4
splitsecond
Space Admiral
splitsecond's Avatar
United_States
23
Rep
335
Posts

Drives: 135i
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: St. Louis

iTrader: (1)

Garage List
2008 BMW 135i  [0.00]
If you get better gas mileage at the expense of performance, does that suggest that 87 would be good for a long road trip where power isn't a concern? My fuel door says "minimum 89 octane"... so I can't imagine that I'd be damaging my engine if I used that.

On the other hand, if I'm using the "fuel economy" mode on my JB4 tune, the timing is probably already adjusted without needing to change the fuel grade...
__________________
2008 135i Montego Blue sport pkg, premium pkg, Logic 7 sound, iDrive/Nav
Mods completed: JB4+ & FBO || LSD || BMW-P suspension + F/R sway bars || 18" Breyton GTS-R || M3 front bushings || Vogtland camber plates || BMW-P rotors + Stoptech pads |||| Acquired, not installed: BMS WW Meth kit || Logic HVI intake || Mishimoto OCC |||| Shopping for: Summer tires
Appreciate 0
      10-11-2012, 08:25 AM   #5
Walt White Coupe
Captain
Walt White Coupe's Avatar
215
Rep
720
Posts

Drives: 2013 650ix Coupe, 23 C8 Vette
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Phila, PA

iTrader: (0)

First, I am getting much better mileage!

Simply put, No way!
Appreciate 1
BMWCCA12174.50
      10-11-2012, 09:05 AM   #6
germ
Second Lieutenant
59
Rep
231
Posts

Drives: 2008 135i convertible
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: CA

iTrader: (0)

Quote:
Originally Posted by Walt White Coupe View Post
First, I am getting much better mileage!

Simply put, No way!
Agreed. Lots of misinformation. There is no difference in energy content between different octane grades, so I don't believe there will be differences in mileage.
Appreciate 0
      10-11-2012, 11:25 AM   #7
Stohlen
Major
64
Rep
1,267
Posts

Drives: AW 135i
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Waterford, Mi

iTrader: (2)

Garage List
2008 BMW 135i  [5.66]
Quote:
Originally Posted by germ View Post
Agreed. Lots of misinformation. There is no difference in energy content between different octane grades, so I don't believe there will be differences in mileage.
Premium fuel gets better gas milage because the higher octane allows the engine to advance timing because it doesn't see knock as early. This inproves the efficiency of the engine and equates for slightly better gas milage as a result, tho it is not much, maybe 1 mpg if that. Likely the OP is just seeing a random sample that is higher than his average.
Appreciate 0
      10-11-2012, 11:44 AM   #8
FIRST1
Major
United_States
109
Rep
1,047
Posts

Drives: '15 M235i Melbourne Red
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Long Island, NY

iTrader: (5)

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bmwbreed View Post
You are getting better mileage because the engine has retarded the timing to compensate for the lower octane. If u really want good gas try sometime mixing a gallon of e85 with regular 87 octane. I used to do this n my turbo a4 and the difference in performance from 91 or 93 was amazing. You have to be careful though because too much e85 will 1 harm your fuel components or 2 make the octane to high and the car will go in limp mode. Basically I would run my tank below a quarter left. Throw n 1 gallon on e85 and then fill up the rest with 87. E85s octane is an average of 106 so when mixed with regular it makes it about 96 or 97 which is like what they have in Europe and Japan and partly why their cars perform better.
^Thanks for the info!


Quote:
Originally Posted by germ View Post
Agreed. Lots of misinformation. There is no difference in energy content between different octane grades, so I don't believe there will be differences in mileage.
^It's not misinformation. I'm not telling you that you'll get better mileage. I'm simply telling you that this is what I experienced. I've been pushing the engine harder, to try to get rid of this gasoline, lol, and it won't disappear like it usually does.
Appreciate 0
      10-11-2012, 01:27 PM   #9
Stohlen
Major
64
Rep
1,267
Posts

Drives: AW 135i
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Waterford, Mi

iTrader: (2)

Garage List
2008 BMW 135i  [5.66]
Quote:
Originally Posted by FIRST1 View Post
^Thanks for the info!
That info's not 100% correct tho. Retarding the timing across the board makes the engine less efficient. The same amount of fuel is injected, it is just burned at a different, less efficient time. Equaling worse gas mileage.
Appreciate 0
      10-11-2012, 03:21 PM   #10
Bmwbreed
Major
United_States
58
Rep
1,198
Posts

Drives: 2013 BMW 135i
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: Rota Spain (US Forces)

iTrader: (3)

Quote:
Originally Posted by Stohlen
Quote:
Originally Posted by FIRST1 View Post
^Thanks for the info!
That info's not 100% correct tho. Retarding the timing across the board makes the engine less efficient. The same amount of fuel is injected, it is just burned at a different, less efficient time. Equaling worse gas mileage.
Well I'll be the first to admit when I'm wrong so if I am forgive me. But I thought when the timing was slowed so was the rate at which fuel was burned. To put it simply a more powerful engine needs more fuel and if you aren't operating at 100% power capacity then it may burn a bit longer. Not necessarily more efficent because its not creating as much power as it could. But I've been wrong before so if I am my apologies. It always felt like tho the few times I had no choice but to use crappy gas in my a4 (premium is limited n north dakota this why we mixed e85 at times) it lasted forever. IDK.
__________________

