|
|
|
06-17-2015, 05:22 PM | #1 |
Captain
125
Rep 654
Posts |
Gaining Front Shock Travel
Setup I have FK Coilovers that have Koni shocks. Running stock 18's and I am about 0.25" below stock height I would say. I never track my car, yet I want the best combination for ride + handling. Bumpstops After a long time researching for proper bumpstops and trying many of them, stock non-sport (cut), stock sport cut and E36M/Z4M), I came back to stock sport bump stops (without cutting). I feel like this gives the best "tight + smooth feeling between all above. Front Strut Mounts I have not mess with the camber (though I have M3 front arms), and I do not plan to get camber adjuster plates. When I installed the coilovers, I did put in new oem strut mounts. What I want I want to gain a small amount of shock travel up front without raising the ride-height, or without cutting or changing the front bump stops. I feel like, if BMW made slightly shorter in thickness strut mount/bearing for the front, I would be golden. Why With above mentioned coilovers/bumpstops, I have about 0.25" front shock travel I need. On highway speeds, it bounces around due to lack of shock travel, not matter how I adjust the Koni shock dampening. |
06-17-2015, 05:53 PM | #2 | |
Private First Class
4
Rep 160
Posts |
Quote:
|
|
Appreciate
0
|
06-18-2015, 07:14 AM | #3 |
Brigadier General
827
Rep 3,856
Posts |
Extend the top mounts lol, that'll cost ya. Seen it done to race cars where they want the car lower, but want to retain the amount of travel
|
Appreciate
0
|
06-18-2015, 08:27 AM | #6 |
Major General
4338
Rep 6,196
Posts |
Hmmm.....
http://www.turnermotorsport.com/p-11...ht-e9x-m3.aspx Front Upper Strut/Shock Mount - Left or Right - E9X M3 This item fits the following BMWs: 2011-2012 E82 BMW 1M 2008-2012 E90 BMW M3 - Sedan 2008-2012 E92 BMW M3 - Coupe 2008-2012 E93 BMW M3 - Convertible |
Appreciate
0
|
06-18-2015, 08:29 AM | #7 | |
Captain
125
Rep 654
Posts |
So whats your opinion on this? Won't fit?
Quote:
|
|
Appreciate
0
|
06-18-2015, 08:31 AM | #8 |
Major General
4338
Rep 6,196
Posts |
|
Appreciate
0
|
06-18-2015, 08:33 AM | #9 |
Captain
125
Rep 654
Posts |
Hehe..They would mount on the car fine I would imagine. May be the tunnel where the strut goes through and screws the nut is not tall enough? IF there's a play there, that would not work at all, making the strut rattle
|
Appreciate
0
|
06-18-2015, 08:37 AM | #11 |
Captain
125
Rep 654
Posts |
|
Appreciate
0
|
06-18-2015, 09:05 AM | #14 |
Brigadier General
2410
Rep 3,546
Posts |
Something doesn't sound right - if I understand the first post the car is only 1/4" lower than stock and yet there is only 1/4" total travel available before bottoming out?
*IF* that is true, then it sounds like either the coilovers are awfully designed or there's a serious installation issue. Hopefully I misunderstood. |
Appreciate
0
|
06-18-2015, 09:09 AM | #15 | |
Captain
125
Rep 654
Posts |
Quote:
-¼" Lower in overall height. Yet, I am not using FK given bump stops or E36M bump stops. I am using OEM M-Sport Bump stops. This is the main reason I am lacking shock travel. |
|
Appreciate
0
|
06-18-2015, 12:32 PM | #16 |
First Lieutenant
130
Rep 351
Posts |
I'm reading through this and trying to understand your logic of reducing the mount height in order to increase spring/damper travel. Based on the image you've provided the front coilovers have one primary adjustment (height) and one secondary (spring preload, although this also adjusts height).
