Finally Dynoed my 1'er!

[BFD99]

So i decided to see what the 1'er had in her. Mods are DCIs, and JB4. Running Map #2, with half a tank of no ethanol 91 and half a tank of 101 octane!
Best pulls were 351 rwhp and 390 Lbs of tq. I'm loving this car! I need downpipes and meth now! LOL

[OdomPHD]

The sound of your Bimmer is intoxicating.

[BFD99]

Haha thank ya sir!

[jimi900]

did you every dyno your car before the mods?

Jim

[BFD99]

Originally Posted by jimi900

did you every dyno your car before the mods?

Jim

No sir, wanted to but wanted to know the power it was making at the power that i drive it at daily!

[BBK]

You drive daily with half 100octane ?

[BFD99]

Not usually, but every once in a while, i more meant tuned daily vs. stock.

[1speedbike]

Nice man!

Though I think you might have put down better numbers with the autotune map (5). Map 2 is optimized for cars with DPs (though I was told #2 is okay with no DPs, high octane fuel, and an intake).

Still, at the crank I'd figure about 400 hp and 450 ft lbs (assuming 12-13% drivetrain loss)! Great to know that with just a JB4, a DCI, and higher octane gas a 1er can put down those crank numbers

[BFD99]

Originally Posted by 1speedbike

Nice man!

Though I think you might have put down better numbers with the autotune map (5). Map 2 is optimized for cars with DPs (though I was told #2 is okay with no DPs, high octane fuel, and an intake).

Still, at the crank I'd figure about 400 hp and 450 ft lbs (assuming 12-13% drivetrain loss)! Great to know that with just a JB4, a DCI, and higher octane gas a 1er can put down those crank numbers

thanks man. Downpipes will be my next mod.
I've only run map 5 once for about a day and when I did it threw an engine malfunction error so I cleared the code and went back to map 1. Only changed to map 2 today after getting the fuel and running it pretty hard so it would adapt for about 5 miles.

[BimmerEngineer]

Originally Posted by 1speedbike

Nice man!

Though I think you might have put down better numbers with the autotune map (5). Map 2 is optimized for cars with DPs (though I was told #2 is okay with no DPs, high octane fuel, and an intake).

Still, at the crank I'd figure about 400 hp and 450 ft lbs (assuming 12-13% drivetrain loss)! Great to know that with just a JB4, a DCI, and higher octane gas a 1er can put down those crank numbers

You can't make assumptions on power levels from state to state due to TOTALLY different density alititude and ambient temps, etc.. A car in say, The eastern seaboard area (known for below sealevel DA and tracks & dynos at near sealevel in elevation), might run 350hp\400tq at the wheels with outsidde temps of 55*f while the same car, same mods will run 320hp\365tq at the wheels...It's just a fact of location density altitude, actual elevation and amdient temp to name a few ...

[1speedbike]

Originally Posted by BimmerEngineer

You can't make assumptions on power levels from state to state due to TOTALLY different density alititude and ambient temps, etc.. A car in say, The eastern seaboard area (known for below sealevel DA and tracks & dynos at near sealevel in elevation), might run 350hp\400tq at the wheels with outsidde temps of 55*f while the same car, same mods will run 320hp\365tq at the wheels...It's just a fact of location density altitude, actual elevation and amdient temp to name a few ...

That is true, and thank you for pointing that out. I hadn't even thought about where OP was located

However, I wasn't thinking like that when I posted. I was mostly thinking that the autotune map would be the best at "correcting" itself for his particular mods, versus map 2 which was pretty much built for at least DPs, if not FBO without meth. Map 2 is assuming that the turbos have more room to breathe than they actually do in a car without downpipes, which I feel like would have detrimental effects to the output. I could be wrong, though

[BFD99]