|
|
|
|
Post Reply |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
05-15-2010, 01:56 AM | #1 |
Gold Member
161
Rep 512
Posts |
Car & Driver: 2011 135i DCT First Drive Review - 4.6s / 13.2s (estimated)
2011 BMW 135i DCT - First Drive Review
A dual-clutch automated manual brings virility to BMW’s potent 135i. BY STEVE SILER May 2010 BMW’s 135i coupe and convertible may not look much different for 2011, but with a new turbocharged inline-six engine and a newly available dual-clutch automated manual transmission, the 2011 135i certainly feels different. We came to this conclusion following our first opportunity to sample the new 135i on the roads around New Jersey Motorsports Park, as well as on its “Lightning” track, during BMW’s recent 2011 model rollout. On paper, the differences are slight. Cosmetic and interior changes are more or less limited to reshuffled option packages. While the single-turbo N55 replaces the award-winning N54 twin-turbo motor in all 135s, its output figures are technically the same as those of the N54: 300 hp and 300 lb-ft of torque, with peak torque now occurring 200 rpm sooner. (We say “technically the same” because it has been our longtime suspicion that the N54 is actually 20 to 30 hp more powerful than BMW claims and it’s possible that the N55’s ratings are not similarly underestimated.) The dual-clutch transmission is the same DCT-branded gearbox offered in the Z4. It replaces the 135i’s optional six-speed automatic and costs $200 more, while a six-speed manual is still the standard transmission option; the 128i continues with the choice of six-speed manual or traditional automatic. Credit the Transmission More Than the Engine The close-ratio, seven-speed dual-clutch gearbox feels far better than the conventional autobox it replaces, which itself was a swell-enough automatic. By virtue of its conventionality, however, the auto couldn’t deliver an almost uninterrupted stream of torque to the rear wheels as does the DCT. The outgoing slushbox was also hamstrung by its artful but clumsy-to-use optional shift “paddles,” which required a push for downshifts and a pull for upshifts. The DCT comes with honest-to-goodness, pull-only steering-wheel paddles–downshift on the left, upshift on the right–that make far easier work of changing gears during high-intensity driving. We generally prefer the driver involvement of traditional manual transmissions, especially when they’re as good as the ones offered on most BMW models. In the case of the 135i, the fitment of the DCT may close the preference gap for some, and will very likely improve acceleration times. The difference in character between the N54 and N55 seems minimal, at least in this application, but it’s the DCT’s quick shifts that improve the experience, keeping the engine in the power better than the automatic was able to. We expect that the DCT will bring 0-to-60-mph times down by a tenth or two compared to manual-equipped 135s, into the mid-four-second range. The quickest 135i we’ve tested, a manual-equipped coupe, took only 4.7 seconds to reach 60, while a three-pedal convertible completed the task in 4.9. As expected, the convertible feels both heavier and slightly less nimble in spirited driving, though we could hardly characterize it as sloppy. That said, we don’t expect too many 135i convertible owners to head to the track in their cars, so that’s a relatively moot point. Convertible buyers want convertibles, and this one continues to require very few sacrifices as compared to the coupe. So the good news is that the switch from twin- to single-turbo six hasn’t affected the 135i’s character noticeably. As long as BMW’s output claims are on the up and up, performance should improve, too—we’ll wait for a formal test session to confirm that. Those who would have chosen the automatic last year will be happy with the dual-clutch upgrade. The better news is that the three-pedal manual is still available—at least for now. Let’s keep it that way, okay BMW? Specifications VEHICLE TYPE: front-engine, rear-wheel-drive, 4-passenger, 2-door coupe or convertible BASE PRICE: $38,500–42,800 ENGINE TYPE: turbocharged and intercooled DOHC 24-valve inline-6, aluminum block and head, direct fuel injection Displacement: 182 cu in, 2979 cc Power (SAE net): 300 bhp @ 5800 rpm Torque (SAE net): 300 lb-ft @ 1200 rpm TRANSMISSION: 7-speed dual-clutch automated manual DIMENSIONS: Wheelbase: 104.7 in Length: 172.2 in Width: 68.8 in Height: 55.4 in Curb weight (mfr’s est): 3450–3700 lb PERFORMANCE (C/D EST): Zero to 60 mph: 4.6 sec Standing ¼-mile: 13.2 sec Top speed (governor limited): 130–150 mph FUEL ECONOMY: EPA city/highway driving: 18/25 mpg http://www.caranddriver.com/reviews/...t_drive_review |
05-15-2010, 07:34 AM | #3 |
Captain
92
Rep 857
Posts |
I guess the only way we will know about the engine ratings/suspicions is wait till they drive a 6MT car so the trans is not part of the equation OR WHEN WE HAVE DYNOS.
|
Appreciate
0
|
05-15-2010, 09:01 AM | #4 |
king kong in the trunk...
44
Rep 169
Posts |
C&D has always been a bit optimistic when it comes to acceleration times. For instance, they tested the 135i 'vert from 0-60 in 4.9 seconds, whereas Insideline tested it at 5.5 seconds. Even factoring in various conditions (tires, weight of driver, transmission, temperature, etc), that's a pretty significant difference.