2013 BMW 135i Alpine white/coral red JB4 stage 2/ AFE stage 2 sealed intake box/ VRSF 3.5 inch catless dp/ Dinan exhaust/ Alpine V3 6000k HID angel eyes/ JB speed AW rear lip spoiler/ OEM mud flaps. ER charge pipe/ VRSF 7 inch FMIC forge star CF5s 19x8.5 and 19x9
Appreciate 0
      10-11-2012, 04:17 PM   #11
1ToBeOn2Wheels
Freude am Fahren
United_States
31
Rep
703
Posts

Drives: B9 Audi S5 Coupe
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Sierra Nevada Foothills, California

iTrader: (0)

Quote:
Originally Posted by FIRST1 View Post
IMO having the 93 is a must. If there are people out there not running 93 then you're not realizing the most potential of the car.
We don't get 93 in California, only 91. Oh, and as of today, it's hovering around $5/gal. But thanks for the suggestion.
Appreciate 0
      10-11-2012, 04:42 PM   #12
FIRST1
Major
United_States
109
Rep
1,047
Posts

Drives: '15 M235i Melbourne Red
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Long Island, NY

iTrader: (5)

Quote:
Originally Posted by Stohlen View Post
That info's not 100% correct tho. Retarding the timing across the board makes the engine less efficient. The same amount of fuel is injected, it is just burned at a different, less efficient time. Equaling worse gas mileage.
I was mostly referring to the suggestion of adding a gallon of E85 into the tank. Although, I've found that there's no conveniently located gas stations near me that offer it, so I probably won't be using E85 anytime soon.

In regards to whether or not better fuel consumption is realized with lower octane, it seems like there's too many variables to fully come to a conclusion. It just seems that from my experience with it, I've made a conscious effort to consume more of this 87 octane, yet I still notice an obvious difference in how much gas I have left. In any case, I'm just surprised that there's no research that's been conducted to come to a conclusion on this (if there is, excuse me, b/c I haven't came across it yet.)
Appreciate 0
      10-11-2012, 05:28 PM   #13
Stohlen
Major
64
Rep
1,267
Posts

Drives: AW 135i
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Waterford, Mi

iTrader: (2)

Garage List
2008 BMW 135i  [5.66]
Its a pretty well known fact, theres been load of research over the years. Nothing recent however because it is considered a law of automotive science.

And pushing your car harder on 87 octane to use up gas is a very unwise decision when your car requires premium.
Appreciate 0
      10-11-2012, 06:19 PM   #14
Stohlen
Major
64
Rep
1,267
Posts

Drives: AW 135i
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Waterford, Mi

iTrader: (2)

Garage List
2008 BMW 135i  [5.66]
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bmwbreed View Post
Well I'll be the first to admit when I'm wrong so if I am forgive me. But I thought when the timing was slowed so was the rate at which fuel was burned. To put it simply a more powerful engine needs more fuel and if you aren't operating at 100% power capacity then it may burn a bit longer. Not necessarily more efficent because its not creating as much power as it could. But I've been wrong before so if I am my apologies. It always felt like tho the few times I had no choice but to use crappy gas in my a4 (premium is limited n north dakota this why we mixed e85 at times) it lasted forever. IDK.
Timing isnt slowed, its retarded, which just means the spark happens earlier. The earlier the spark, the further the piston is from top dead center when combustion starts. Which means more pressure builds that the piston must fight as it rises to top dead center, and thus less horsepower per power stroke.

For example: if an engine run with 87 octane makes 100 hp at 50% throttle, firing 10 degrees before top dead center. And that same engine run on 93 octane makes 105 horsepower at 50% throttle, firing 5 degrees before top dead center. Then you could reduce the throttle of the engine when run on 93 octane to 45% and make 100 horsepower and save some gas, while getting the same amount of power as the 87 octane.
Appreciate 1
      10-11-2012, 07:57 PM   #15
Bmwbreed
Major
United_States
58
Rep
1,198
Posts

Drives: 2013 BMW 135i
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: Rota Spain (US Forces)

iTrader: (3)

Quote:
Originally Posted by Stohlen
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bmwbreed View Post
Well I'll be the first to admit when I'm wrong so if I am forgive me. But I thought when the timing was slowed so was the rate at which fuel was burned. To put it simply a more powerful engine needs more fuel and if you aren't operating at 100% power capacity then it may burn a bit longer. Not necessarily more efficent because its not creating as much power as it could. But I've been wrong before so if I am my apologies. It always felt like tho the few times I had no choice but to use crappy gas in my a4 (premium is limited n north dakota this why we mixed e85 at times) it lasted forever. IDK.
Timing isnt slowed, its retarded, which just means the spark happens earlier. The earlier the spark, the further the piston is from top dead center when combustion starts. Which means more pressure builds that the piston must fight as it rises to top dead center, and thus less horsepower per power stroke.

