|
|
|
04-08-2013, 03:37 AM | #23 | |
First Lieutenant
371
Rep 339
Posts
Drives: 2022 G80 M3 Competition xDrive
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Sydney
|
Quote:
On the other hand, the M3 lower controls arms are slightly longer than stock, which would give the front wheels slightly more negative camber (0.75 degrees if i'm not mistaken), which would aid turn-in and front end grip through cornering. |
|
Appreciate
0
|
04-08-2013, 04:02 AM | #24 | |
piggy in the mirror
47
Rep 595
Posts |
Quote:
Sure I can fork out for top shelf coilovers which I have done many times in the past, but this 135i street suspension project is a tricky one. I'm going to do it bit by bit using BMW parts so more likely will settle with M3 bushings, FSB & control arms. If I'm still not satisfied then tough I can't have the best of both worlds and expect BMW to warrant any issues I may encounter.
__________________
135i Coupe N55 PPK+JB4
X3 30d LCI |
|
Appreciate
0
|
04-08-2013, 04:22 AM | #25 | ||
Colonel
232
Rep 2,643
Posts |
Quote:
Quote:
The M3 arms are probably the thing that makes the biggest difference in terms of reducing understeer. 1 degree of extra front negative camber makes a big difference for street driving. The stiffer bushings also change the steering feel making it more tactile and giving better feedback. If you only want more negative camber, then Dinan camber plates are a simpler, cheaper mod. On top of that I'd strongly recommend at least getting better dampers as an absolute minimum. I don't think it makes much sense to only do one mod and leaving it at that. What I did with M3 front arms and Performance suspension was a very good outcome for what I wanted. |
||
Appreciate
0
|
04-08-2013, 02:55 PM | #27 |
piggy in the mirror
47
Rep 595
Posts |
That option was mentioned on the previous page, I'm nutting out all options before I decide what to do, its been interesting to hear what others have done with their suspension in order to extract maximum street driving pleasure.
__________________
135i Coupe N55 PPK+JB4
X3 30d LCI |
Appreciate
0
|
04-08-2013, 03:12 PM | #28 | |
Colonel
171
Rep 2,347
Posts |
+1
Quote:
__________________
Mods:-Berkexhaust -alpinaB3flash -CobbAP -Cobb FMIC -ER charge pipe tialQ bov -M3 front sway bar -M3 subframe bushings -M3 front upper and lower control arms -M3 guide rods -M3 rear upper control arms -Mfactory LSD -defiv lockdown kit -TC Kline SA coilovers /camber plates- HP rear toe arms |
|
Appreciate
0
|
04-08-2013, 04:30 PM | #29 |
Colonel
171
Rep 2,682
Posts |
I've read quite a few times on this forum that it reduces understeer in our cars. The theory is that in its stock form, the 'excessive' body roll results in effective positive camber and a reduced contact patch on the outside front wheel during hard cornering. This results in understeer. By reducing this body roll it reduces the roll induced reduced grip by maintaining neutral camber during cornering and thus reduces understeer. That's the theory anyway.
Of course with the addition of more negative camber via camber plates etc it will have an effect on this theory however in reality who knows.
__________________
|
Appreciate
0
|
Post Reply |
Bookmarks |
|
|