|
|
|
09-18-2013, 12:32 PM | #1 |
Private
8
Rep 61
Posts |
N54 vs. N55
Looking to buy a used 135i ( 2010 - N54 or 2011- N55) 6SP Man.
Could I ask for input as to which way I should go? Any significant difference in the engines, mod-ability, reliability, etc? |
09-18-2013, 12:36 PM | #2 |
エアーマンが倒せない
288
Rep 2,037
Posts |
It seems to be the overall consensus on the forums that N54 has more mod-ability with less reliability.
Though, from personal experience, I haven't had any problems with my N54. It's a daily driven car that's seen some track time. My dealership has been pretty good to me though; it proactively replaced my HPFP before any kind of failure two different times while in for a servicing.
__________________
|
Appreciate
0
|
09-18-2013, 01:27 PM | #3 |
Lieutenant
21
Rep 493
Posts
Drives: 2010 135i vert
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: Atlanta, GA
|
They both feel different to me. Test drive both and see what you like.
Posted from 1addicts.com App for Android |
Appreciate
0
|
09-18-2013, 01:37 PM | #4 |
Banned
1524
Rep 4,743
Posts
Drives: S65 1M Clone & E92 M3 4.6L
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: San Francisco
|
not to sound rude, but if you search the forum and e90post there is a wealth of information on N55 vs N54s.
|
Appreciate
0
|
09-18-2013, 01:56 PM | #5 | |
Lieutenant
23
Rep 427
Posts |
Quote:
I like my n55 a lot, but I wish I could get a DCI, they just look so much cooler.
__________________
Phobics Build thread
2011 135i alpine white cruising around Boston. |
|
Appreciate
0
|
09-18-2013, 03:08 PM | #6 |
2020 Z4 M40i - 2022 M4C Convt
3157
Rep 5,264
Posts
Drives: 2020 Z4 M40i - 2022 M4C Convrt
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Raleigh, NC - OIB, NC
iTrader: (0)
Garage List 1965 COBRA (FFR rep ... [8.57]
2023 Jeep Wrangler ... [9.50] 2009 Yamaha V-Star [0.00] Cars 2-BMW, 2-FORD, ... [0.00] 2023 Ford Expeditio ... [0.00] 2020 Z4 M40i [10.00] 2022 BMW M4C [7.25] 1998 FORD Ranger 4X4 [0.00] |
Pure stock the N54 is stronger than the N55 even thought BMW rates them the same. The N54 also reacts better to mods than the N55. Finally the N54 got its act together around 2010 & has been reliable since.
Other extras. Outside of the 335is, 1M & similar the very early N54's are stronger than later versions, but have more reliability issues with supporting hardware.
__________________
Kevin
Dravit Gray, Black Leather, Moonlight Roof, Red Calipers 2022 M4C - 2020 Z4 M40i - 2023 FORD Expedition XLT Max 4X4 400BHP - 2009 V-Star - 1998 Ranger 4X4 5MT - 1965 Cobra (R) 5MT - 2023 Jeep Wrangler Sport S 6MT |
Appreciate
0
|
09-18-2013, 04:04 PM | #7 |
Enlisted Member
3
Rep 32
Posts |
one less turbo and supporting hardware to worry about with the N55. you are buying a manual so it does not matter but the DCT is much better than the SMG like N54 tranny. both feel linear to me. i have never driven a turbocharged car with so little lag.
|
Appreciate
2
VRG_135839.50 scythe196920.50 |
09-18-2013, 04:52 PM | #8 |
Lieutenant
21
Rep 493
Posts
Drives: 2010 135i vert
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: Atlanta, GA
|
Posted from 1addicts.com App for Android |
Appreciate
0
|
09-19-2013, 07:49 AM | #10 |
Captain
56
Rep 639
Posts |
__________________
2009 BMW LeMans Blue 135i/Dinan Stage 2 tune/Alufelgen SF-71s/M3 suspension components/Koni Sport adjustable dampers/ETS FMIC/M3 paddle shifters/Alpina B3 TCU flash/VRSF charge pipe
|
Appreciate
0
|
09-19-2013, 10:17 PM | #11 |
Lieutenant
34
Rep 578
Posts |
Guess it depends on how much power you'd be happy with. I think Meth or E85 N55's have pushed near 400HP range where the N54's will be able to get to 430-460 on factory turbo's and then you look into turbo upgrades. I'm sure there's companies out there working on turbo upgrades for the N55 that should push them even further. It also depends on what you want to do with the car, if you want to drag race then you might want to stay away from the 6MT the Auto or DCT cars are faster at the track. They also have a lower HP limit but still seem to be reliable in the 400-450 range.
