|
|
|
05-31-2011, 01:17 AM | #1 |
Private First Class
24
Rep 131
Posts |
And you thought the E92 M3 was faster
Pretty impressive for a stock car. I had two runs, 4.8 and 4.7 0-100km.
Car Specs Car : 2011 BMW 135i Transmission : DCT Fuel : BP 95 RON (91 equivalent) Wheels : 19inch VMR wheels Engine mods: NONE Runs were done at 2000m above sea level. |
05-31-2011, 01:19 AM | #2 |
Brigadier General
189
Rep 3,435
Posts |
Kinda hard to see the numbers there.
|
Appreciate
0
|
05-31-2011, 02:54 AM | #4 |
Banned
88
Rep 3,070
Posts
Drives: A boring one...
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Australia
|
Are they that accurate though?
|
Appreciate
0
|
05-31-2011, 02:58 AM | #5 |
Brigadier General
480
Rep 4,154
Posts
Drives: 1/18 Monte Carlo Blue E92 M3
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Los Angeles
|
Sorry, don't think its accurate. If you can provide us with time slips from a drag strip then we would believe you. There is no chance you have a 0-60 of 2.3 seconds.
|
Appreciate
0
|
05-31-2011, 03:15 AM | #6 |
Brigadier General
121
Rep 4,070
Posts |
Its kilometers per hour...so 0-100km/h = 0-62mph
|
Appreciate
0
|
05-31-2011, 07:38 AM | #7 |
Resident Kerbalnaut
477
Rep 10,703
Posts |
Classic american |
Appreciate
0
|
05-31-2011, 08:25 AM | #8 |
Lieutenant Colonel
117
Rep 1,664
Posts
Drives: E82 N55 DCT
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: STL, MO
|
haha
__________________
|
Appreciate
0
|
05-31-2011, 08:29 AM | #9 |
Lieutenant Colonel
117
Rep 1,664
Posts
Drives: E82 N55 DCT
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: STL, MO
|
Nice!!! So, intake, tune, exhaust... I bet I'm running about 4.5
__________________
|
Appreciate
0
|
05-31-2011, 08:49 AM | #10 | |
Banned
247
Rep 1,827
Posts |
Quote:
And not in a good way either. |
|
Appreciate
0
|
05-31-2011, 09:04 AM | #11 | |
Major General
159
Rep 5,689
Posts |
Quote:
Jk
__________________
Legal Disclaimer: Anything I or anyone else says about my vehicle on this website(1addicts.com or any affiliated or nonaffiliated sites), pertaining to modifications, is only to gain acceptance from my/our peers, and does not actually represent anything actually existing on my car, and thus, cannot be held against me in any issues, i.e. warranty claims, that may arise.
|
|
Appreciate
0
|
05-31-2011, 09:06 AM | #12 |
First Lieutenant
18
Rep 347
Posts |
with a tune and muffler delete berk i can hang with a m3 till 140mph then m3 is gone. In fact around 80 i gain 2 car lengths.
__________________
"you blink I shift" DCT
|
Appreciate
0
|
05-31-2011, 09:11 AM | #13 |
Brigadier General
121
Rep 4,070
Posts |
^^^You are not hanging with a M3 until 140mph....its possible two car lengths but he missed a shift or slow shifted to be two car lengths. The 135i/1M power band and torque kills the M3 until about 5000rpm in all gears...but after that it is lights out to the M3 due to the bigger displacement engine AND higher redline...
|
Appreciate
0
|
06-03-2011, 08:50 PM | #14 | |
Brigadier General
732
Rep 3,274
Posts |
Quote:
M3 is much stronger at the limit, near the top of the power band and at high speeds. 135i is much stronger in the middle of the power band and at low to moderate speeds. As for OP.. Great numbers! Not far off from what a lot of magazines tested as the stock 0-60 times (around 4.8 sec). Is it totally stock, including the tires?
__________________
2022 X4 M40i - 2008 135i - 2015 F700GS On Order - 2024 i4 M50 Scruffy's gonna die the way he lived... Mmhm. |
|
Appreciate
0
|
06-03-2011, 08:57 PM | #15 |
European Editor
10539
Rep 22,992
Posts |
I don't know. In my informal "autobahn testing" - a stock 135i is darn close to a M3 all the way up to 140-ish (mph). It pretyy much depends on who gets on teh gas first as to who's in front. Maybe I just ran across a bunch of weenie M3's so far. I really would like to see what a real race would be like though.
|
Appreciate
0
|
06-03-2011, 09:04 PM | #16 |
Brigadier General
480
Rep 4,154
Posts
Drives: 1/18 Monte Carlo Blue E92 M3
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Los Angeles
|
Lol didn't see the kmh.
|
Appreciate
0
|
06-04-2011, 12:45 AM | #17 | |
Brigadier General
121
Rep 4,070
Posts |
Quote:
|
|
Appreciate
0
|
06-04-2011, 03:58 PM | #20 |
Private First Class
10
Rep 110
Posts |
Great time. I'm curious how you did it. Did you use launch control? If so, did you hold it until the flag showed up or start at a lower RPM? If not, how did you start to get that time. I'm not questioning the accuracy, I'm just looking for some advice. Thanks.
|
Appreciate
0
|
06-05-2011, 04:17 AM | #21 |
AWD to RWD
8
Rep 135
Posts |
IDK what you guys aren't believing but 4.7 0-60 is what Car and Driver reported. That is the stock number. However, an M3 is 0-60 in 4.0 or less, so IDK why the fuck people think they are the same stock vs stock, thats a massive difference.
Although 135 + JB3 + AFE intake + powerful axleback has to be faster than M3, people are reporting 1/4 times of faster than M3's reported stock 12.9 on just those simple mods.... unless I am mistaken. |
Appreciate
0
|
06-05-2011, 04:44 AM | #22 |
Lieutenant
49
Rep 469
Posts
Drives: BMW 16' M3
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Oxnard, CA
|
A stock M3 0-60mph is not 4.0 or less. Try about 4.4-4.7 seconds.
|
Appreciate
0
|
Post Reply |
Bookmarks |
|
|