|
|
|
11-29-2011, 04:37 PM | #45 | ||
Private First Class
23
Rep 196
Posts |
Quote:
Quote:
__________________
|
||
Appreciate
0
|
12-01-2011, 01:54 AM | #49 |
Private First Class
23
Rep 196
Posts |
We actually upgraded the stage 1 to stage 2...This does not show in the dyno results, though, since we ran in map 0.
__________________
|
Appreciate
0
|
12-04-2011, 07:55 PM | #52 | |
Major General
665
Rep 8,801
Posts |
Quote:
base tq numbers with tune on MAP 0 are high - (should be around 275-280ft-lbs) base whp is on par. have u tried to dyno with the tune completely out and only DP? regardless some good gains, like the community knows from a catless DP. nice new product for the N55.
__________________
FrankiE90 AKA:.[The TANK] *CLICK THE SIG
E90s (been gone but not forgotten) • KW clubsports • • • • • • • • • • 18" BBS GT4 // Build E30 (pending) + E46 M3 Wagon ESTORIL Blue |
|
Appreciate
0
|
12-05-2011, 12:58 PM | #53 | |
Private First Class
23
Rep 196
Posts |
Quote:
__________________
|
|
Appreciate
0
|
12-05-2011, 01:09 PM | #55 | |
Brigadier General
740
Rep 4,635
Posts |
Quote:
__________________
Follow my BMW instagram @CARMODIFICATION Let me know you are from bimmerpost and i'll follow back
|
|
Appreciate
0
|
12-05-2011, 01:57 PM | #56 |
Lieutenant
74
Rep 524
Posts |
Well any chance of working on one soon??
__________________
2010 AW/BLK 135i VM 6465 Single Turbo, JB4 + MHD, VRSF CP & Tial, Big Tom, Fuel-It PI + Stage 3 + Return + Ethanol Sensor, BMW PE, MFactory LSD, Spec 3+ & MFactory SMFW, RB External PCV
Best stock turbo 12.5 @ 19.46 spinning all the way down RIP 2008 AW/BL 135i |
Appreciate
0
|
12-05-2011, 02:20 PM | #57 |
Private First Class
23
Rep 196
Posts |
The idea is simple...The harder break-in helps slightly increase displacement but may affect longevity of the internal components. This is why no 2 dynos are exactly alike - every break-in is different. Also, different tolerances are met during different times of the year depending on temperature - metal expands and contracts differently.
__________________
|
Appreciate
0
|
12-06-2011, 05:26 AM | #59 |
First Lieutenant
12
Rep 317
Posts |
Daniel, can I ask an off topic question (or two)?
Why on earth do you quote 55WTQ? What does that mean? What units are you talking about? Do you mean 55 ft-lb or do you mean 55 Nm? Wheel torque as you have quoted it is not a unit of measure that has any meaning.
__________________
BMW - 135i DCT
Audi - Q5 3.0TDI Last edited by CrustyNoodle; 12-07-2011 at 06:46 AM.. |
Appreciate
0
|
12-06-2011, 09:46 AM | #60 |
Private First Class
6
Rep 145
Posts |
|
Appreciate
0
|
12-06-2011, 02:18 PM | #61 | |
Private First Class
23
Rep 196
Posts |
Quote:
It is industry used lingo - if you wish not to believe this, try a google search: WTQ Since we are in the States, we measure in ft-lbs
__________________
|
|
Appreciate
0
|
12-06-2011, 06:14 PM | #62 |
Lieutenant Colonel
98
Rep 1,647
Posts |
Will this fit on a 335i?
__________________
Current: 2021 X3MC
Past: 2013 bmw 335i, 2011 bmw 335i coupe, 2016 bmw m3 |
Appreciate
0
|
12-06-2011, 08:58 PM | #63 |
Bimmer Newbie
27
Rep 312
Posts
Drives: CSM N54 Prem/Comf/Sound
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Bear's Ass Canada! (Fort Mac)
|
|
Appreciate
0
|
12-07-2011, 06:46 AM | #64 | |
First Lieutenant
12
Rep 317
Posts |
Quote:
But I still don't understand why people in "the industry" who should know better perpetuate the use of a fictitious unit - unless of course they don't know any better!
__________________
BMW - 135i DCT
Audi - Q5 3.0TDI |
|
Appreciate
0
|
12-07-2011, 06:52 AM | #65 | |
Bimmer Newbie
27
Rep 312
Posts
Drives: CSM N54 Prem/Comf/Sound
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Bear's Ass Canada! (Fort Mac)
|
Quote:
|
|
Appreciate
0
|
12-07-2011, 07:48 AM | #66 | ||
Banned
110
Rep 3,177
Posts |
Quote:
Quote:
and it's not just ft-lb like auto manufacturers rate their cars, it's ft-lb to the wheels. hense the wtq. it's an abbrieviation. wftlb is just too clumbsy to use |
||
Appreciate
0
|
Post Reply |
Bookmarks |
|
|