BMW 1 Series Coupe Forum / 1 Series Convertible Forum (1M / tii / 135i / 128i / Coupe / Cabrio / Hatchback) (BMW E82 E88 128i 130i 135i)
 





 

Post Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
      09-16-2011, 02:50 PM   #23
Boxtyp3
Major
Boxtyp3's Avatar
Philippines
78
Rep
1,353
Posts

Drives: 2015 F32 MG
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: SF Bay Area

iTrader: (0)

Garage List
2015 F32 435  [0.00]
2002 E46 cp  [0.00]
2010 E82 135i  [0.00]
2013 E92 335i  [0.00]
Try increasing the psi a little bit. The way I understand it is that the wider tires has more contact with the road hence more grip. Probably that's why its following the road grooves. Just an opinion.
Appreciate 0
      09-16-2011, 04:20 PM   #24
fourtailpipes
Major
110
Rep
1,338
Posts

Drives: the ladies crazy
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: , Location, Location!

iTrader: (0)

Quote:
Originally Posted by bogart View Post
Actually... toe-in will make things "feel" worse. The adjustment that would eliminate the issue would be negative camber and neutral or toe-out. I know this because when my car was stock with almost no negative camber and toe-in, it would tramline like crazy. After suspension upgrades I now run -3 degree camber and I had it set at 1/8-1/4" toe-out. Tramline sensation went away completely.

I just recently changed it back to a slight toe-in, I would say about 1/8", and even with the negative camber, I now feel the tramline again. So, some toe-out, alone, may do the trick now that I think about it more.
you have this backwards. toe out improves turn-in and hurts straight line stability. toe in hurts turn-in but improves straight line stability. your results/impressions may have been muddied a bit by the simultaneous camber change, though that should also have the opposite effect from what you described (all things being equal). take a look at this... it's a little elementary, but covers the basics. the grassroots motorsports article linked at the bottom of page 1 is also good.

Last edited by fourtailpipes; 09-16-2011 at 06:08 PM.. Reason: link fixed
Appreciate 0
      09-17-2011, 06:02 PM   #25
bogart
Lieutenant Colonel
bogart's Avatar
United_States
116
Rep
1,664
Posts

Drives: E82 N55 DCT
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: STL, MO

iTrader: (4)

Garage List
2011 BMW 135i  [7.06]
Quote:
Originally Posted by fourtailpipes View Post
you have this backwards. toe out improves turn-in and hurts straight line stability. toe in hurts turn-in but improves straight line stability. your results/impressions may have been muddied a bit by the simultaneous camber change, though that should also have the opposite effect from what you described (all things being equal). take a look at this... it's a little elementary, but covers the basics. the grassroots motorsports article linked at the bottom of page 1 is also good.
... I know what toe does. I studied racecar vehicle dynamics (rvd) throughout college. I think you misunderstood my explanation. Basically, toe-in will tramline more than toe-out. I know this from experience with different suspension settings, tires, and suspension parts on my own car.
__________________
Appreciate 0
      09-17-2011, 07:10 PM   #26
fourtailpipes
Major
110
Rep
1,338
Posts

Drives: the ladies crazy
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: , Location, Location!

iTrader: (0)

Quote:
Originally Posted by bogart View Post
... I know what toe does. I studied racecar vehicle dynamics (rvd) throughout college. I think you misunderstood my explanation. Basically, toe-in will tramline more than toe-out. I know this from experience with different suspension settings, tires, and suspension parts on my own car.
interesting... and highly unique. can you cite a source you've encountered in your college studies that corroborates this? this directly contradicts the prevailing consensus, including every chassis dynamics source i can come up with.
Appreciate 0
      09-17-2011, 07:51 PM   #27
3liter1
First Lieutenant
3liter1's Avatar
United_States
57
Rep
376
Posts

Drives: 2019 X3
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Northern NJ

iTrader: (1)

__________________
2018 M3 Alpine White -gone
2009 128i Auto -gone
2014 128 grand coupe - gone
Appreciate 0
      09-17-2011, 10:03 PM   #28
bogart
Lieutenant Colonel
bogart's Avatar
United_States
116
Rep
1,664
Posts

Drives: E82 N55 DCT
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: STL, MO

iTrader: (4)

Garage List
2011 BMW 135i  [7.06]
I don't expect anyone to necessarily agree with me, I'm just trying to help out with the issue based on my education and experience with my own car through trial and error.

