View Single Post
      06-26-2008, 11:29 PM   #7
BerkTechnology
Lieutenant Colonel
BerkTechnology's Avatar
223
Rep
1,565
Posts

Drives: Fast
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Irvine, CA

iTrader: (1)

Quote:
Originally Posted by E82TT6 View Post
I agree Dale. I found 12% to be a "safe" number, however I did almost all of my tuning on Mustang Dynos. I found them to be more consistant and realistic than Dynojets.
That's exactly what I said.

"These (Mustang) dyno's will always read ~12% LOWER than a Dynojet"

Stupid vauge pronouns....
Appreciate 0