And you thought the E92 M3 was faster

mjp · 05-31-2011, 01:17 AM

Pretty impressive for a stock car. I had two runs, 4.8 and 4.7 0-100km.

Car Specs
Car : 2011 BMW 135i
Transmission : DCT
Fuel : BP 95 RON (91 equivalent)
Wheels : 19inch VMR wheels
Engine mods: NONE

Runs were done at 2000m above sea level.

Sylon · 05-31-2011, 01:19 AM

Kinda hard to see the numbers there.

mjp · 05-31-2011, 01:21 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sylon

Kinda hard to see the numbers there.

4.7 seconds 0-100km time

BBK · 05-31-2011, 02:54 AM

Are they that accurate though?

cooler2442 · 05-31-2011, 02:58 AM

Sorry, don't think its accurate. If you can provide us with time slips from a drag strip then we would believe you. There is no chance you have a 0-60 of 2.3 seconds.

adrean8j · 05-31-2011, 03:15 AM

Its kilometers per hour...so 0-100km/h = 0-62mph

BrokenVert · 05-31-2011, 07:38 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by cooler2442

There is no chance you have a 0-60 of 2.3 seconds.

Classic american

bogart · 05-31-2011, 08:25 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by cooler2442

Sorry, don't think its accurate. If you can provide us with time slips from a drag strip then we would believe you. There is no chance you have a 0-60 of 2.3 seconds.

haha

bogart · 05-31-2011, 08:29 AM

Nice!!! So, intake, tune, exhaust... I bet I'm running about 4.5

RnmEvo9 · 05-31-2011, 08:49 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by mjp

Pretty impressive for a stock car. I had two runs, 4.8 and 4.7 0-100km.

Car Specs
Car : 2011 BMW 135i
Transmission : DCT
Fuel : BP 95 RON (91 equivalent)
Wheels : 19inch VMR wheels
Engine mods: NONE

Runs were done at 2000m above sea level.

I don't know how accurate those numbers are but I know for a fact that your elevation affects n/a vehicles much more than boosted cars.

And not in a good way either.

onefastman · 05-31-2011, 09:04 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by cooler2442

Sorry, don't think its accurate. If you can provide us with time slips from a drag strip then we would believe you. There is no chance you have a 0-60 of 2.3 seconds.

FAIL

Jk

1on135_deal · 05-31-2011, 09:06 AM

with a tune and muffler delete berk i can hang with a m3 till 140mph then m3 is gone. In fact around 80 i gain 2 car lengths.

adrean8j · 05-31-2011, 09:11 AM

^^^You are not hanging with a M3 until 140mph....its possible two car lengths but he missed a shift or slow shifted to be two car lengths. The 135i/1M power band and torque kills the M3 until about 5000rpm in all gears...but after that it is lights out to the M3 due to the bigger displacement engine AND higher redline...

1speedbike · 06-03-2011, 08:50 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by adrean8j

^^^You are not hanging with a M3 until 140mph....its possible two car lengths but he missed a shift or slow shifted to be two car lengths. The 135i/1M power band and torque kills the M3 until about 5000rpm in all gears...but after that it is lights out to the M3 due to the bigger displacement engine AND higher redline...

^That

M3 is much stronger at the limit, near the top of the power band and at high speeds. 135i is much stronger in the middle of the power band and at low to moderate speeds.

As for OP..

Great numbers! Not far off from what a lot of magazines tested as the stock 0-60 times (around 4.8 sec).

Is it totally stock, including the tires?

Dackelone · 06-03-2011, 08:57 PM

I don't know. In my informal "autobahn testing" - a stock 135i is darn close to a M3 all the way up to 140-ish (mph). It pretyy much depends on who gets on teh gas first as to who's in front. Maybe I just ran across a bunch of weenie M3's so far. I really would like to see what a real race would be like though.

cooler2442 · 06-03-2011, 09:04 PM

Lol didn't see the kmh.

adrean8j · 06-04-2011, 12:45 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dackelone

I don't know. In my informal "autobahn testing" - a stock 135i is darn close to a M3 all the way up to 140-ish (mph). It pretyy much depends on who gets on teh gas first as to who's in front. Maybe I just ran across a bunch of weenie M3's so far. I really would like to see what a real race would be like though.

Yeah ok I might be able to believe that...but no way he was 2 car lengths ahead and pulling.....

RnmEvo9 · 06-04-2011, 09:07 AM

I'll say it again, elevation affects n/a cars much more than forced induced cars.

SiN55 · 06-04-2011, 10:35 AM

C'mon man, you know this is impossible!

Lee123 · 06-04-2011, 03:58 PM

Great time. I'm curious how you did it. Did you use launch control? If so, did you hold it until the flag showed up or start at a lower RPM? If not, how did you start to get that time. I'm not questioning the accuracy, I'm just looking for some advice. Thanks.

AWD2RWD · 06-05-2011, 04:17 AM

IDK what you guys aren't believing but 4.7 0-60 is what Car and Driver reported. That is the stock number. However, an M3 is 0-60 in 4.0 or less, so IDK why the fuck people think they are the same stock vs stock, thats a massive difference.

Although 135 + JB3 + AFE intake + powerful axleback has to be faster than M3, people are reporting 1/4 times of faster than M3's reported stock 12.9 on just those simple mods.... unless I am mistaken.

Brian135i · 06-05-2011, 04:44 AM

A stock M3 0-60mph is not 4.0 or less. Try about 4.4-4.7 seconds.

