|
|
|
09-13-2011, 04:33 AM | #2 |
Colonel
122
Rep 2,695
Posts |
Now swap the GT3 for a Turbo .. a Turbo S ... or a GT2. I mean .. come on! A GTR versus a GT3?
__________________
.-=[ Kenny ]=-. 1999 BMW M Coupe 10.775 @ 134.35 mph w/1.600 60' (Best 136.07 mph) 25th August 2004. +2010 X5 35D+
Check out the 1Addicts Drag Racing Standings and Drag Racing 101. |
Appreciate
0
|
09-13-2011, 04:36 AM | #3 |
Me Boosta
249
Rep 5,721
Posts |
|
Appreciate
0
|
09-13-2011, 04:36 AM | #4 |
Private First Class
18
Rep 164
Posts |
Lol, that was sick dude. Very enjoyable. The 458's exhaust note gave me goose bumps. The 1M was a bit out of its league but still pulled a very respectable time.
|
Appreciate
0
|
09-13-2011, 04:56 AM | #5 |
Banned
88
Rep 3,070
Posts
Drives: A boring one...
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Australia
|
Very cool, thanks for sharing!
|
Appreciate
0
|
09-13-2011, 05:20 AM | #6 |
Brigadier General
210
Rep 3,288
Posts
Drives: anything given a chance
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: .au
|
Wrong Porsche.
|
Appreciate
0
|
09-13-2011, 06:14 AM | #8 |
New Member
0
Rep 7
Posts |
12.9 for the evora is pretty good for a car with a toyota v6.
Would love to see a comparison like that with some tuned exotics: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=V7Yvt5Tz-2c or perhaps: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XioceckTcds Bit of sales hype but insane nonetheless. |
Appreciate
0
|
09-13-2011, 06:45 AM | #10 |
Colonel
122
Rep 2,695
Posts |
__________________
.-=[ Kenny ]=-. 1999 BMW M Coupe 10.775 @ 134.35 mph w/1.600 60' (Best 136.07 mph) 25th August 2004. +2010 X5 35D+
Check out the 1Addicts Drag Racing Standings and Drag Racing 101. |
Appreciate
0
|
09-13-2011, 08:57 AM | #13 |
///Mbassador
26
Rep 1,069
Posts |
That is a stunning launch by the GTR. Imagine what high performance electric cars of possibly only a few years from now will do with instantaneous 100% torque/ power.
From a standinding start the 1M isn't really quick due to too much wheelspin with traction off and too much intervention with traction on, even intermediate traction control. My 335i ( auto ) will easily beat my 1M off the line in day to day driving. It's the in gear acceleration of the 1M that blows you away. If they were to produce an in gear acceleration test at say 80 to 140 in 3rd gear I think there would be a very different result. There was a post where the 1M comprehensively beats cars like the 458 and R8 with in gear acceleration. So don't be dismayed N54 / N55 ers, our cars kick arse in the real world. Including, BTW, the M3 that the original ( troll, not you SBC ) poster runs. |
Appreciate
0
|
09-13-2011, 09:18 AM | #14 |
Lieutenant Colonel
51
Rep 1,792
Posts |
That's a ridiculous choice for a Porsche. A Turbo S would have smoked the GTR and everything else in that run. Hell even a Pana Turbo S would be quicker that GT3RS. Put some corners in, that'd be completely different story.
|
Appreciate
0
|
09-13-2011, 06:04 PM | #15 |
Banned
88
Rep 3,070
Posts
Drives: A boring one...
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Australia
|
I don't get why you guys are stuck up on the Porsche? The test didn't say they wanted to get the fastest cars from each brand? I think the Porsche did pretty well considering it's competition.
|
Appreciate
0
|
09-14-2011, 04:19 AM | #18 |
Colonel
122
Rep 2,695
Posts |
Because if the test had substituted a Turbo, Turbo S or GT2 then the Porsche would have won the competition by over a second.
__________________
.-=[ Kenny ]=-. 1999 BMW M Coupe 10.775 @ 134.35 mph w/1.600 60' (Best 136.07 mph) 25th August 2004. +2010 X5 35D+
Check out the 1Addicts Drag Racing Standings and Drag Racing 101. |
Appreciate
0
|
09-14-2011, 04:31 AM | #19 |
Banned
88
Rep 3,070
Posts
Drives: A boring one...
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Australia
|
I don't think the aim was to find the fastest car down the quarter mile... I think it was more of a "lets get as many fast cars as we can get and race them together". I mean, they had the Cayman R too (why have that at all?)
ps- Which Porsche can do the 1/4mile in 10.2 seconds?! |
Appreciate
0
|
09-14-2011, 05:01 AM | #20 |
Captain
67
Rep 853
Posts |
Because they say it was all in they name of fun but then go on to document the finishing times of all cars as if its some proven truth. If they had the 997 turbo s competing against the 370z, nissan fanboys would be incensed too. Horses for courses as they say.
|
Appreciate
0
|
09-14-2011, 06:16 AM | #22 |
Brigadier General
1282
Rep 4,093
Posts |
Me, I am so stoked that we actually have two of the cars in their 'for fun' test. Not trying to brag but I'm happy as a pig in shit with both.
Oh yeh, I don't care that they were 2nd and 3rd slowest of the lot either hahaha |
Appreciate
0
|
Post Reply |
Bookmarks |
|
|