|
|
|
12-09-2010, 07:08 PM | #1 |
First Lieutenant
17
Rep 310
Posts |
135i vs new 5.0...
both with bolt on's....135i: er intercooler, ar dp's, k&n drop in with 93 pump,meth(map 8) vs bolt on 5.0
Last edited by chancejat; 12-11-2010 at 08:35 AM.. |
12-09-2010, 07:27 PM | #2 |
Colonel
381
Rep 2,926
Posts
Drives: Cayman GT4, 135i
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: NJ
|
SICK! did you have drag radials or street tires?
__________________
Current: M2CS
Gone but not forgotten: Cayman GT4, M2C, 2011 135i, E83 X3 6MT, 2016 SO M3, 2012 335iS, 2010 135i and 2006 e90 325xi |
Appreciate
0
|
12-09-2010, 09:24 PM | #4 |
Captain
53
Rep 941
Posts |
damn whos car is that... the 1'er have the dct? or just reg at?
__________________
JB4, DCI, Digi boost, CSL eyelids, 5% tint, KW v2's. Bastuck 85mm quad w/ berk resonated mids, LED int ltg, Perf SSK, CF int trim, 19" SF-71 rims, CDV mod, BMS OCC, ER+tial charge pipe. AR DP's, Helix IC,meth, drilled slotted rotors
|
Appreciate
0
|
12-09-2010, 11:48 PM | #6 |
Colonel
152
Rep 2,757
Posts
Drives: 2017 Audi A4
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Arden, NC
|
Hah sweet. Mustangs all roarin n shit, even got a lil bit of a headstart, 1er still eats him for dinner.
|
Appreciate
0
|
01-24-2011, 10:13 PM | #8 |
M Power
41
Rep 1,469
Posts |
Just goes to show you that MPH at the end is not that important. Lowest ET wins everytime.
__________________
|
Appreciate
0
|
01-25-2011, 06:18 AM | #9 |
Captain
67
Rep 920
Posts |
sure it is, you do just bolt it on in the end, same way no2 is...
The turbo has just enough lag to make launching the 1 easier. Good time for sure. I needed a converter to run those times with my 99 LS1 camaro (back in 00-01). It was running 11.6@115, pulling the wheels off the ground. 4000 converter, headers, exhaust, cold air (lid), maf, 01 intake (car dynoed 330s rwhp)
__________________
16 m4 vert, 18 X6M, 22 Tesla MYP, 21 Plaid, 17 Ram
|
Appreciate
0
|
02-19-2011, 08:29 AM | #11 | |
Second Lieutenant
3
Rep 242
Posts |
Quote:
Anyways that's a nice time for essentially just DPs a tune and meth. Granted, this engine seems to love meth, so he would be in the 12s without it. But he still would've won with DPs and a tune (the filter and the intercooler do not make the car faster). That makes me think: I wonder how close the gain is from race gas (and obv the extra couple pounds it allows you) and no meth to pump gas with meth. With the 5.0s starting to hit the streets in the near future it may be time for me to pull the trigger Grats to the driver :tup: *edit* I just realized the 5.0 was WELL into 4th at the end, probably at or near the top. He also went into 2nd and 3rd very early. Was he short shifting or is that car just geared really tight because its all special edition-y? |
|
Appreciate
0
|
02-27-2011, 09:37 AM | #13 | |
Captain
181
Rep 962
Posts |
Quote:
Nice to see this comparison though. Looks like the cars were a little bit closer than I thought they were. |
|
Appreciate
0
|
02-27-2011, 09:39 AM | #14 |
Captain
181
Rep 962
Posts |
btw you might want to clarify, if you know what the exact bolt ons are for the 5.0. Bolt-ons are very often mis-used.
(even the 135 example, as mentioned before when people talk about bolt-ons, meth is NOT typically consider a bolt-on) |
Appreciate
0
|
04-01-2011, 02:22 PM | #16 |
Sir Boost-a-Lot
18
Rep 519
Posts |
FTW! Just look at the difference with in weight transfer to the rear.
__________________
|
Appreciate
0
|
04-24-2011, 04:24 PM | #18 |
Major
194
Rep 1,457
Posts |
i think this deserved a re-run. mustang chocked. heh
__________________
|
Appreciate
0
|
Post Reply |
Bookmarks |
|
|