__________________
2008 135i - MHD/JB4, MS DP's, AMS IC, UI CAI, CDV delete, M3 control arms/Links, RE Toe Link, ECS Trailing Arm, M3 rear SF & Trans bushings, SS brake lines, Michelin PSS.
|
Appreciate
0
|
09-20-2013, 10:26 AM | #12 |
Brigadier General
303
Rep 4,479
Posts |
I think BMW sort of answered that when they put an N54 in the 1M after they had moved to the N55 in the 135i. At that time they clearly thought they could get higher output from the N54 at lower cost or risk than with the N55.
__________________
135i, SGM, Coral, Sport Package, Auto, Premium Hifi, USB/ipod, Apex EC-7s, PPK Stage II
|
Appreciate
0
|
09-20-2013, 10:35 AM | #13 |
Turbo Power
56
Rep 364
Posts |
Everyone always says, oh the N55 has a single turbo compared to the twins on the N54 so it will be cheaper to replace/repair. You have to remember, there are twin scrolls in that single turbo assemble, so it is a complex design as well.
__________________
BSM 135i - CDV Delete | Bilstein | Eibach | M3 FSB | Whiteline
|
Appreciate
0
|
09-20-2013, 05:27 PM | #14 |
Captain
151
Rep 929
Posts |
I think I'm missing something. The technical merits of the N54 and N55 aside, how does this video represent a valid comparison if one car has a Cobb piggyback tune and the other doesn't? Cost aside, wouldn't the N55 win the performance comparison if it had the Cobb tune and the N54 didn't? Not looking to start an argument, just hoping to learn something.
__________________
F87 '16 M2 ... Mineral Grey, 6MT, Exec, MPE Gone: E82 '13 135is 475/586 ... Mineral Grey / Oyster, DCT, Premium, Tech, HK, Michelin PSS, BMW Performance Suspension |
Appreciate
1
VRG_135839.50 |
09-20-2013, 05:34 PM | #15 | |
Banned
1524
Rep 4,743
Posts
Drives: S65 1M Clone & E92 M3 4.6L
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: San Francisco
|
Quote:
|
|
Appreciate
0
|
09-25-2013, 09:51 AM | #16 |
Private
8
Rep 61
Posts |
|
Appreciate
0
|
09-25-2013, 10:13 AM | #17 |
First Lieutenant
9
Rep 385
Posts |
The N54 was already proven and the N55 was new. The M division sticks with what they know works to enhance performance. Plus it's a way to make the car unique. Where else will you get an LCI 1er with an N54? Only in a 1M. They've been known to use previous technology when making their cars while waiting to figure out what to do with the new stuff.
|
Appreciate
0
|
09-25-2013, 11:00 AM | #19 | |
Lieutenant
21
Rep 493
Posts
Drives: 2010 135i vert
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: Atlanta, GA
|
Quote:
|
|
Appreciate
0
|
09-25-2013, 12:11 PM | #20 | |
Second Lieutenant
16
Rep 298
Posts |
Quote:
To OP: There's a trade off. Do you want slightly improved reliability or performance? I chose the n54 because I felt that if anything went wrong I could fix it and you pay to play. If money is an issue or you want a more reliable car the n55 is the way to go. On the other hand going to ~400hp/400tq from a n54 with tune/downpipes/fmic (~1500$) is much more attractive to me lol. You could reach those numbers too with the n55, but that would mean going meth, and meth would make the n55 just as unreliable as a stock n54 if not even more. |
|
Appreciate
0
|
09-25-2013, 03:15 PM | #21 |
Turbo Power
56
Rep 364
Posts |
I have the N54 and the engine sounds raw and more like an M54. The only encounter I had with an N55 was in a 2013 535i and it whined like an electric motor up until 4000 RPM, then it started sounding slightly good. But, nowhere near how my N54 sounded.
I am guessing it's due to the insulation in that car. Still, a BMW should not sound like a damn Lexus. I hope that's not how it sounds in the new 135is. The more next gen BMWs I drive, the more depressed I get about their future products.
__________________
BSM 135i - CDV Delete | Bilstein | Eibach | M3 FSB | Whiteline
|
Appreciate
0
|
Post Reply |
Bookmarks |
|
|