12-30-2011, 12:32 PM | #23 | |
Brigadier General
190
Rep 3,939
Posts |
Quote:
I find it interesting how people don't hesitate to put a part like this on their cars without using any common sense as to what the repercussions could be. |
|
Appreciate
0
|
12-30-2011, 04:46 PM | #24 | |
Captain
8
Rep 704
Posts |
Quote:
The design is not useless. If everyone would then there would be many more useful threads. |
|
Appreciate
0
|
12-30-2011, 06:59 PM | #25 | |
Brigadier General
190
Rep 3,939
Posts |
Quote:
I don't believe everything that everyone tells me just because they are trying to sell a product. I was taught to think by employing knowledge and common sense. Two words for you when it comes to DCI: HEAT SOAK. |
|
Appreciate
0
|
12-30-2011, 09:57 PM | #26 |
Private
3
Rep 78
Posts |
disclaimer: not bias in anyway, just curious as to what the truth is.
quick google search brought up this: http://n54tech.com/forums/archive/in...p?t-13750.html i'm curious to see if there is any evidence that is contrary to these results other than one's "knowledge and common sense". (no offense) |
Appreciate
0
|
12-30-2011, 10:09 PM | #27 | |
Captain
8
Rep 704
Posts |
Quote:
Maybe any of the N54 record holders? Maybe my personal experience, and the fact that I have a load-based dynamometer at my disposal? Have you even logged your car before? Show me data that the DCI doesn't perform better than the stock box. Especially once you run higher boost pressures....... |
|
Appreciate
0
|
12-31-2011, 01:02 AM | #28 | |
Brigadier General
190
Rep 3,939
Posts |
Quote:
|
|
Appreciate
0
|
12-31-2011, 11:11 AM | #29 | |
Colonel
297
Rep 2,898
Posts |
Quote:
Fundahl is right. The difference in temperature of the air coming through the filter is relatively insignificant relative too the amount of heat contributed by the turbos. Colder air is, of course, better but not if it means that the turbos have to work harder to suck it in (and, in doing so, produce even more heat). The AFE stuff is pretty, but the filters are small and I'd be especially concerned about the restricted flow from the enclosed version. Neil |
|
Appreciate
0
|
12-31-2011, 11:53 AM | #30 | |
Brigadier General
190
Rep 3,939
Posts |
Quote:
|
|
Appreciate
0
|
12-31-2011, 12:36 PM | #31 | |
Colonel
187
Rep 2,051
Posts |
Quote:
Has anyone tried taking a stock lid and clearing out all the baffles? I know someone tried making a new lid and it did not work. Only other idea is get the dual cone AFE intake system and make a custom inclosed housing. That would give you the larger surface area and a closed system from heat soaking. |
|
Appreciate
0
|
01-01-2012, 03:16 PM | #32 | |
Captain
8
Rep 704
Posts |
Quote:
These tests have already been done............. Can you read? I said ESPECIALLY at higher boost levels, because most of us don't stay with stock software. Obviously I'm not talking about gains from having a higher dynamic compression from a turbocharger. I'm not going to copy/paste a bunch of data for your lazy ass that I have already read AND tested. It's cool, you can make less power be slower than me, I won't feel bad. |
|
Appreciate
0
|
01-01-2012, 03:18 PM | #33 | |
Captain
8
Rep 704
Posts |
Quote:
If anything you should log your car and watch your puny stock intercooler "heat soak" at stock boost levels...... |
|
Appreciate
0
|
01-01-2012, 03:24 PM | #34 | ||
Brigadier General
190
Rep 3,939
Posts |
Quote:
The information I requested which you obviously don't have is not available. You have a lot to learn, just parroting what you hear/read doesn't make you knowledgeable, you idiot. |
||
Appreciate
0
|
01-01-2012, 03:26 PM | #35 | ||
Brigadier General
190
Rep 3,939
Posts |
Quote:
|
||
Appreciate
0
|
01-01-2012, 03:27 PM | #36 |
Captain
8
Rep 704
Posts |
http://www.n54tech.com/forums/showth...intake+testing
http://www.n54tech.com/forums/showth...intake+testing http://www.n54tech.com/forums/showth...intake+testing As you can see, (if you can read and think), the Mr. 5 intake is the ideal solution. Helix has a solution that fits the 1M. The stock airbox scenario only gets worse and worse as you run higher and higher boost pressures. I don't know about you guys but I enjoy running making more power and hearing more induction sounds.... |
Appreciate
0
|
01-01-2012, 03:30 PM | #37 | |
Captain
8
Rep 704
Posts |
Quote:
I just posted some info dumbass. You are the kid, who has no idea how to make his car faster. Good luck. |
|
Appreciate
0
|
01-01-2012, 03:32 PM | #38 | |
Captain
8
Rep 704
Posts |
Quote:
Might even produce even more of a difference considering it is load-based vs a Dynojet. Maybe you should log your car for once? Do you know how to do that or is that too hard for you? Oh RIGHT, you have to live your life based off of other people's data and opinions and don't need to measure it yourself..... |
|
Appreciate
0
|
01-01-2012, 03:34 PM | #39 | |
Brigadier General
190
Rep 3,939
Posts |
Quote:
I knew there was a certain level of stupidity on these forums, but I didn't know it was this bad. You take the cake! |
|
Appreciate
0
|
01-01-2012, 03:37 PM | #40 | |
Brigadier General
190
Rep 3,939
Posts |
Quote:
Please enlighten us with your data! |
|
Appreciate
0
|
01-01-2012, 03:37 PM | #41 |
Captain
8
Rep 704
Posts |
Lol dude, it's pretty obvious you have nothing to contribute and have no idea what to say so you use some lame ass image from the internet and try to insult me.
I DID have any idea there were people as stupid as you on this forum, and I am not surprised. I bet you didn't even look at the data, you hypocrite. |
Appreciate
0
|
01-01-2012, 03:39 PM | #42 | |
Brigadier General
190
Rep 3,939
Posts |
Quote:
|
|
Appreciate
0
|
01-01-2012, 03:40 PM | #43 | |
Captain
8
Rep 704
Posts |
Quote:
I've already tried to help you, and you don't seem to learn. Looks to me like signs of retardation..... |
|
Appreciate
0
|
01-01-2012, 03:42 PM | #44 | |
Brigadier General
190
Rep 3,939
Posts |
Quote:
|
|
Appreciate
0
|
Post Reply |
Bookmarks |
|
|