05-31-2011, 01:17 AM	#1
mjp Private First Class 24 Rep 131 Posts Drives: 135i Join Date: Feb 2011 Location: in my 135i iTrader: (0)	And you thought the E92 M3 was faster Pretty impressive for a stock car. I had two runs, 4.8 and 4.7 0-100km. Car Specs Car : 2011 BMW 135i Transmission : DCT Fuel : BP 95 RON (91 equivalent) Wheels : 19inch VMR wheels Engine mods: NONE Runs were done at 2000m above sea level.
	Appreciate 0 Tweet Quote

05-31-2011, 01:19 AM	#2
Sylon Brigadier General 189 Rep 3,435 Posts Drives: 2011 135i, SG/CR, 6MT, M-Sport Join Date: Apr 2010 Location: Michigan / Ohio iTrader: (0) Garage List 2011 135i [9.20]	Kinda hard to see the numbers there. __________________ 2011 BMW 135i \| Space Gray \| ///M-Sport \| BMW CCA #450291 Facebook / Instagram / YouTube / Twitter
	Appreciate 0 Quote

05-31-2011, 02:54 AM	#4
BBK Banned 87 Rep 3,070 Posts Drives: A boring one... Join Date: Oct 2008 Location: Australia iTrader: (0) Garage List 2009 BMW 135i [5.76]	Are they that accurate though?
	Appreciate 0 Quote

05-31-2011, 02:58 AM	#5
cooler2442 Brigadier General 477 Rep 4,153 Posts Drives: 1/18 Monte Carlo Blue E92 M3 Join Date: Apr 2011 Location: Los Angeles iTrader: (6) Garage List 2016 Porsche GT4 [0.00]	Sorry, don't think its accurate. If you can provide us with time slips from a drag strip then we would believe you. There is no chance you have a 0-60 of 2.3 seconds.
	Appreciate 0 Quote

05-31-2011, 08:29 AM	#9
bogart Lieutenant Colonel 116 Rep 1,664 Posts Drives: E82 N55 DCT Join Date: Nov 2010 Location: STL, MO iTrader: (4) Garage List 2011 BMW 135i [7.06]	Nice!!! So, intake, tune, exhaust... I bet I'm running about 4.5 __________________
	Appreciate 0 Quote

05-31-2011, 09:06 AM	#12
1on135_deal First Lieutenant 18 Rep 347 Posts Drives: 2011 135i Join Date: Dec 2010 Location: NY iTrader: (0)	with a tune and muffler delete berk i can hang with a m3 till 140mph then m3 is gone. In fact around 80 i gain 2 car lengths. __________________ "you blink I shift" DCT
	Appreciate 0 Quote

06-03-2011, 08:57 PM	#15
Dackelone European Editor 10523 Rep 22,992 Posts Drives: N54 e82 Join Date: Feb 2010 Location: Bayern, Germany iTrader: (1)	I don't know. In my informal "autobahn testing" - a stock 135i is darn close to a M3 all the way up to 140-ish (mph). It pretyy much depends on who gets on teh gas first as to who's in front. Maybe I just ran across a bunch of weenie M3's so far. I really would like to see what a real race would be like though.
	Appreciate 0 Quote

06-03-2011, 09:04 PM	#16
cooler2442 Brigadier General 477 Rep 4,153 Posts Drives: 1/18 Monte Carlo Blue E92 M3 Join Date: Apr 2011 Location: Los Angeles iTrader: (6) Garage List 2016 Porsche GT4 [0.00]	Lol didn't see the kmh.
	Appreciate 0 Quote

06-04-2011, 09:07 AM	#18
RnmEvo9 Banned 247 Rep 1,827 Posts Drives: 2007 335i Join Date: Apr 2011 Location: Pembroke Pines, FL iTrader: (2)	I'll say it again, elevation affects n/a cars much more than forced induced cars.
	Appreciate 0 Quote

06-04-2011, 10:35 AM	#19
SiN55 Second Lieutenant 10 Rep 262 Posts Drives: 135i N55 Join Date: May 2010 Location: Croatia iTrader: (0)	C'mon man, you know this is impossible!
	Appreciate 0 Quote

06-04-2011, 03:58 PM	#20
Lee123 Private First Class 10 Rep 110 Posts Drives: 2011 135i DCT Convertible Join Date: Sep 2010 Location: Phoenix, AZ iTrader: (0)	Great time. I'm curious how you did it. Did you use launch control? If so, did you hold it until the flag showed up or start at a lower RPM? If not, how did you start to get that time. I'm not questioning the accuracy, I'm just looking for some advice. Thanks.
	Appreciate 0 Quote

06-05-2011, 04:17 AM	#21
AWD2RWD AWD to RWD 8 Rep 135 Posts Drives: Lancer Evolution 9 MR Join Date: May 2011 Location: California iTrader: (0)	IDK what you guys aren't believing but 4.7 0-60 is what Car and Driver reported. That is the stock number. However, an M3 is 0-60 in 4.0 or less, so IDK why the fuck people think they are the same stock vs stock, thats a massive difference. Although 135 + JB3 + AFE intake + powerful axleback has to be faster than M3, people are reporting 1/4 times of faster than M3's reported stock 12.9 on just those simple mods.... unless I am mistaken.
	Appreciate 0 Quote

06-05-2011, 04:44 AM	#22
Brian135i Lieutenant 49 Rep 469 Posts Drives: BMW 16' M3 Join Date: Aug 2009 Location: Oxnard, CA iTrader: (1) Garage List 2009 BMW 135i [0.00]	A stock M3 0-60mph is not 4.0 or less. Try about 4.4-4.7 seconds.
	Appreciate 0 Quote

Thread Tools	Search this Thread
Show Printable Version Email this Page	Search this Thread: Advanced Search