11-09-2016, 01:42 PM | #23 | |||
Driven Crazy
190
Rep 505
Posts |
Quote:
Quote:
Only about 14,000 944S2s were made (944 production eclipsed 1 series coupes). I owned three of them. All had less than 75,000 when they left my ownership. They were not collectibles and appreciated recently only because of the rising tide of 911 values. A Ferrari Dino was the red hair bastard stepchild Ferrari for decades. As recently as about 2007 they were not much more than nice old cars barely/not even worth the cost of restoration. Will the 1M value stabilize like a 944S2 (I paid $8500 for a mint 54k mile example in 2005, recently a 35k mile example was advertised for $19500 asking price. Where was the DJIA?), or will it spike like a Dino in forty years? Since the 1M is based off a production car like the 944 was I would go with the first 944S2 and buy it to drive, and value it based on the work recently done/work needed, and not try to figure where it will be in 2050. Quote:
As for the manual transmission - Be glad you weren't speculating in 1974 or 1976. You would have a garage full of Corvette and Eldorado convertibles.
__________________
'08 128i 6M
Last edited by Tommm; 11-09-2016 at 01:56 PM.. |
|||
Appreciate
0
|
11-09-2016, 03:54 PM | #24 |
Lieutenant Colonel
912
Rep 1,850
Posts |
Sure. A used 1M will need maintenance no matter the mileage so if you're OK with that there's no reason not to consider one with 120K. The motor doesn't have a very high mean piston speed or anything that makes it likely to require a rebuild before its time. You can probably get over 200K easy with replacing the usual ancillary bits. Also, you don't (usually) put 120K miles on a car like the 1M when you're out driving it super hard and taking it to track days so those are probably pretty easy miles where the owner was just crusing.
|
Appreciate
0
|
Post Reply |
Bookmarks |
|
|