|
|
|
10-08-2011, 09:28 PM | #1 |
Private
6
Rep 91
Posts |
KW V1/V2 > M sport ?
Hey guys, I have been looking at KW V1 or V2's as a replacement for a while on my E87 but have kept the idea at bay due to the stock M Sport suspension being fun enough. I've actually been in two minds as to whether the KW kit will be much of an improvement over the M Sport factory kit. Part of the reason I bought the car I have is because of the suspension and how good it seems, but I have read a few coupe owners on here praise KW kits over their original M Sport stuff so I thought I'd put it out there and see what others thought.
Any info on price and what ride heights are achievable would be helpful too. So far I've seen K1's for the E87 at around 1300-1500 AUD (postage costs exclusive) Regards Jamie |
10-08-2011, 09:31 PM | #2 |
Major General
161
Rep 4,995
Posts |
Personally I think the V1 are so much better then the stock suspension! In term of quality of ride it really is not that much harsher compare to stock.
in terms of ride height I am currently as low as this and can still go lower. http://www.1addicts.com/forums/showp...&postcount=281 |
Appreciate
0
|
10-08-2011, 09:52 PM | #3 | |
Private
6
Rep 91
Posts |
Quote:
|
|
Appreciate
0
|
10-08-2011, 09:58 PM | #4 |
Banned
91
Rep 3,070
Posts
Drives: A boring one...
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Australia
|
Most aftermarket suspension will be a fair bit better than the stock we run. Especially if you get non run flat's as that makes it softer and a lot more floaty.
|
Appreciate
0
|
10-08-2011, 10:14 PM | #5 |
Private
6
Rep 91
Posts |
I hadnt even thought about how non RFT's might impact the handling, cornering, which is a fair point as I'll probably end up with them in the future, Im sick of my dash sounding like it wants to split in half when i hit a small ridge on the road.
|
Appreciate
0
|
10-08-2011, 10:34 PM | #6 | |
Major General
161
Rep 4,995
Posts |
Quote:
I think Micha3l from the forum is a lot lower then me! http://www.1addicts.com/forums/showp...7&postcount=45 |
|
Appreciate
0
|
10-08-2011, 11:01 PM | #7 | |
Private
6
Rep 91
Posts |
Quote:
|
|
Appreciate
0
|
10-09-2011, 02:08 AM | #8 |
Major General
161
Rep 4,995
Posts |
I think he has v2. As far as I am aware the lowering range are the same across all model.
|
Appreciate
0
|
10-09-2011, 03:33 AM | #9 |
Private
6
Rep 91
Posts |
|
Appreciate
0
|
10-09-2011, 10:20 AM | #10 |
I'm Riley, I'm awesome
30
Rep 696
Posts |
as a fellow E87 owner i can vouch for the improvement a set of non-RFT & wider wheels makes
__________________
Do it properly the first time. |
Appreciate
0
|
10-09-2011, 05:51 PM | #12 |
Lieutenant
30
Rep 491
Posts |
What many people have failed to mention in the past is.. that if you change tyres to the non rft's you are going to be driving a water bed on wheels.
i made this change and now wishing i hadn't. RFT's were the perfect set up with the m sport suspension on my E88... but a lil rough. -Elee |
Appreciate
0
|
10-09-2011, 06:50 PM | #14 | |
I'm Riley, I'm awesome
30
Rep 696
Posts |
Quote:
__________________
Do it properly the first time. |
|
Appreciate
0
|
10-10-2011, 01:37 AM | #15 | |
JDTuning
220
Rep 907
Posts |
Quote:
I am not sure why you guys are not exploring the BC Coilover option. To be quite frank, BC Coilovers and the KW Coilover system "are not comparable." The KW Variant 1, 2 or 3 are not even in the same league as the BC. If you can tolerate a little more noise from the BC than perhaps that of the KW, I would NOT consider anything other than the very expensive KW "Clubsports" to be comparable to the entry level BC's. If you look at my "build" spec list, it should be quite apparent I am not loyal to one particular manufacturer. My first and foremost concern is the utilisation of the best product for the application, regardless of cost (within reason). The BC's are a superbly engineered Coilover system and they are comparatively quite cheap. As such they should be a no-brainer. Just my 2 cents on the matter. Cheers, JD. |
|
Appreciate
0
|
10-10-2011, 02:08 AM | #16 | |
Lieutenant
39
Rep 529
Posts |
Quote:
|
|
Appreciate
0
|
10-10-2011, 02:29 AM | #17 |
JDTuning
220
Rep 907
Posts |
Have you driven on both KW V2's and the cheaper entry level BC's?