By taking a look at the overall height of the stock mount (let's call it 70mm) and the M3 mount (roughly 45mm) you have a delta of 25mm or slightly over 1-inch. By installing initially without making any adjustments from where you are at now you will be approximately 1.25" lower than the stock configuration. In order to get back to your previous height you will need to raise the lower perch by that delta amount and by doing so you will be decreasing the available spring/damper stroke. If your front coils actually had height adjustment separate from preload you would be able to increase spring/damper travel by raising the vehicle by the desired amount of available travel and then lowering with the preload adjustment. Now there's a problem with doing this because first, if your springs are too short to begin with you will run out of adjustment and you will have a loose spring. Second, there usually a predetermined amount of spring preload needed for most coilovers in order for them to operate properly. In short, the height change needs to be at the bottom of the damper rather than the top in order to increase spring/damper travel due to the way it's adjusted in your case. The drawback to this is if you're using the same spring it will essentially be moving the lower perch further down and this will decrease the available clearance between the wheel/tire and lower perch. In order to fix that you would need a shorter spring to position the lower perch back above the tire for maximum clearance. Edit: Before you do anything I would suggest getting the stroke spec from the manufacturer and compare that with your current setup. The should be able to provide you with spec for both the dampers and springs. You might be out of usable adjustment if you start making changes. Oh, and you could always raise the height by .25 and that will give you your increase in travel but I'm guess that's not what you want to do. Edit again: has to had
__________________
Ohlins Road & Track Coilovers / Apex ARC 8's 245/255-35 MPSS / Wagner Downpipes / Wagner EVOII Intercooler / ER Charge Pipe / Forge DV / PowerFlex RSFB / PowerFlex Differential Bushings / MFactory 3.46 Torsion LSD / MHD Flasher
Last edited by E82MSport; 06-18-2015 at 02:07 PM.. |
Appreciate
0
|
06-18-2015, 12:37 PM | #17 |
First Lieutenant
130
Rep 351
Posts |
This is exactly what I've done. Spacers at the bottom of the damper and spacers on top of the camber plates. By doing this I've increase my ride height by 8mm and decreased my spring preload by 12mm, thus gaining more spring/damper travel to avoid engaging the internal bump stop. I'm also running shorter springs.
__________________
Ohlins Road & Track Coilovers / Apex ARC 8's 245/255-35 MPSS / Wagner Downpipes / Wagner EVOII Intercooler / ER Charge Pipe / Forge DV / PowerFlex RSFB / PowerFlex Differential Bushings / MFactory 3.46 Torsion LSD / MHD Flasher
|
Appreciate
0
|
06-18-2015, 01:38 PM | #18 | |
Captain
125
Rep 654
Posts |
Quote:
I believe I only have height adjustment. These are FK Kingsport Coilovers. They have similar design: |
|
Appreciate
0
|
06-18-2015, 02:05 PM | #19 | |
First Lieutenant
130
Rep 351
Posts |
Quote:
Here's an example of a damper that has both height and preload adjustment. For the sake of making things less confusing you only have height adjustment.
__________________
Ohlins Road & Track Coilovers / Apex ARC 8's 245/255-35 MPSS / Wagner Downpipes / Wagner EVOII Intercooler / ER Charge Pipe / Forge DV / PowerFlex RSFB / PowerFlex Differential Bushings / MFactory 3.46 Torsion LSD / MHD Flasher
|
|
Appreciate
0
|
06-18-2015, 02:07 PM | #20 |
Captain
125
Rep 654
Posts |
Oh understood. Yea, I kind of regret my choice on these coilovers I have. I will elaborate more on the next post.
|
Appreciate
0
|
06-18-2015, 02:48 PM | #21 |
Brigadier General
827
Rep 3,856
Posts |
I missed this when I first read your post. So when you hit a bump on the highway, you are bouncing a little bit afterwards? So that would mean your dampers are not able to control the energy of the springs effectively. Turning up the rebound should help them do this. But you are saying the adjustments aren't helping at all? I am curious to know the spring rates.
|
Appreciate
0
|
06-18-2015, 03:07 PM | #22 | |
Captain
125
Rep 654
Posts |
Quote:
|
|
Appreciate
0
|
Post Reply |
Bookmarks |
|
|