11-10-2011, 04:05 AM | #23 |
I dont drive fast,I just fly low....
15
Rep 49
Posts |
I have heard this quite a bit at dealers down here as well.
This is what the salesman and parts guys say: it is not a true M car as it was an after thought by BMW as a marketing ploy and does not have any unique M charcateristics built specifically for the car. It borrows the N54 engine from two other models and borrows some M bits on suspension from the M3. It also has no DCT option, the M button on the steering is of no significance etc . Some magazines have also being critical on BMW not producing a specific perhaps 3.5 litre engine etc. They indicated that many 135i owners have added all the suspension, diff and brake upgrades to there 135i's already before BMW so how can this car be a true M as BMW copied the 135i fraternity... So this BS is going around alot, they say its a limted edition 135i...... and that drivers who want a true M car must buy the m3.... |
Appreciate
0
|
11-10-2011, 04:11 AM | #24 | |
Captain
69
Rep 632
Posts |
Quote:
Why? Well I like the fact that I have very usable performance from very low revs, I love the shove you get in the back from the turbos boosting up, I love the sound the turbos make, the list goes on.... Don't get me wrong, I do like NA cars, however I do think their time is ticking just with the way fuel prices are going (especially here in the UK!). Give me a car that I need to rev the living daylights out of which has very little torque in comparison or a turbo car that I can use the immense torque on to waft past most other cars and I'll snap your hands off for the turbo. In most modern day driving situations, sitting on a motorway doing 60mph and wanting to overtake the car in front, I don't want to have to drop a gear and thrash the car (making a bit song and dance in the process) just to pass the car in front, whilst I get 15-16mpg in the process! I want to be able to leave it in 4th or 5th gear and use a massive wallop of torque. The fact that I can do that and still not really suffer at the pumps in the process is an added bonus. Plus if you're going to remap a car, put a remap on an NA car and you may get 10-15bhp if you're lucky. Do the same with a turbo car and it's more like 50-60bhp. Yes NA cars sound nicer, but my 1M doesn't exactly sound like a bag of old nails. In fact, I've had a lot of very positive comments about it's sound |
|
Appreciate
0
|
11-10-2011, 04:29 AM | #26 |
Major General
2816
Rep 7,637
Posts |
Well I had the opposite comments from the salesman's and tech guys on delivery of my 1M.. All I got was, "why would you buy an M3 if you could have this"...
|
Appreciate
0
|
11-10-2011, 07:21 AM | #27 |
Major
40
Rep 1,058
Posts |
I love how the same idiot salepeople who claim it's not a real M car are also trying to get $10K over sticker. I'm turning all of my M badges upside down and I'm going to start calling a BMW 1W coupe...problem solved.
__________________
The faster you go, the better it feels
Last edited by ESC OFF; 11-10-2011 at 09:32 PM.. |
Appreciate
0
|
11-10-2011, 07:35 AM | #28 |
Captain
37
Rep 615
Posts |
should change it to W16
__________________
VO 1M - everything except sunroof
RIP BSM 135i 2009-2011 |
Appreciate
0
|
11-10-2011, 08:17 AM | #30 |
Brigadier General
183
Rep 3,939
Posts |
I was on the phone with a guy from the parts department at my dealer, to ensure they have the proper fluids for my 1200 mile service this coming Saturday. Somewhere in the conversation I asked if the full synthetic 5w30 oil will be used (just for reassurance) to which replied "yes, that's the same oil that all other bmw's get since this is not a real M car, I mean the engine is not...it's still an N54 engine..."
