BMW 1 Series Coupe Forum / 1 Series Convertible Forum (1M / tii / 135i / 128i / Coupe / Cabrio / Hatchback) (BMW E82 E88 128i 130i 135i)
 





 

Post Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
      05-07-2011, 07:29 PM   #89
JB4-335
Brigadier General
Australia
168
Rep
3,093
Posts

Drives: E92 BSM & E70 AW
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Australia

iTrader: (1)

Congrats JD. That is extremely impressive.
Weather is ideal at the moment.
Now get out there and drive that baby!!
Appreciate 0
      05-07-2011, 08:00 PM   #90
Orlin
Major
Orlin's Avatar
Australia
44
Rep
1,359
Posts

Drives: F30 335i
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Brisbane, Australia

iTrader: (1)

Sweet numbers JD, congrats. As I suspected removal of the secondary cats in the mid pipes would show little to no gains however its testing like this that really does help by turning speculation into hard evidence. Thanks again for taking the time to step this all out for the purpose of education
Appreciate 0
      05-08-2011, 04:28 AM   #91
Kiwi Peter
Kiwi Peter's Avatar
New Zealand
160
Rep
1,460
Posts

Drives: E92 M3 2012 Edition 500
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Cambridge, New Zealand

iTrader: (0)

Skycat

Hi there JD
Hows the car, is 300 killer wasps enough or do you still want more.
Appreciate 0
      05-08-2011, 04:31 AM   #92
Orlin
Major
Orlin's Avatar
Australia
44
Rep
1,359
Posts

Drives: F30 335i
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Brisbane, Australia

iTrader: (1)

Quote:
Originally Posted by skycat View Post
Hi there JD
Hows the car, is 300 killer wasps enough or do you still want more.
I dont think he could get much more out of it without upgrading the turbos.
Appreciate 0
      05-08-2011, 04:41 AM   #93
BMW86
Major General
Australia
398
Rep
9,156
Posts

Drives: RS3 Sedan / Macan S
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Australia

iTrader: (0)

Far out JD.. I'm very impressed with your build and getting the big 300.

I'm a bit confused why you made less power with the downpipe back exhaust.. You said the car was running leaner with only the donwpipes.. so what settings are you running on the Procede, i'm not very familiar with how it works.

Have fun testing it on the roads... any plans to hit the drags?
Appreciate 0
      05-08-2011, 04:43 AM   #94
1q2w3e4r
Breakfast at Tiffany's
1q2w3e4r's Avatar
24
Rep
1,053
Posts

Drives: BMW
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Sydney

iTrader: (0)

Quote:
Originally Posted by skycat View Post
Hi there JD
Hows the car, is 300 killer wasps enough or do you still want more.
Hey Pete how's things mate? Called Saturday as i was going to pop in as I was down the road. Didn't hear from Kenny till it was too late.

Met a Kiwi guy with an R35 who runs at Bathurst who might give you a call to sort his exhaust out
Appreciate 0
      05-08-2011, 05:08 AM   #95
Kiwi Peter
Kiwi Peter's Avatar
New Zealand
160
Rep
1,460
Posts

Drives: E92 M3 2012 Edition 500
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Cambridge, New Zealand

iTrader: (0)

skycat

Hi Ben
Time you called by for a chat, hey when are you going to get your 135. I must say i am growing to like these cars, so much so i have been looking for a left hook US car. Nice to see Justins car is working well
Appreciate 0
      05-08-2011, 05:52 AM   #96
MrBlonde
Colonel
MrBlonde's Avatar
Australia
122
Rep
2,695
Posts

Drives: Audi TTRS, M Coupe, 1299
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Merewether

iTrader: (0)

That's it Peter, Benny needs to unload all those Porsches and get himself a 135!
__________________
.-=[ Kenny ]=-. 1999 BMW M Coupe 10.775 @ 134.35 mph w/1.600 60' (Best 136.07 mph) 25th August 2004. +2010 X5 35D+

Check out the 1Addicts Drag Racing Standings and Drag Racing 101.
Appreciate 0
      05-08-2011, 07:09 PM   #97
adrian@vishnu
Australia
39
Rep
672
Posts

Drives: 135i
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Sydney, Australia

iTrader: (0)

Nice results Justin!!

