View Single Post
      04-22-2020, 05:52 AM   #38
Rmtt
Colonel
Rmtt's Avatar
United_States
8211
Rep
2,250
Posts

Drives: 2011 BMW 128i, 2008 LS3 C6
Join Date: Jan 2019
Location: South Carolina

iTrader: (3)

Quote:
Originally Posted by b1aze View Post
I think you're missing the point here....

If additional valve throw through MILVS is BENEFICIAL, it means its a bottleneck. All the porting of a manifold and throttle body in the world won't make much of a difference if your bottleneck is literally the flow through the intake valves in the head. In fact, if its too restrictive when you increase the MAP, it could cause some wonky turbulence or something but I'm just speculating there.

I think its truly asinine to spend all the time and effort on a turbo retrofit when doing MILVS is an afternoon job.
Plus Marty had some dynos showing some substantial gains on N54's while running less boost (~2psi) than they typically see if I'm not mistaken.

At least 2X the gains of a NA engine.
__________________
Everybody has a gameplan....until they get punched in the mouth.
Appreciate 1
b1aze565.50