I have. FYI, with regards rebound/dampening on the KW's, full soft to full hard had little effect on the ride or handling characteristics. However with the BC's, full soft to full hard was night and day. I can arrange a drive in my car if you wish. (Oh wait, scratch that, I think you are in the US). Anyway I suspect you will throw the piece of paper illustrating the "shock dyno's", right out the window. Lastly with respect to getting "what you pay for", if you buy KW's over BC's you are getting ripped off. How about you ask Peter of Advan Performance, what he really thinks of KW Coilovers. He knows a thing or two about suspension componentry and the KW Variant 1, 2 or 3 would not be on his short list, to say the least. Last edited by JD75; 10-10-2011 at 02:33 AM.. Reason: Typo |
Appreciate
0
|
10-10-2011, 05:02 AM | #18 |
JDTuning
220
Rep 907
Posts |
With respect to the post made by "Sauce",
after speaking to DMM I suspect "Sauce" was referring to Buddy club Coilovers. Where as the BC's that I am referring to, are as I have mentioned before, from Taiwan Bor-Chuann Enterprise Co. I imagine that is where his criticism of the BC Coilovers stems from, as I am told the Buddy club's are built to a price point, with little consideration given to optimum performance. Hey Sauce, feel free to correct me if I am wrong, however if so, WTF. Last edited by JD75; 10-10-2011 at 05:18 AM.. Reason: Typo |
Appreciate
0
|
10-12-2011, 09:07 PM | #19 |
Private
6
Rep 91
Posts |
I've hear that the BC's are a Buddy Club copy...I've also heard about 3 people now complain of two things with them 1. They leaked, and 2. My back hurts.
I bought a BMW because I wanted a car that was engineered to perform well enough but still be comfortable. BC's come with pillowball mounts, which I've had before and absolutely hate, they undo alot of the good work BMW invest to avoid NVH, like double firewalls and state of the art steering/linkage design. I also dont want spring rates that annoy the shit out of me. I'm not knocking your BC's, im just saying that a coilover that is a gun performer at the cost of a harsher ride and increased noise is not for everyone. I did all that crap when I was 19. I had pillow ball top K Sports lowered very far down in my Evo 3, and it was absolute garbage on the road, anoyed me whenever I went anywhere. At the same time I also had AP's in my HSV VXR which was lowered about 80mm. The Astra drove like a factory car, I couldnt beleive that the German built stuff could be that good, so I guess thats why I'm partial to the euro options now...and besides, more often than not, anything other than German is generally japanese market with 8kg/mm + rates and steel tops with spherical bearings. So the optons are slim. It comes down to personal preference, some want a similar ride and a bit better than factory handling but with adjustment, some want outright performance, I'm the former. And I'm not going into the science of shock dyno's but theres design and then theres 'design'. Some of these 'top shelf' monotube units are simply copied by people who dont even know why things are they we they are. They specify rubber over viton etc, lower grade oils, even the shim stacks on the pistons are sometimes made form lower grade cheaper steels. I've even hit a pothole (that wasnt that big) and had a top hat AND a shock rod bend, because it was cheap copied rubbish that looked just like the dearer option but obviously wasnt anywhere near as well built. Im willing to bet the components werent even heat treated properly, or at all. Last edited by One_M; 10-12-2011 at 09:21 PM.. |
Appreciate
0
|
10-12-2011, 09:24 PM | #20 |
Private
6
Rep 91
Posts |
I actually have wondered for a while now if stiffer suspension and Non RFT's would actually make the setup worse, since the stiffer suspension will just transmit more load onto the tyres, that with now softer sidewalls, cant deal with it as well as the RFT's would have.
|
Appreciate
0
|
10-12-2011, 09:25 PM | #21 |
Brigadier General
744
Rep 3,281
Posts |
The V1 kit can be just completely equal to the V2 and V3 KW coilovers, if the latter two are adjusted to the most balanced settings.
The V1 is perfectly balanced for comfort and aggressiveness. It just isn't as adjustable as the more "advanced" kits. I have the ST coilovers which are equivalent to the V1 set and the ride is very close to stock, but the body is so much firmer. Very little body roll at all in corners.. it stays very flat. Plus if you lower the car, you are lowering the center of gravity and improving the handling dynamics. The car just feels so much more confident in turns and in general. I also have non-run flats. The ride quality is great. On small bumps or patches of rough road you do feel it a little more, but not much. This would feel like stock in a less refined or a more sporting type of car. However, on the big bumps or dips, the car feels better because there is much less "bounce" and the car rights itself very quickly. I haven't had RFTs and the suspension on at the same time, so I can't comment on that. I also can't really speak for the BC coils because I've never personally ridden on any vehicle with them. But I know the KW coilovers are of the highest quality. The "balanced" setting (or the only setting for ST/V1) is very close to stock and much sportier than even the M sport (stock 135i, upgraded 128i) suspension. Unless I went with Bilstein or AST, I don't think I'd personally go with any coilover setup but the KW. And even then, I don't know if I'd take them over the KW.\
__________________
2022 X4 M40i - 2008 135i - 2015 F700GS On Order - 2024 i4 M50 Scruffy's gonna die the way he lived... Mmhm. |
Appreciate
0
|
10-12-2011, 09:28 PM | #22 | |
Lord Captain Commander
112
Rep 3,093
Posts |
Quote:
__________________
E82 135i M-sport: SGM/6MT/Black |
|
Appreciate
0
|
Post Reply |
Bookmarks |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|