I am not surprised that there was little (no) power gain in the mid and rear exhaust sections. It is well documented that the stock exhaust is pretty good, and you are not the first to test upgrading it, and find little benefit. As for the power reduction... I doubt it is actually making less power. As you can see it pretty much matches the curve until high RPM, and a variation of less than 10kW is within the repeatablility of the dyno... particularly if the car has been restrapped. It is normally at the top end that you will see the most power change due to strap tension, as the torque is dropping off, and it is the torque that pushes the car higher on the rollers.

Your car seems to make very good power, and we are certainly struggling for fuel. We may want to consider increasing the meth ratio to less water and more meth. This would improve the AFRs. They are not terrible, but it would certainly be better to see them around 12.5 for most of the run.

Cheers,

Adrian
Appreciate 0
      05-09-2011, 05:02 AM   #98
Unkie
Second Lieutenant
Unkie's Avatar
Australia
15
Rep
224
Posts

Drives: BMW
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Brisbane, Australia

iTrader: (0)

That's fantastic Jus! Some fantastic numbers, and more the point, fantastic area under the power curve!
That graph just screams daily drivability

Thanks for the details, certainly will help a number of other owners decide on mod choices with an informed expectation of power gain
Appreciate 0
      05-09-2011, 06:49 AM   #99
JD75
JDTuning
216
Rep
907
Posts

Drives: G20 M340i xDrive,G80 M3 xDrive
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Sydney

iTrader: (1)

Quote:
Originally Posted by mattyv View Post
Nicely done, JD. Enjoy the "testing" this weekend
Cheers mate, I will or should I say I did.

Quote:
Originally Posted by JB4135 View Post
Congrats JD. That is extremely impressive.
Weather is ideal at the moment.
Now get out there and drive that baby!!
Thanks dude.

Yep, I did just that on Sunday.

It was a fantastic day for a long drive and clocked up quite a few kilometres, prior to some "spirited" driving, during the early hours of Monday morning.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Orlin View Post
Sweet numbers JD, congrats. As I suspected removal of the secondary cats in the mid pipes would show little to no gains however its testing like this that really does help by turning speculation into hard evidence. Thanks again for taking the time to step this all out for the purpose of education
Thank you, I have very much enjoyed the build process thus far.

I must admit I did expect to pick up some horses, following the deletion of the midpipe cats.

I wonder if the increased flow that comes from the decrease in back pressure, may be more relevant as power is increased significantly beyond 300 rwkw, via "upped" RB turbos.
Appreciate 0
      05-09-2011, 07:10 AM   #100
BMW86
Major General
Australia
398
Rep
9,156
Posts

Drives: RS3 Sedan / Macan S
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Australia

iTrader: (0)

Quote:
Originally Posted by JD75 View Post
I wonder if the increased flow that comes from the decrease in back pressure, may be more relevant as power is increased significantly beyond 300 rwkw, via "upped" RB turbos.
I bet it sounds intoxicating anyway!
Appreciate 0
      05-09-2011, 07:24 AM   #101
JD75
JDTuning
216
Rep
907
Posts

Drives: G20 M340i xDrive,G80 M3 xDrive
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Sydney

iTrader: (1)

Quote:
Originally Posted by skycat View Post
Hi there JD
Hows the car, is 300 killer wasps enough or do you still want more.
Hey Pete, the car is a torque monster.

It's so very tractable when in 4th or 5th gear, from as little as 2,000 RPM.

When at WOT the engine is pulling very hard at the top of third, grab fourth and the surge of torque is significant to say the least.

Is 300 enough...