__________________
Some of my test drives: http://www.youtube.com/user/crooner12
|
Appreciate
0
|
05-15-2010, 10:19 AM | #7 |
Banned
76
Rep 5,970
Posts |
|
Appreciate
0
|
05-15-2010, 10:20 AM | #8 |
Banned
76
Rep 5,970
Posts |
|
Appreciate
0
|
05-15-2010, 10:44 AM | #10 |
Banned
71
Rep 2,070
Posts |
4.7 0-60, low 13's in the 1/4 mile, 150mph top speed, Smooth reliable shifing. Dont feel sorry for us. In fact, we should feel sorry for you. TBD as your listed car and wishing one day you might have one. But from what we all know these wishers often dont get what they're wishing for on forums. You keep wishing, we'll keep driving..........fast.
|
Appreciate
0
|
05-15-2010, 11:05 AM | #11 |
Ex '87 Carrera
246
Rep 1,259
Posts |
I'm interested to see that the fuel economy ratings of 18/25 appear to be the same as for the N54. I thought this engine was supposed to improve fuel economy?
ianc
__________________
"I will tell you there is a big difference between driving money and driving blood, sweat and tears." - PorscheGuy79
"I got 328 loaner and was impressed with performance. It feels much faster than my 135i." - MOCKBA |
Appreciate
0
|
05-15-2010, 11:34 AM | #12 | |
Brigadier General
189
Rep 3,435
Posts |
Quote:
Insideline also clocked a 5.0 second 0-60 time when they pitted it against the 335i and the E46 M3. And 5.1 seconds when they put it against the 370Z, Where the hell did you get 5.5 seconds from? |
|
Appreciate
0
|
05-15-2010, 01:00 PM | #13 |
All your 1 are belong to us!!!
20
Rep 658
Posts |
Big difference is IL's "official" times are without the 1-foot rollout, C&D's times are with it. That in itself typically accounts for .2 to .3 of the difference.
|
Appreciate
0
|
05-15-2010, 01:27 PM | #15 |
First Lieutenant
51
Rep 305
Posts |
|
Appreciate
0
|
05-15-2010, 02:06 PM | #16 |
Captain
86
Rep 736
Posts |
Lol, don't feel sorry for AT's.....
.1 or .2 of a second oh god what will I do now. and gas mileage? whatever, I drove freeway this morning on cruise control and got anywhere from 28-38 at any given time @ 75 no doubt dct is nice though. enjoy
__________________
|
Appreciate
0
|
05-15-2010, 02:13 PM | #17 |
Captain
15
Rep 885
Posts
Drives: 25 to 2
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: staten island, NY
|
You guys crack me up. Before the N55's hit, it was "BMW underates the N54 engines, and their 0-60 times. Our cars are supercars"
Now it's.. "These are just estimates... C&D always is optimistic... they use rollout" DCT is cool, and I would have gotten it in an instant... With that said, I am thrilled with my car, and it's a beast. Rock on.
__________________
2010 135i - Alpine White - Coral Red- Glacier Trim - Bluetooth - ///M Sport - Paddle Shifters
|
Appreciate
0
|
05-15-2010, 02:20 PM | #19 | |
Captain
15
Rep 885
Posts
Drives: 25 to 2
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: staten island, NY
|
Quote:
Using that same logic, do you regret your MT purchase being that the STEP is prob .1-.2 quicker? You do not buy MT or a STEP for the difference in .1-.2 seconds... you buy it to fit your needs. MT typically enjoy being more connected with the driving experience. AT guys, may not like the idea of rowing their own boat, or may simply do not know how to drive a MT in a spirited manner, heel to toe shifting etc etc. I can drive MT to get from point a to b. I'm not going to stall or grind gears... To me MT seems like a chore... others love it. Am I confident I can drive in a spirited manner and achieve results anywhere close to the STEP... not at all. to each their own.
__________________
2010 135i - Alpine White - Coral Red- Glacier Trim - Bluetooth - ///M Sport - Paddle Shifters
|
|
Appreciate
0
|
05-15-2010, 02:37 PM | #20 |
Banned
76
Rep 5,970
Posts |
|
Appreciate
0
|
05-15-2010, 05:00 PM | #21 |
Lieutenant Colonel
323
Rep 1,804
Posts |
I wish the OP actually read the article before posting this. Those numbers are estimates people. Let's not get into a N54 vs. N55 battle!
__________________
-Nick
2018 BMW 440i - M Sport, Exec Glacier Silver Metallic/Coral Red Dakota Retired: '00 323i, '06 325Ci, '09 135i, '06 Z4M Roadster, '93 525i, '76 2002, '14 X1, '14 M235i, '16 X4, '16 435i |
Appreciate
0
|
05-15-2010, 05:19 PM | #22 | |
Private First Class
3
Rep 108
Posts |
Quote:
if 0-60mph times really mattered to people, they'd all retrofit limited slip differentials, too. straightline speed has simply never been a BMW forte. if you want pure straightline speed time and time again, i'd go 2011 mustang GT. car & driver also applies a correction factor given testing conditions at the time. edmunds.com does not do this. it's just too difficult to compare different testing methods against one another. it all has to be in the same group, on the same surface, the same driver with the same method. |
|
Appreciate
0
|
Post Reply |
Bookmarks |
|
|