I ignored it and kept about the conversation, but I will see him this Saturday and ask him what he has to say of the new M5...or the upcoming M3 for that matter. Some people simply don't understand. Now mind you, this person was completely unaware of the existence of mtf-lt5 and insisted that the required fluid was lt3, adding that I shouldn't believe everything I see online. Again, some people do not understand the difference between educated research and simply googling something...he stood corrected after calling BMW and being informed of lt5 indeed. |
Appreciate
0
|
11-10-2011, 08:27 AM | #33 |
Lieutenant
26
Rep 401
Posts
Drives: 2011 Saphire Black 1M Coupé
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: 300km to the Nordschleife
|
I've never been phased by this "M vs. Non-M" bs. I don't care about the sticker. It's just a product name, essentially no more. The thing that is important to me is if it's my car or not. Will it make me grin? Each and every day? And this one does. The M3 didn't and I had it for three years. Again that is not saying, that the M3 is a bad car. No, it's not. It was just never my car. And once you mention that to "those" people, they will look at you like you are a pink elephant with poka-dots. All they know is what they read and those that write know little more. How long have they driven the cars... hours, minutes? And they know? Yeah, sure. My answer would simply have been "there is a point when it is better to just shut up, if one has no idea what one is talking about". Very politely and calmly spoken.
__________________
The best piece of road - worldwide.
|
Appreciate
0
|
11-10-2011, 08:39 AM | #34 |
Private First Class
20
Rep 157
Posts |
Guys who cares. Look, dynos are coming soon to speak for themselves. But i'll tell you this much.
Last week I had to run a dyno for the sponsors of the Clockwork Orange build. There were 2 M3's there. I'll get into the full adventure when I have time to make the full write up but to cut to the chase, the 1M stock baseline was 346whp (I won't even get into torque...yet... Or the after results either...yet). M3 guys were hitting 340whp. So when it comes to power, there is no envy. It's smaller, more nimble. Simply put, this is what the e30M3 should've have evolved to. After that day, whenever I hear someone say that I just answer 'keep telling yourself that' or 'if you say so'. Whatever helps them sleep better! |
Appreciate
0
|
11-10-2011, 08:43 AM | #35 | |
Major
168
Rep 1,479
Posts
Drives: 2017 F80 M3
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Houston, TX
|
Quote:
__________________
_______________________
1991 E30 M3/Brilliantrot 2017 F80 M3/AW |
|
Appreciate
0
|
11-10-2011, 08:53 AM | #36 | |
Brigadier General
183
Rep 3,939
Posts |
Quote:
|
|
Appreciate
0
|
11-10-2011, 08:57 AM | #37 | |
Second Lieutenant
61
Rep 234
Posts |
Quote:
Why would they be changing the gearbox oil? Since it's not mandated in the US is the dealer going to cover the service? With all of the horror stories involving the wrong LT fluid, I'm definitely going to do this myself. I want them to read codes and change the engine oil and thats it. And they better not wash it either. |
|
Appreciate
0
|
11-10-2011, 08:59 AM | #38 | ||
Brigadier General
183
Rep 3,939
Posts |
Quote:
|
||
Appreciate
0
|
11-10-2011, 09:01 AM | #39 |
Brigadier General
829
Rep 4,190
Posts |
|
Appreciate
0
|
11-10-2011, 09:10 AM | #41 | |
Brigadier General
183
Rep 3,939
Posts |
Quote:
Everything else is simply an inspection, oh and they know me very well at the dealer...they know better than to put my car through a car wash |
|
Appreciate
0
|
11-10-2011, 09:14 AM | #42 |
Banned
262
Rep 5,018
Posts
Drives: VALNCYA
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Jersey
|
Here goes the engine thread again !
|
Appreciate
0
|
11-10-2011, 09:15 AM | #43 |
Major
40
Rep 1,058
Posts |
That's proof...definitely not a "M"... it's better!
__________________
The faster you go, the better it feels
|
Appreciate
0
|
11-10-2011, 09:20 AM | #44 |
Brigadier General
183
Rep 3,939
Posts |
That's insanely underrated...assuming a 15% drivetrain loss, this equates to 407hp at the crank!
|
Appreciate
0
|
Post Reply |
Bookmarks |
|
|