According to the following books:

Chassis Design and Race Car Vehicle Dynamics by William and Douglas Milliken

and based on the design of the 1-series front MacPherson strut suspension I believe the following is taking place to cause a tramlining sensation:

- Tires with stiffer and shorter sidewall heights tend to transmit more load from the road through the sidewall to the wheel, and then ultimately to the steering wheel. I believe that wider tires will actually help combat this issue since there is more contact with the road and would have less of a tendency to follow small imperfections in the road compared to thinner tires. I also believe that switching from RFT to non-RFT would help, due to the change in sidewall stiffness.

- Low caster angle will increase tramlining, because as the wheel turns it creates less negative camber during cornering. The solution to this would be to increase caster angle in the positive direction. This will only create camber when the wheel is turned, which is good for handling as well as keeping tire wear in check. It also allows for better longitudinal grip during braking.

- Negative camber with zero toe or toe-in will increase tramlining due to the scrub radius. Negative camber with toe-out will have little to no affect on tramlining. I will address this later.

- Bushing stiffness will affect tramlining. Forces are transmitted from the road through the tire to the wheel, which is connected to the upright. The upright is supported by the control arms and strut. If the bushings in the control arms that are connected to the chassis are too soft, the upright will move at a different rate compared to the rest of the suspension. The tie-rod also connects to the upright as well as the rack and pinion. As the bushings deform and the upright moves, this will cause a force through the tie-rod that will be felt in the steering wheel. Increasing the bushing stiffness or using solid mounts will decrease tramlining. The problem with solid mounts is that it would cause extreme suspension and chassis wear as well as increase NVH. However, this would be the only way to completely control the suspension geometry. Many racecars use solid mounts for this reason.

- The 1-series front suspension is designed with a positive scrub radius. Spacers, wider wheels, and wider tires will all increase the scrub radius even more in the positive direction. The reason that I believe that toe-out will decrease tramlining is because if the suspension is set at toe-in or zero-toe, the positive scrub radius will rotate the wheel toward the toe-out direction automatically during deceleration, such as letting off the accelerator momentarily, and drastically during braking. Tires in a toe-in setting will constantly be pulling inward, this is why it is so stable. However, the combination of scrub radius and toe-in will cause the tire and wheel to rotate back and forth between toe-out and toe-in and this easily allows the tires to follow different irregularities in the road, but if the setting is already at toe-out then during deceleration the tires and wheels will remain stable at the toe-out condition not causing any extra force through the tie-rod.

For a stock 1-series I would suggest:
- Wider tires.
- Alignment: Front camber -1.5 degress, front toe-out 1/8", caster 7 degrees.

For a 1-series with moddified suspension including M3 control arms and sway, coilovers, camber plates, and adjustable endlinks:
- Wider tires.
- Alignment: Front camber: max approx -3 degrees, front toe-out 1/8", caster 9 degrees.
__________________
Appreciate 0
      09-17-2011, 10:42 PM   #29
fourtailpipes
Major
110
Rep
1,338
Posts

Drives: the ladies crazy
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: , Location, Location!

iTrader: (0)

Quote:
Originally Posted by bogart View Post
I don't expect anyone to necessarily agree with me, I'm just trying to help out with the issue based on my education and experience with my own car through trial and error.

According to the following books:

Chassis Design and Race Car Vehicle Dynamics by William and Douglas Milliken

and based on the design of the 1-series front MacPherson strut suspension I believe the following is taking place to cause a tramlining sensation:

- Tires with stiffer and shorter sidewall heights tend to transmit more load from the road through the sidewall to the wheel, and then ultimately to the steering wheel. I believe that wider tires will actually help combat this issue since there is more contact with the road and would have less of a tendency to follow small imperfections in the road compared to thinner tires. I also believe that switching from RFT to non-RFT would help, due to the change in sidewall stiffness.

