View Single Post
      06-22-2009, 10:35 AM   #19
tbird
Captain
tbird's Avatar
United_States
31
Rep
683
Posts

Drives: "Bianca" 135cic AW/TC
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: FLL

iTrader: (0)

Garage List
2008 135cic  [0.00]
I discussed the weight issue with the BMW M guy (who by the way is a member of Bimmerpost.com, but requested that I not give his username. Out of courtesy, I will keep it to myself). We both agreed.

What Jeremy is saying is true, about weight being more for frame and crash. Yes, you could start doing the CF for items, and weight saving batteries, and all of that. But let me tell you, doing a "tiny" bit of thrashing on the M3 Coupe, you know what, the extra weight doesn't mean a thing.

If you drive a E92 M3 and you complain that it is not fast enough, then you truly TRULY fall into the category of "Spoiled Rotten Never-Earned-Anything-In-Your-Life Brat" and you truly are wasting the oxygen out of the atmosphere we breathe. If you can't live with 4.1 seconds and you just desperately need to move from $75K price to $300K+ price to have a car that will do 3.6, you are a greedy little POS!

The weight is insignificant. If anything, it makes for a smoother highway ride, more stability in unstable conditions (rain, following 18-wheelers, etc). The M3 has plenty power to handle the weight.
__________________
2008 135cic, Alpine White/Terracotta Leather/BlackTop, Premium Package (Bluetooth, folding mirrors, etc), Sport Package with M Wheel, Navigation, Logic7 with HD and IPod and Sirius, Steptronic, M Aerodynamic Kit

2001 Focus ZX3, modified for fun commuting

Previous
2006 325xi
2002 Audi A4 3.0 Quattro
1997 Audi A4 2.8 Quattro
1984 Audi 4000S Quattro modified
1955 Ford Thunderbird
1969 Camaro modified
1993 Ford Explorer (basic hauling)
1984+1988 Ford Broncos
1993 Honda Civic (Commuter, junk)
2008 Mini (wife's car, AWESOME)
A few more
Appreciate 0