|
|
|
09-10-2012, 11:59 AM | #1 |
Enlisted Member
18
Rep 44
Posts |
6.4L/100km or 28MPG?
I downloaded the coupe catalogue from the international site and noticed that the international fuel economy is significantly better than the US fuel rating.
The international catalogue lists the 135i as 6.4 l/100km for Extra-urban. Assuming google is right with the unit conversion this works out to 36.75 mpg. The US brochure lists the 135i at 28mpg Highway. The Urban/City numbers are almost the same 12.1 l/100km (19.44 mpg) VS. 20 mpg. Is there a significant difference in the EU version compared to the US that would cause the 8mpg difference? The spec'ed weights are the same -- EU 1530 kg (3373 lbs) vs US 3373 lbs. The gear ratios are the same. Is it just a different test method? |
09-10-2012, 12:22 PM | #2 |
European Editor
10511
Rep 22,992
Posts |
I once saw 6.8L/100kph... but you have to be driving damm slow to achieve that! Like less than 80 kph.
The EU has three measurements when it comes to fuel economy. Urban/City, highway and combined. None of them is close to real world numbers. A 135i will see anywhere from 9L going slow (driving under 110 kph on the highway) to 20L. I normally see 14.5L on average = driving quickly but not really THAT fast (under 180 kph). BUT... if you drive fast... over 210 kph... you can use lots more fuel. 20L, 30L, 40L is possible. Just this weekend I was driving "fast" and averaged 23L consumption. The most I have used is "only" going 199 kms on 44L 's of SupePlus fuel.
__________________
|
Appreciate
0
|
09-10-2012, 10:17 PM | #3 |
Brigadier General
504
Rep 3,446
Posts |
US quoted fuel economy numbers have been reduced about 30% from EPA test numbers to reflect real world driving conditions. I can reset the MPG on my 135i while driving on the freeway and it will get 30 or 31 mpg despite its 25 mpg rating. Of course if I have to slow down for traffic it drops right away. That European number has not been reduced by the EPA fudge factor.
__________________
See my photography at http://ronscubadiver.wordpress.com
|
Appreciate
0
|
09-10-2012, 10:24 PM | #4 |
Resident Kerbalnaut
477
Rep 10,703
Posts |
I routinely manage mid to low 30s highway in my 135 - these numbers are relatively achievable (although having a vert helps with this)
My guess is that the EPA numbers are either very conservative or that google is translating into UK gallons (which are larger than US gallons) If we assume that UK gallons are being used than the EPA numbers translate to about 34 UK MPG - much closer to your source's economy rating. And because people will be asking about my first point a vert with the top down experiences some fun aerodynamic benefits over a coupe. Namely a re-circulation vortex. the flow over the top of the vert separates so much that viscous effects on the surface cant take hold. Actually reducing drag! Last edited by BrokenVert; 09-10-2012 at 10:32 PM.. |
Appreciate
0
|
09-10-2012, 10:34 PM | #5 |
I want to drive a Zamboni
1125
Rep 5,551
Posts
Drives: 13 E93 M3 18 F80 M3 16 K71
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Monte Sereno, CA
|
Brokenvert how did you manage on 30mpg?
__________________
18 F80 Imola Red 6MT
16 K71 F800GT Montego Blue 13 E93 M3 Melbourne Red 2000 E46,2006 E90,09 E82,13 E93 328i,14 F30 335i,18 F80 M3 My next vehicle would be a Zamboni |
Appreciate
0
|
09-11-2012, 06:45 AM | #6 | |
First Lieutenant
12
Rep 317
Posts |
Quote:
__________________
BMW - 135i DCT
Audi - Q5 3.0TDI |
|
Appreciate
0
|
09-11-2012, 06:59 AM | #7 | |
Captain
209
Rep 959
Posts |
Quote:
__________________
|
|
Appreciate
0
|
09-11-2012, 10:15 AM | #8 | |
Resident Kerbalnaut
477
Rep 10,703
Posts |
Quote:
What makes you think that the verts wake is "double" that of the coupe? The verts advantage is much the same as the one experienced by pickups. It's called a recirculating vortex (the point that you both seemed to skip last time around) Since friction is the main source of drag at low Re (and hence low velocities) the flow separation over what would be the roof of a coupe causes the air to bypass actually touching the roof. Reducing skin friction drag! Why at those two points coming up in a talk about constant velocity efficiency? there another concept called inertia that comes into play. Inertia makes the difference in holding a 3650 pound car and a 3400 pound at speed almost nonexistent - so we can ignore it. I'll go into more detail when I'm doing this on a computer and not my phone. Here's another fun fact that blows people's minds - drag doesn't increase with the square of velocity. It's actually a parabolic curve. Pilots should know the term "flying the backside of the drag curve". Well guess what. In most autos and day to day situations we drive on the backside of the curve. It's means that we can drive faster and create less aerodynamic drag! But only to a point. I should generate a drag curve for the 135. It'd be fun |
|
Appreciate
0
|
Post Reply |
Bookmarks |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|