- Low caster angle will increase tramlining, because as the wheel turns it creates less negative camber during cornering. The solution to this would be to increase caster angle in the positive direction. This will only create camber when the wheel is turned, which is good for handling as well as keeping tire wear in check. It also allows for better longitudinal grip during braking.

- Negative camber with zero toe or toe-in will increase tramlining due to the scrub radius. Negative camber with toe-out will have little to no affect on tramlining. I will address this later.

- Bushing stiffness will affect tramlining. Forces are transmitted from the road through the tire to the wheel, which is connected to the upright. The upright is supported by the control arms and strut. If the bushings in the control arms that are connected to the chassis are too soft, the upright will move at a different rate compared to the rest of the suspension. The tie-rod also connects to the upright as well as the rack and pinion. As the bushings deform and the upright moves, this will cause a force through the tie-rod that will be felt in the steering wheel. Increasing the bushing stiffness or using solid mounts will decrease tramlining. The problem with solid mounts is that it would cause extreme suspension and chassis wear as well as increase NVH. However, this would be the only way to completely control the suspension geometry. Many racecars use solid mounts for this reason.

- The 1-series front suspension is designed with a positive scrub radius. Spacers, wider wheels, and wider tires will all increase the scrub radius even more in the positive direction. The reason that I believe that toe-out will decrease tramlining is because if the suspension is set at toe-in or zero-toe, the positive scrub radius will rotate the wheel toward the toe-out direction automatically during deceleration, such as letting off the accelerator momentarily, and drastically during braking. Tires in a toe-in setting will constantly be pulling inward, this is why it is so stable. However, the combination of scrub radius and toe-in will cause the tire and wheel to rotate back and forth between toe-out and toe-in and this easily allows the tires to follow different irregularities in the road, but if the setting is already at toe-out then during deceleration the tires and wheels will remain stable at the toe-out condition not causing any extra force through the tie-rod.

For a stock 1-series I would suggest:
- Wider tires.
- Alignment: Front camber -1.5 degress, front toe-out 1/8", caster 7 degrees.

For a 1-series with moddified suspension including M3 control arms and sway, coilovers, camber plates, and adjustable endlinks:
- Wider tires.
- Alignment: Front camber: max approx -3 degrees, front toe-out 1/8", caster 9 degrees.
this is all true in pieces, but your conclusion essentially challenges the alignment philosophy which has been developed by BMW engineers across decades of macpherson-strut-having platforms (fortunately or not) set up to minimize tramlining. i think it's a much safer bet that there's something else amok with his alignment.

it's also worth clarifying that as long as the positive caster angle is greater than the negative camber angle by absolute value (which is always the case in these cars), wheel tilt increases throughout steering rack travel. but that's just an aside.
Appreciate 0
      09-18-2011, 03:56 AM   #30
RimasRS
Colonel
RimasRS's Avatar
85
Rep
2,438
Posts

Drives: BMW X3 SD
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Europe

iTrader: (0)

Thanks again guys but now I'm confused a bit toe in or toe out? Would be interesting to study for example E46 cars like 325i and M3 what differences in suspension and alignment setup those cars have???
Appreciate 0
      09-18-2011, 08:49 AM   #31
bogart
Lieutenant Colonel
bogart's Avatar
United_States
116
Rep
1,664
Posts

Drives: E82 N55 DCT
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: STL, MO

iTrader: (4)

Garage List
2011 BMW 135i  [7.06]
Quote:
Originally Posted by fourtailpipes View Post
this is all true in pieces, but your conclusion essentially challenges the alignment philosophy which has been developed by BMW engineers across decades of macpherson-strut-having platforms (fortunately or not) set up to minimize tramlining. i think it's a much safer bet that there's something else amok with his alignment.

it's also worth clarifying that as long as the positive caster angle is greater than the negative camber angle by absolute value (which is always the case in these cars), wheel tilt increases throughout steering rack travel. but that's just an aside.
True... he should get a 4-wheel alignment to make sure nothing was knocked out of whack. Maybe he should just try toe-in and toe-out and see which setup he likes more. It is a 10 minute adjustment in the driveway.

