|
|
|
08-01-2008, 11:11 PM | #23 |
Private First Class
1
Rep 162
Posts |
Its far better to get colder air into a turbo. Colder = denser makes for more boost at a lower turbine speed so it is easier on the turbo and more efficient. The intercooler is meant to cool the charge after the compression heating in the turbo, not heat picked up from the turbo being hot. So I like the heatshields and ducting
|
Appreciate
0
|
08-01-2008, 11:41 PM | #24 |
Supreme Allied Commander
3847
Rep 54,378
Posts
Drives: F80 M3
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Santa Barbara, AP, Brembo, GIAC, Koni, Ohlins, Performance Friction, www.hpautosport.com
|
|
Appreciate
0
|
08-02-2008, 12:20 AM | #25 |
Private
4
Rep 96
Posts |
Tight looking setup...I'm curious as to how they squeezed out 30 horses from the intake though thats pretty insane.
__________________
MY JET BLACK BMW 135i
Options: ZSP, iPOD, Comfort Access, Heated Seats, Premium Hi-fi Stereo Current Mods: COBB AccessPORT, Riss Racing CDV, Shadowline Grills Upcoming Mods: Window Tint, Quad Exhaust |
Appreciate
0
|
08-02-2008, 01:23 AM | #27 |
Free at last
287
Rep 986
Posts |
how much longer for the RR intake anyway?
|
Appreciate
0
|
08-02-2008, 08:52 AM | #28 |
Unindicted co-conspirator
66
Rep 1,734
Posts
Drives: to work, mostly.
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania / Detroit, Michigan
|
Not trying to flame, but how do you figure that? It looks like the front cone will get fresh (cold) air from the ductwork, but I'm betting that the back one will just be sucking in hot air from the engine and the turbos.... (In fact, since the box isn't closed, the front cone will be bringing in some hot air, too.) Or am I missing something?
|
Appreciate
0
|
08-02-2008, 09:04 AM | #29 |
Private
0
Rep 72
Posts |
What's the point of having a heat shield if it's open to the engine bay? Granted the stock intake ducting is there, but I can't help but think it would be better if it was closer to the wheel well and blocked off from the engine compartment more.
|
Appreciate
0
|
08-02-2008, 11:11 AM | #31 | |
Unindicted co-conspirator
66
Rep 1,734
Posts
Drives: to work, mostly.
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania / Detroit, Michigan
|
Quote:
I'd rather have one cone in a box getting nothing but external air than two getting a mix of outside and inside. (Though I'm sure it sounds fawkin' schweet, if I may say so.) |
|
Appreciate
0
|
08-03-2008, 01:16 AM | #32 |
Brigadier General
167
Rep 4,311
Posts
Drives: Supercharged E90 M3
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: SL,UT
|
who cares!
its SEXY! I WANT IT!
__________________
|
Appreciate
0
|
08-03-2008, 02:07 PM | #33 | |
Alpine White M Performance
37
Rep 252
Posts |
The hood should seal off the intake compartment preventing heat soak.
Ob. Quote:
|
|
Appreciate
0
|
08-03-2008, 03:42 PM | #35 |
Major
54
Rep 1,015
Posts |
Looks very nice .. just a little to pricey for me though ..
Crowley
__________________
The last words on the powerplant should go to a clearly overwhelmed Hormazd Sorabjee, editor and publisher of Autocar India: “There is something simply magical about BMW’s in-line six. It has a creamy smoothness that makes velvet feel like sandpaper.” |
Appreciate
0
|
08-03-2008, 07:06 PM | #36 | |
Unindicted co-conspirator
66
Rep 1,734
Posts
Drives: to work, mostly.
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania / Detroit, Michigan
|
Quote:
Maybe, although it looks like there's a gap in front of the back cone, and of course there isn't a flush seal in front where the ductwork from the grille interfaces with the shield. The cones themselves and the ductwork from the cone to the intake doesn't look like it seals off at all. Probably fine on the track when there's fresh air pouring in, but I'm guessing it'd be less so in stoplight driving. And how would you know for sure if the box is flush against the inside of the hood? |
|
Appreciate
0
|
08-03-2008, 07:14 PM | #38 |
Captain
29
Rep 750
Posts |
Not sure if mentioned... But it looks like the rear filter is not going to get as much air as the front filter. When the roof is down, the top will be sealed off, seems like it will get air only from the left channel and a small amount from whatever passes over the angled part of the front filter.
|
Appreciate
0
|
08-03-2008, 08:37 PM | #39 | |
Donkey Kong King
89
Rep 1,129
Posts |
Quote:
From looking at the design, it is not an "Air Tight" intake, relying on the factory snorkel for air. I don't think there will be an issue with the rear filter drawing in the required air it need.
__________________
[SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]
|
|
Appreciate
0
|
08-04-2008, 07:03 AM | #40 |
Major General
4450
Rep 7,594
Posts
Drives: '19 M2C
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Chicagoland
|
I want to see a few Dyno tests before I jump on the bandwagon. This is too much like a short ram air intake which is prone to heat soak from the engine bay.
:iono:
__________________
www.ReTuneTheDeTune.com
2019 M2 Competition (Sunset Orange) |
Appreciate
0
|
08-04-2008, 09:38 AM | #41 |
Captain
29
Rep 750
Posts |
Well...I don't love the design, and without RAM air..I really thing the back one will have less air than the front. there is very little flow to get back there, and elsewhere, it was mentioned that the shield seals with the hood, so even less for the back one.
|
Appreciate
0
|
08-04-2008, 10:21 AM | #42 |
Major General
4450
Rep 7,594
Posts
Drives: '19 M2C
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Chicagoland
|
Forget keeping your engine bay clean.
__________________
www.ReTuneTheDeTune.com
2019 M2 Competition (Sunset Orange) |
Appreciate
0
|
08-04-2008, 11:39 AM | #44 |
Enthusiast
11
Rep 272
Posts |
it definitely is one sick looking intake, although you are definitely paying the price for what you are receiving in this case, I'm not sure about those power gains though, that seems way too optimistic with just an intake.
|
Appreciate
0
|
Post Reply |
Bookmarks |
|
|