FORUMS
- 5
![]() |
|
|
![]() |
| 01-22-2013, 06:59 PM | #67 |
|
Naturally Aspirated Fiend
|
You pay $100,000 (not a typo, one-hundred thousand dollars) less for a full M3 than we do in OZ. No offence, but FU! (I mean that in jest, I know it's not your fault)
__________________
'06 130i M Sport Hatch
|
|
|
|
| 01-22-2013, 07:17 PM | #68 |
|
Major
![]() Drives: Teg DC2 + E82 135i Join Date: May 2011
Location: Easy Bay, CA
|
Yeah, I didn't mean it in a mean way. We do lose out on the better M3 models. Also locally, the M3s are more of a fashion statement than a performance car.
__________________
- Thanks MGallop!Widebody 135i Powered by: Wagner-Tuning & VMR Wheels TheSt|G - "And if you think the 1M got the N54 for any reason other than to keep it slower/cheaper than the M3 you are delusional." |
![]() |
|
| 01-22-2013, 11:46 PM | #69 |
|
Lieutenant Colonel
![]() |
New C63 out next year....likely to be 4WD with Twin Turbo V8 AMG purpose-built....going to be a rush for sure.
Definitely going to be an interesting head to head with the new M3. From the pictures, I think the new M3 looks much better than the new Benz but will reserve final judgement for when I see them in real life. At the moment I would go for a C63 over the M3. A c63 coupe with slightly wider PSS can keep up with a stock M3 no problem and is faster in a straight line of course - esp. with the P31 package. |
![]() |
|
| 01-22-2013, 11:51 PM | #70 | |
|
Lieutenant Colonel
![]() |
Quote:
|
|
![]() |
|
| 01-23-2013, 12:15 AM | #71 |
|
Lieutenant
![]() ![]() ![]() |
i think by straight line standards its way above. maybe it's the corners where it can get a little to loose. (time loss).
|
|
|
|
| 01-23-2013, 01:54 AM | #72 | |
|
Banned
|
Quote:
![]() |
|
|
|
|
| 01-23-2013, 03:23 AM | #73 |
|
Pav is correct as much as i really love the M3 it is by comparison to N54 powered cars SLOW, it has no real get up and go there is no aggression with the power delivery it feels just to smooooooth. Point A to point B it is a fast car BUT you cant beat a turbo car for the raw seat pushing performance.
WHY did BMW not fit the N54 into the E92 M3 i think they stuffed up it should have been an option it could have been the perfect M car.Maybe the next M3 will be the best, i guess we will have to hope the accountants have been locked in the toilet long enough for the engineers to do there magic. Don't get me wrong that little V8 is a gem it sounds like music @ 8000rpm + and seem to be very reliable, more so than the N54. If i eventually own one i will fit a supercharger and have the best sounding M3 ever with some GRUNT. We all know the six sounds like crap when you compare it with the M3 V8 ![]() |
|
![]() |
|
| 01-23-2013, 03:46 AM | #74 | |
|
Colonel
![]() |
Quote:
Here's my take on N54 vs S65. N54 is a rough, raw blonde that wants it hard but bitches and whines too much, and the S65 is the stunning brunette that's always consistent and classy. Reliability definitely goes to the V8.
__________________
![]() JB4 G5 |
|
![]() |
|
| 01-23-2013, 03:53 AM | #75 | ||
|
Banned
|
Quote:
: over the tarty blonde And let's not forget only bald fat old farts drive m3's ![]() |
||
|
|
|
| 01-23-2013, 04:17 AM | #76 | |
|
Major General
![]() ![]() |
Quote:
![]()
__________________
BMW 135i N54 TWIN TURBO
Quarter Mile 12.173@113.70mph - Street Tyres Queensland Raceway Sprint 1:01:22 - Street Tyres Queensland Raceway Clubman 1:04:74 - Street Tyres Lakeside Raceway 1:03:97 - Street Tyres |
|
![]() |
|
| 01-23-2013, 04:33 AM | #77 | ||
|
Banned
|
Quote:
: |
||
|
|
|
| 01-23-2013, 04:56 AM | #78 |
|
force fed Member
|
|
![]() |
|
| 01-23-2013, 06:54 AM | #79 | ||
|
Colonel
![]() |
Quote:
I thought you would like that one.Quote:
__________________
![]() JB4 G5 |
||
![]() |
|
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|