For example: if an engine run with 87 octane makes 100 hp at 50% throttle, firing 10 degrees before top dead center. And that same engine run on 93 octane makes 105 horsepower at 50% throttle, firing 5 degrees before top dead center. Then you could reduce the throttle of the engine when run on 93 octane to 45% and make 100 horsepower and save some gas, while getting the same amount of power as the 87 octane.

I just learned something new. Thanks man. While I know a decent amount I don't know everything.
__________________

2013 BMW 135i Alpine white/coral red JB4 stage 2/ AFE stage 2 sealed intake box/ VRSF 3.5 inch catless dp/ Dinan exhaust/ Alpine V3 6000k HID angel eyes/ JB speed AW rear lip spoiler/ OEM mud flaps. ER charge pipe/ VRSF 7 inch FMIC forge star CF5s 19x8.5 and 19x9
Appreciate 0
      10-11-2012, 08:22 PM   #16
Indo Rider
Captain
533
Rep
725
Posts

Drives: 135
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: United States

iTrader: (0)

Lots of misinformation here... I think Stohlen might be the only person that knows what he's talking about. No offense to anyone, just a warning to not believe everything you see posted on the internet.
Appreciate 0
      10-11-2012, 11:01 PM   #17
bmw1racer
bimmerphile, technogeek
bmw1racer's Avatar
United_States
998
Rep
3,784
Posts

Drives: 2012 E82 6MT Sport
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: SoCal

iTrader: (0)

Garage List
Quote:
Originally Posted by Stohlen View Post
And pushing your car harder on 87 octane to use up gas is a very unwise decision when your car requires premium.
Do any of the engines (N51/N52/N54 et al) have knock sensors?

My old E36 with the M42 engine had multiple knock sensors connected to the engine block...

Just wondering.
__________________
Appreciate 0
      10-12-2012, 12:10 AM   #18
FIRST1
Major
United_States
109
Rep
1,047
Posts

Drives: '15 M235i Melbourne Red
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Long Island, NY

iTrader: (5)

Interesting information here. Glad I brought this up on the forum. Still not convinced that I'm not getting better gas mileage though!
Appreciate 0
      10-12-2012, 03:12 AM   #19
Lester
Brigadier General
295
Rep
3,350
Posts

Drives:
Join Date: Oct 2007

iTrader: (0)

What does your display read? This discussion doesn't have to be subjective.
Attached Images
 
Appreciate 0
      12-04-2022, 10:48 AM   #20
pgk500
Private
29
Rep
94
Posts

Drives: BMW X3
Join Date: Feb 2022
Location: San Diego, CA

iTrader: (0)

Quote:
Originally Posted by FIRST1 View Post
So my brother thought he was being nice by putting gas in my car, but little did he know that I fill it up with 93... Anyway, I noticed some things here, and was just wondering if others in this situation noticed the same. This is regarding my N54 engine, although I assume the same experience would occur with the N55, could be wrong.

First, I am getting much better mileage! I'm just below a half a tank, with the amount of driving i've done, I should be below a quarter tank! This, apparently is the upside, in my personal experience.

However, performance is compromised, as expected. The torque is just plain slower, and I notice much more lag. It is easily noticeable, since I drive always with 93 in the tank.

IMO having the 93 is a must. If there are people out there not running 93 then you're not realizing the most potential of the car.

Have tried both premium and regular felt no difference. No difference in performance or mileage. Been filling 87 octane in 2015 X3 forever.
Appreciate 0
      12-20-2022, 12:06 PM   #21
Fishee
Lieutenant
Fishee's Avatar
945
Rep
449
Posts

Drives: 135i MSport
Join Date: Jan 2022
Location: Toronto

iTrader: (0)

I have noticed the greatest difference in mileage is due to the presence of ethanol.
No ethanol = greater mileage.
I fill up exclusively with 91 octane 0% ethanol - Shell.

Last edited by Fishee; 12-20-2022 at 03:02 PM..
Appreciate 0
      12-20-2022, 01:38 PM   #22
Lester
Brigadier General
295
Rep
3,350
Posts

Drives:
Join Date: Oct 2007

iTrader: (0)

My N54 will let me know every time I put anything but 94 premium with no ethanol.

Last time, within an hour of putting in a half tank of 91 with 10% ethanol the check engine light came on and it idled roughly for a week.

The time before that, same thing.

She has expensive tastes!
Appreciate 0
Post Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:16 PM.




1addicts
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
1Addicts.com, BIMMERPOST.com, E90Post.com, F30Post.com, M3Post.com, ZPost.com, 5Post.com, 6Post.com, 7Post.com, XBimmers.com logo and trademark are properties of BIMMERPOST