View Poll Results: Which one? | |||
I like the old M2's interior better | 40 | 45.45% | |
I lihe new M2C's interior better | 48 | 54.55% | |
Voters: 88. You may not vote on this poll |
Post Reply |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
08-18-2018, 11:34 AM | #23 | |
Brigadier General
2354
Rep 4,254
Posts |
Quote:
And I mean the bottoms are the same, the upper shoulders add a bit of bolstering though that's it.
__________________
///M Power
|
|
Appreciate
0
|
08-18-2018, 01:56 PM | #24 | ||
Major
690
Rep 1,339
Posts |
Quote:
|
||
Appreciate
0
|
08-21-2018, 03:54 AM | #26 |
Major General
7334
Rep 7,297
Posts |
I don't understand this thread since the only change is in the seats. If the mounting hardware is exactly the same as in the M3 then I think this seat does sit lower. We'll need measurements though to be sure.
|
Appreciate
0
|
08-22-2018, 11:50 AM | #28 |
Lieutenant
1184
Rep 571
Posts |
That's correct. The seat shape/style from the M3/M4 doesn't have the thigh extender. The M2C seats aren't an unqualified upgrade, they're just a different seat with their own features, benefits and shape. If you've sat in both and find that your body shape and size fit the original seat better, or you make regular use of the thigh extender, or you benefit from having a height-adjustable headrest, you'll consider the M2C seats a downgrade. Likewise, many people will fit better in the new M2C style. I believe seats should be chosen not on the basis of whether they light up behind your back, but for the way the car will be used, your body fit, and whether you can sit in them for 2 hours without needing Percoset.
|
Appreciate
1
akkando5864.50 |
Post Reply |
Bookmarks |
|
|