View Single Post
      11-16-2014, 03:43 PM   #195
Artemis
Moderator
Artemis's Avatar
42597
Rep
14,402
Posts

Drives: BMW M2C - BMW X1
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Belgium

iTrader: (0)

Quote:
Originally Posted by Dackelone View Post
@LuuZ check out post #134 in this thread. Also look at: #146, #117 & #118 a few pages back in this thread.
But here is what you need...
Puma number is 49636119-01
new fender liners...
PN: 51718051592
PN: 51718051591
See also posts #1 and #120 @Luuz
http://www.1addicts.com/forums/showp...94&postcount=1
http://www.1addicts.com/forums/showp...&postcount=120

Some reported that some dealers first told them that they're not aware of this issue because the part # are still the same. Few initially even denied retrieving the PuMA in their system until the 1M owner quoted them the PuMA #.

Fender liners are definitely "optimized". The replacement is not invoiced. No paper trail.
Q: "Ah, so resolving the fender liners problem on my car was free of charge ?"
A: "What problem ?" + tongue in cheek smile of dealer.

Likely explanation of the issue: the "indent zone" of the fender liner should be sitting a little lower, more particularly in the tire versus fender liner "contact zone". Could be an indication that BMW 1M test mules may have had less ground clearance (different suspension height ? 18" wheels ?) than the spec of the 1M that went into production in the end ? 1M's sitting a little lower (which had a suspension 'drop') might be less prone to the issue.

__________________
///M is art Artemis
Appreciate 1