Good clarification on caster angle. Thanks
__________________
Appreciate 0
      09-18-2011, 02:05 PM   #32
fourtailpipes
Major
110
Rep
1,338
Posts

Drives: the ladies crazy
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: , Location, Location!

iTrader: (0)

Quote:
Originally Posted by bogart View Post
True... he should get a 4-wheel alignment to make sure nothing was knocked out of whack. Maybe he should just try toe-in and toe-out and see which setup he likes more. It is a 10 minute adjustment in the driveway.
great recommendations. there are plenty of DIY alignment threads out there to follow if he wants to play with toe, but a clean alignment is always needed as a starting point.
Appreciate 0
      09-18-2011, 06:59 PM   #33
fourtailpipes
Major
110
Rep
1,338
Posts

Drives: the ladies crazy
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: , Location, Location!

iTrader: (0)

Quote:
Originally Posted by RimasRS View Post
Thanks again guys but now I'm confused a bit toe in or toe out? Would be interesting to study for example E46 cars like 325i and M3 what differences in suspension and alignment setup those cars have???
start with a fresh alignment to factory specs (which would include a small amount of toe-in). make sure you get a before/after printout. if there is still a tramlining issue, go from there. my guess is this should solve it, or if it doesn't it'll at least be much easier to troubleshoot from there, since we'll have a solid baseline. right now we don't really know what your alignment looks like, so we can only speculate.
Appreciate 0
      09-19-2011, 01:49 AM   #34
RimasRS
Colonel
RimasRS's Avatar
85
Rep
2,438
Posts

Drives: BMW X3 SD
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Europe

iTrader: (0)

Quote:
Originally Posted by fourtailpipes View Post
start with a fresh alignment to factory specs (which would include a small amount of toe-in). make sure you get a before/after printout. if there is still a tramlining issue, go from there. my guess is this should solve it, or if it doesn't it'll at least be much easier to troubleshoot from there, since we'll have a solid baseline. right now we don't really know what your alignment looks like, so we can only speculate.
Well I can tell you it's 100% stock/oem but thanks
Appreciate 0
      09-19-2011, 05:34 PM   #35
info@VMRWheels
info@VMRWheels's Avatar
31
Rep
326
Posts

Drives: BMW
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Anaheim, CA

iTrader: (0)

OP - Definitely sounds like an alignment issue. I'd recommend taking the car in to see if everything is within spec. A bit of toe might help you with the tramlining you are experiencing.
Appreciate 0
      09-19-2011, 05:51 PM   #36
fourtailpipes
Major
110
Rep
1,338
Posts

Drives: the ladies crazy
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: , Location, Location!

iTrader: (0)

Quote:
Originally Posted by RimasRS View Post
Well I can tell you it's 100% stock/oem but thanks
do you have the spec sheet from your alignment?
Appreciate 0
      09-20-2011, 02:30 AM   #37
RimasRS
Colonel
RimasRS's Avatar
85
Rep
2,438
Posts

Drives: BMW X3 SD
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Europe

iTrader: (0)

Quote:
Originally Posted by fourtailpipes View Post
do you have the spec sheet from your alignment?
I had it somewhere will look for it and will try to share it
Appreciate 0
      09-20-2011, 08:08 AM   #38
bogart
Lieutenant Colonel
bogart's Avatar
United_States
116
Rep
1,664
Posts

Drives: E82 N55 DCT
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: STL, MO

iTrader: (4)

Garage List
2011 BMW 135i  [7.06]
My car tramlined a lot more with the factory alignment settings when I first bought the car brand new than it does now.
__________________
Appreciate 0
Post Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:30 AM.




1addicts
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
1Addicts.com, BIMMERPOST.com, E90Post.com, F30Post.com, M3Post.com, ZPost.com, 5Post.com, 6Post.com, 7Post.com, XBimmers.com logo and trademark are properties of BIMMERPOST