|
|
|
07-25-2008, 09:44 PM | #45 |
Lieutenant
34
Rep 531
Posts |
11.7l/100km CALCULATED for 128 vert. This is EXACTLY the same as my wifes 135 coupe, which she DOESN'T want to burn out the tires before 5000km
__________________
|
Appreciate
0
|
07-25-2008, 10:02 PM | #46 | |
Major General
124
Rep 5,627
Posts |
Quote:
Tom |
|
Appreciate
0
|
07-25-2008, 10:10 PM | #47 |
Major
60
Rep 1,201
Posts
Drives: 2015 M235i, 2017 Tundra
Join Date: May 2008
Location: TX
|
Hmm sounds like I need to get myself a little air compressor
|
Appreciate
0
|
07-26-2008, 09:49 AM | #50 |
Enlisted Member
0
Rep 40
Posts |
TPMS is great but no substitute for a GOOD tire guage and checking every week or every time you fill up for example. IIRC, 10 degrees ambient temp change is almost 1 psi in tire pressure so staying on top of that is a big deal. Especially here in Maryland where "if you don't like the weather, wait 10 minutes" is the norm. It can be 100 degrees last Wednesday, a lovely 82 today. In addition to the safety factor, underinflation can cost you up to 20-25% on mileage.
|
Appreciate
0
|
07-26-2008, 12:04 PM | #51 |
Captain
46
Rep 884
Posts
Drives: 2007 BMW 335i
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: MA
|
If you assume the tire volume is fixed and ideal gas behavior, the following is true:
If P = 35 psi (2.4 bar) @ 77 degF (25 C) 8% decrease (2.8 psi) @ 32 degF (0 C) 5% increase (1.8 psi) @ 104 degF (40 C) The equation is: P2 = P1*(T2/T1) You have to use absolute temperature units though (Kelvin or Rankine). Rankine is 460 + (temp in degF). Kelvin is 273 + (temp in degC). So you are looking at a potentially 4-5 psi change over the seasons, if you never check you tire pressure and it holds air perfectly... a bad idea and a bad assumption.
__________________
Current: 2007 335i sedan
Alpine White | Sports | Premium | Cold | Comfort Access FORMERLY: 128i coupe Alpine White | Sports Package | Black Leather |
Appreciate
0
|
07-26-2008, 05:37 PM | #52 |
Major General
124
Rep 5,627
Posts |
As the ambient air temperature went from about 70oF to 85o over the month or so when my tires all lost 3 lbs. pressure, I'm assuming the run-flats all leak air, albeit very slowly. I keep a small 120v compressor in the garage and carry a 12v one in the trunk to ward off punctures. It's worked so far...
Tom |
Appreciate
0
|
07-29-2008, 02:15 PM | #53 |
Captain
82
Rep 752
Posts |
So my tires are set 35/42 front/rear (Which is for maximum load/maximum speed). As I understand it, low tire pressure has an effect on economy and not high... So there has to be something else going on with my car?
__________________
2019 M-Sport 330i | G20
|
Appreciate
0
|
07-29-2008, 02:59 PM | #54 |
Perfect128
10
Rep 201
Posts |
You are right about the RFT's slowly leaking. I've had my car 2 months and had the TPMS light come on twice. Sure enough, they were down a little. I haven't had the same problem with new standard tires.
|
Appreciate
0
|
07-29-2008, 04:04 PM | #55 | |
Major General
124
Rep 5,627
Posts |
Quote:
Tom |
|
Appreciate
0
|
07-29-2008, 04:36 PM | #56 |
Captain
82
Rep 752
Posts |
I'm not, haha. The dealership gave it to me like that. Do you think lowering the pressure would increase my MPG?
__________________
2019 M-Sport 330i | G20
|
Appreciate
0
|
07-29-2008, 04:43 PM | #57 |
No longer moderate
325
Rep 4,401
Posts |
Your tire pressures are way outta whack. I'd go to 36 front/34 rear to start with and work your way from there. These cars are a bit nose heavy (even the 128i) and can benefit from a bit more pressure up front to help mitigate understeer.
|
Appreciate
0
|
07-29-2008, 09:25 PM | #58 |
Unindicted co-conspirator
67
Rep 1,734
Posts
Drives: to work, mostly.
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania / Detroit, Michigan
|
Probably not -- it's my understanding that higher tire pressure generally leads to lower rolling resistance, and thus higher fuel economy. But I'd make sure that the pressures for front + rear were more in line with each other, I'm not sure what effect 7psi difference between front + rear would have, but it probably isn't helping.
|
Appreciate
0
|
07-30-2008, 01:44 PM | #60 | |
Major General
124
Rep 5,627
Posts |
Quote:
Tom |
|
Appreciate
0
|
07-30-2008, 01:57 PM | #61 | |
First Lieutenant
10
Rep 310
Posts |
Quote:
Though as you put it, engine "breaking" will save tons of gas
__________________
08 E93 M3 | 06 Lotus Exige
|
|
Appreciate
0
|
07-30-2008, 02:42 PM | #62 |
Major
60
Rep 1,201
Posts
Drives: 2015 M235i, 2017 Tundra
Join Date: May 2008
Location: TX
|
the entire time you are in gear w/o touching the gas you are using less gas than idleing....i usually dont shift ever single gear though I usually let 6 drop to 1k then shift down to 3rd then let the rpms go down to 1k again then complete my stop
|
Appreciate
0
|
07-30-2008, 04:25 PM | #63 |
New Member
1
Rep 20
Posts |
128i in San Antonio
I have 5521 miles logged, and best tank was 33.94 mpg and worst tank was 27.86. It's usually in the 31 to 32 mpg range. I just returned from S.A. to Houston to Corpus Christi to S.A. vacation and averaged 30.40 mpg. Mostly highway and air-conditioned.
|
Appreciate
0
|
07-30-2008, 05:05 PM | #64 | |
First Lieutenant
10
Rep 310
Posts |
Quote:
I use engine braking riding/racing 4 stroke dirt bikes, it's great for momentum through rough sections; and to keep busy/tired hands from having to grab a big strongly sprung clutch, but I don’t think it's saving you anything on gas, and causing wear you don't want on one of the most expensive components on the car.
__________________
08 E93 M3 | 06 Lotus Exige
|
|
Appreciate
0
|
08-01-2008, 07:23 AM | #65 |
1st Class
13
Rep 199
Posts |
Highway: ~30mpg
Around town/ spirited 16-19mpg Mix 20-22mpg I have about 7200 miles on mine so far.
__________________
2008 128i Montego/Terra 6MT, Sport, Xenon, CA
|
Appreciate
0
|
08-02-2008, 08:59 AM | #66 |
New Member
5
Rep 15
Posts |
could be 'cause 128ers get auto transmission more often. according my trip computer i'm averaging 25.5 mpg. 30%/70% city/highway. i'm too lazy to calculate real gas consumption though.
|
Appreciate
0
|
Post Reply |
Bookmarks |
|
|