In the short term yes, in the long time I imagine no, haha.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Orlin View Post
I dont think he could get much more out of it without upgrading the turbos.
Yep, I tend to agree.

Ummm, I suspect two of these will help the cause somewhat.
Attached Images
 
Appreciate 0
      05-09-2011, 07:55 AM   #102
JD75
JDTuning
216
Rep
907
Posts

Drives: G20 M340i xDrive,G80 M3 xDrive
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Sydney

iTrader: (1)

Quote:
Originally Posted by BMW86 View Post
Far out JD.. I'm very impressed with your build and getting the big 300.

I'm a bit confused why you made less power with the downpipe back exhaust.. You said the car was running leaner with only the donwpipes.. so what settings are you running on the Procede, i'm not very familiar with how it works.

Have fun testing it on the roads... any plans to hit the drags?

Thanks mate, I appreciate the kind words.

I wasn't suggesting the car made less power, as a result of the downpipe back exhaust.

I had suspected that the safer AFR's following the increase in Meth flow, resulted in a small power loss.

However if you read Adrian's post above, he describes the reduction in power as an acceptable variance, most likely as a result of a small difference between tie down tension.

It makes sense, we are talking about a 6 rwkw difference on a vehicle that is making in excess of 300 rwkw, as a % that is f... all.

Fun was had, no plans to hit the drags at the moment.

I will have to resolve traction issues in 1st and 2nd gear, before I could pull off a respectable ET.

Last edited by JD75; 05-09-2011 at 08:08 AM.. Reason: Typo
Appreciate 0
      05-09-2011, 08:33 AM   #103
DMM
Enlisted Member
Australia
4
Rep
45
Posts

Drives: Ask my bank
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Sydney

iTrader: (0)

Justin with the bigger turbo's im sure you will see the benefits of the new exhaust! The turbos right now are spinning way out of their efficiency range. The extra decrease in back pressure from the new exhaust is making them huff and puff way out of their league

Looking forward to seeing how much rubber has been left in the rear gaurds after your weekend orientation
Appreciate 0
      05-09-2011, 08:53 AM   #104
BMW86
Major General
Australia
398
Rep
9,156
Posts

Drives: RS3 Sedan / Macan S
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Australia

iTrader: (0)

Quote:
Originally Posted by JD75 View Post
Hey Pete, the car is a torque monster.

It's so very tractable when in 4th or 5th gear, from as little as 2,000 RPM.

When at WOT the engine is pulling very hard at the top of third, grab fourth and the surge of torque is significant to say the least.

Is 300 enough...

In the short term yes, in the long time I imagine no, haha.



Yep, I tend to agree.

Ummm, I suspect two of these will help the cause somewhat.
Appreciate 0
      05-10-2011, 04:46 PM   #105
JD75
JDTuning
216
Rep
907
Posts

Drives: G20 M340i xDrive,G80 M3 xDrive
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Sydney

iTrader: (1)

Quote:
Originally Posted by adrian@vishnu View Post
Nice results Justin!!

Your car seems to make very good power, and we are certainly struggling for fuel. We may want to consider increasing the meth ratio to less water and more meth. This would improve the AFRs. They are not terrible, but it would certainly be better to see them around 12.5 for most of the run.

Cheers,

Adrian
Hey Adrian,

I am VERY happy with the results we have achieved.

With regards increasing the Meth to water ratio of the mix we are spraying, I am not sure AFR's will benefit significantly from that.

We are already using a Meth to water mix of 60/40.

Unfortunately the flow sensor used in the Coolingmist kit, requires the minimum amount of water in the mix to be 30%.

What we need to do is increase the amount of fuel being injected, by the fuel delivery system.

As such Adrian the big question is, how far away is Vishnu from releasing their fuel system upgrade?

I believe the upgrade was primarily aimed at the guys running "upped" turbos.

However as the engine is making very good power, it would seem we have already encroached upon the ceiling of the "stock" fuel system.

