Quote:
Originally Posted by pyrat
I think what they imply is that in real-world situations the M3 will not be able to fully flex its muscles and take advantage of the rev-range which tends to even the playing field with the 1M - and in their opinion make the 1M faster.
If I read that right, I am skeptical and they seem to be finding fault with one of the greatest positives of the M3 - seemingly endless, motorcycle-like revs
|
OK, so they are not saying in actuality the 1m is faster - TOP SPEED - but one can actually utilize this cars power more fully, whereas with the M3 there is a lot of unutilized power in daily driving?
I actually sent an email to the editor requesting an explanation because it is a confusing sentence. I really don't like vagueness.