BMW 1 Series Coupe Forum / 1 Series Convertible Forum (1M / tii / 135i / 128i / Coupe / Cabrio / Hatchback) (BMW E82 E88 128i 130i 135i)
 





 

Post Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
      03-26-2014, 09:33 AM   #1
SalemChiro
Second Lieutenant
9
Rep
268
Posts

Drives: 135i vert
Join Date: May 2012
Location: MA

iTrader: (0)

135i Convertible Spring Rates

Does anyone know the stock 135i E88 spring rates? I've searched and searched with no luck.


I want Koni yellows with Swift Spec-R springs....No coilovers in my future.

After speaking with Swift, they said it should work....but it will sit slightly lower than the E82.

The E88 is only 300 lbs. more, and the weight distribution is very close so I wouldn't expect the rear to squat much. E82 bias= 52% front 48% rear. E88 bias= 50.3% front, 49.7% rear.

I might be the guinea pig to try this out. I figure if it doesn't work i'll just install the stock springs back in.
Appreciate 0
      03-26-2014, 09:42 AM   #2
Rob Daman
Captain
32
Rep
826
Posts

Drives: 2007 E90 335i
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: OC, CA USA

iTrader: (2)

do it because i'm curious too. i've read swift springs are really good.
Appreciate 0
      03-26-2014, 09:49 AM   #3
135iam
Second Lieutenant
7
Rep
257
Posts

Drives: 2010 135i 6mt
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: IL

iTrader: (2)

I called eibach, H&R, and Swift on this and talked to either tech help or their R&D departments.

The best answer I received was from H&R. A 1.2" rear drop on a coupe is 1.4" on a convert using the following springs (pn. 29187)
The swift rear springs are firmer than H&R so I was expecting similar or less sag with swift compared to H&R.
But I ended up finding a deal on new KWv3's so I didn't order the swifts.

Interested in hearing how this goes for you
Appreciate 0
      03-26-2014, 10:06 AM   #4
SalemChiro
Second Lieutenant
9
Rep
268
Posts

Drives: 135i vert
Join Date: May 2012
Location: MA

iTrader: (0)

With Swift on the coupe, some report a 1" drop front and rear. I've also read 1" front and .8" rear. If I get an extra .2" all around I'm fine with that.

I'm more concerned pairing the correct spring/shock combination for comfort/performance rather than the overall look of having the car lowered. That's my reasoning behind the Swift springs vs. leaving the stockers in.
Appreciate 0
      03-26-2014, 10:17 AM   #5
128Convertibleguy
Captain
60
Rep
704
Posts

Drives: 2010 128 Covertible
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: Mountains

iTrader: (0)

Smile

Quote:
Originally Posted by SalemChiro View Post
With Swift on the coupe, some report a 1" drop front and rear. I've also read 1" front and .8" rear. If I get an extra .2" all around I'm fine with that.

I'm more concerned pairing the correct spring/shock combination for comfort/performance rather than the overall look of having the car lowered. That's my reasoning behind the Swift springs vs. leaving the stockers in.
My answer for better comfort/performance with stock ride height will be stock springs and Koni FSDs, and a bigger front antiroll bar for roll control. Less performance than Swift/yellows, but stock ride height and better comfort. It's a good pairing, the FSDs were designed specifically for stock ride height.

Just a personal choice based on priorities, not a case of right/wrong. I'm not big on lowering.
Appreciate 0
Post Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:57 PM.




1addicts
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
1Addicts.com, BIMMERPOST.com, E90Post.com, F30Post.com, M3Post.com, ZPost.com, 5Post.com, 6Post.com, 7Post.com, XBimmers.com logo and trademark are properties of BIMMERPOST