Cheers,

JD.
Appreciate 0
      05-10-2011, 05:03 PM   #106
JD75
JDTuning
216
Rep
907
Posts

Drives: G20 M340i xDrive,G80 M3 xDrive
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Sydney

iTrader: (1)

Quote:
Originally Posted by Unkie View Post
That's fantastic Jus! Some fantastic numbers, and more the point, fantastic area under the power curve!
That graph just screams daily drivability

Thanks for the details, certainly will help a number of other owners decide on mod choices with an informed expectation of power gain
Yes, the drivability of the car is something that must be experienced, to truly appreciate.

The "stock" car had a significant amount of low end/mid range torque.

My "tuned" car has a huge amount of low end/mid range torque.

Cool mate, my pleasure.

I have thoroughly enjoyed the "build" process.

As such I'm more than happy to provide some solid info and in doing so, help dispense with the BS that exists on internet forums.

Cheers.

Last edited by JD75; 05-10-2011 at 05:09 PM.. Reason: Typo
Appreciate 0
      05-10-2011, 09:37 PM   #107
1q2w3e4r
Breakfast at Tiffany's
1q2w3e4r's Avatar
24
Rep
1,053
Posts

Drives: BMW
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Sydney

iTrader: (0)

Surely the fuel issue is nothing an 044 pump couldn't sort out?
Appreciate 0
      05-10-2011, 11:33 PM   #108
adrian@vishnu
Australia
39
Rep
672
Posts

Drives: 135i
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Sydney, Australia

iTrader: (0)

Unfortunately the stock fuel system is quite complex, and an 044 isn;t going to cut it. We are working on something, but not available for a while yet. I use an 044 in my other car.... great pump!!

As for the meth %, I though Dale indicated the mixture was the other way around... 60% water, 40% meth. I am sure that is what he said. Either way, since mixtures are suffering, I would be moving towards 70% meth.

The other thing to remember is that the main reason people want rich mixtures is to suppress knock. There is no evidence of this with your butter smooth dynos.

Cheers,

Adrian
Appreciate 0
      05-11-2011, 07:24 PM   #109
JB4-335
Brigadier General
Australia
168
Rep
3,093
Posts

Drives: E92 BSM & E70 AW
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Australia

iTrader: (1)

Quote:
Originally Posted by JD75 View Post
Hey Adrian,

I am VERY happy with the results we have achieved.

With regards increasing the Meth to water ratio of the mix we are spraying, I am not sure AFR's will benefit significantly from that.

We are already using a Meth to water mix of 60/40.

Unfortunately the flow sensor used in the Coolingmist kit, requires the minimum amount of water in the mix to be 30%.

What we need to do is increase the amount of fuel being injected, by the fuel delivery system.

As such Adrian the big question is, how far away is Vishnu from releasing their fuel system upgrade?

I believe the upgrade was primarily aimed at the guys running "upped" turbos.

However as the engine is making very good power, it would seem we have already encroached upon the ceiling of the "stock" fuel system.

Cheers,

JD.
Hey JD,

The new FCB (Fault Control Box) from coolingmist allows for a higher mix of meth. It's stated that the FCB is for users that want to run more than 70% meth. Check it out, it's the latest System X.
Appreciate 0
      05-11-2011, 07:44 PM   #110
DMM
Enlisted Member
Australia
4
Rep
45
Posts

Drives: Ask my bank
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Sydney

iTrader: (0)

Give us some more results Justin!!

Unfortunately there's nothing more the meth will do - the engine is almost getting over satured now! The fuel curve you see is the best it will get without going to a standalone management system.
Appreciate 0
Post Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:05 AM.




1addicts
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
1Addicts.com, BIMMERPOST.com, E90Post.com, F30Post.com, M3Post.com, ZPost.com, 5Post.com, 6Post.com, 7Post.com, XBimmers.com logo and trademark are properties of BIMMERPOST