|
|
|
02-27-2013, 07:43 PM | #1 |
Private First Class
12
Rep 158
Posts
Drives: 2011 135i Coupe
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: San Diego, CA
|
Hankook V12 vs Kumho XS - is one wider than the other?
I'm getting new tires and want to go a bit bigger than I've been running and I'm wondering which of these 2 tires is less wide than the other. I know some tires run a littler bigger than others even in the same size and I'm going to be cutting it close in the front and would prefer the narrower of these two.
My current setup: Arc-8 18x8.5 +45 with Hankook V12 235/40/18 Arc-8 18x9.5 +62 with Hankook V12 265/35/18 Suspension is completely stock (M performance), fenders are not rolled and I've had absolutely no issues with rubbing on this setup. My future setup: Same wheels with 245/35/18f and 275/35/18r Suspension changes will be Dinan camber plates, BMW Performance Springs, Koni Sports yellows, M3 front control arms From what my current setup looks like and from what I've read, I don't think I'll have any issues with the bigger rears. Please correct me if I'm wrong. In the front, with the added negative camber I'll be getting with the camber plates and M3 arms, I'm pretty sure the 245s will be ok but I'd prefer to get the narrower tire just in case. I've been very happy with my Hankooks and they're a little cheaper than the Kumho's so if they run the same width, I'm apt to stick with them. But if the Kumho's are narrower and/or you guys think they're a much better tire than the Hankook's, I'll go with them. According to the spec sheet on Tirerack, they appear to have the same section width, but I'm no tire expert and not sure if that's all there is to it or is that the final say on the matter - that they're the same width? Anyone have first-hand experience with these two tires? Thanks in advance for your help and advice! P.S. I've read a ton of forum posts and searched a lot prior to posting, so please resist the urge to flame me about using the search tool. |
03-02-2013, 07:50 PM | #2 |
Brigadier General
732
Rep 3,274
Posts |
i know it's been a couple of days, but I'll try to answer as best I can and give you a free bump as well
i haven't had kumhos but I'm thinking of getting them next. I had V12's on stock size wheels and they were pretty good, and then yokohama s.drives slightly stretched on bigger wheels. They were on different wheels, but the yokos seemed to be a little narrower than the V12's and they were available in a few more sizes that made them easier to fit perfectly than the V12's. Next I'm thinking of getting the kumho ecsta SPT's (not the XS) over the s.drives because I hear good things about them. They seem to run either dead-on or a little narrow (definitely not wide), and have pretty rounded shoulders (based on what I've read) so that helps with the rubbing worry. They also seem to get very good all-around reviews from people on these forums and for other cars. I know my searches recently took me to a corvette board and most of the guys in those threads loved them! The thing is, the XS is a max performance tire, and the SPT and the V12 are ultra-high performance. They're in different categories, so they're a little hard to compare unless you compare the SPT to the V12. The XS is pretty TERRIBLE in the rain (and you can kinda guess based on the tread design on them versus the SPT or the V12, way fewer grooves for the water to run into) and they have a shorter tread life than either the V12 or SPT. They also grip better than either, so I would actually rank them among the likes of the Hankook RS3 more than the V12's. Among V12, SPT, and s.Drive, I'd say it's really up to preference. All three have decently rounded shoulders and don't run too wide, though the V12's have very soft sidewalls so I don't know how that would affect the steering feel with big meaty tires. My s.drives definitely had a better steering feel, and the kumhos seem to give good steering feedback as well. If you're still thinking about the XS, then I would get them for the superior dry grip alone if you can live with the shorter comparative tire life and drive carefully in the rain That's my 2 cents. As is, I've tried two out of three, so I might as well give the Kumho SPT's a go and see how they fare versus the other two bargain brands. It's probably easier to get PSS or RE-11 or Star Specs since everyone loves them, but they all have squarer shoulders than the asian brands and I'm dropped on 19x9.5 so I hate cutting it close with fit. Good luck! PS - sorry for the long-ass essay but I've actually been spending this weekend thinking about my next summer tires (I can't seem to get a set of summer tires to last more than a single summer, strange ) so this has been on my mind lol.
__________________
2022 X4 M40i - 2008 135i - 2015 F700GS On Order - 2024 i4 M50 Scruffy's gonna die the way he lived... Mmhm. |
Appreciate
0
|
03-02-2013, 11:38 PM | #3 |
Private First Class
12
Rep 158
Posts
Drives: 2011 135i Coupe
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: San Diego, CA
|
Thanks 1speedbike, I appreciate the feedback! I went ahead and bought the Hankook's since I've had them for the last year+ and they're a known quantity for me. I really liked them and as you mentioned, the Kumho's are definitely better in dry but are awful in wet (but fun). I decided to go with a tire that's a bit cheaper and seems to be better in all conditions, although here in San Diego, I guess I shouldn't be worrying about wet conditions.
The tires will be here on Monday but I'll be waiting to put them on the car until I install my suspension as I'm sure I'll be needing the extra camber to fit the 245s up front. I'll follow-up with this post (or start another one with pics) once I'm done and let folks know if they fit. Thanks again! |
Appreciate
0
|
03-03-2013, 11:37 AM | #4 | |
Brigadier General
732
Rep 3,274
Posts |
Quote:
__________________
2022 X4 M40i - 2008 135i - 2015 F700GS On Order - 2024 i4 M50 Scruffy's gonna die the way he lived... Mmhm. |
|
Appreciate
0
|
Post Reply |
Bookmarks |
|
|