|
|
|
05-01-2008, 09:22 PM | #23 | |
New Member
0
Rep 26
Posts |
Quote:
Just my two cents. Nothing is free. |
|
Appreciate
0
|
05-02-2008, 11:36 AM | #24 | |
Banned
57
Rep 1,396
Posts |
Quote:
We're also part of a group of companies in an 1-25 corridor traffic and pollution abatement coalition. The company provides special parking for van pools, special parking for scooters and motorcycles, free bus passes for people who choose to commute by bus, etc. So while it won't be free, I'm going to guess that at least until plug-in cars become the norm, that my company will be happy to provide the electricity gratis, as a perk and incentive to help the environment. I wouldn't even be too surprised if they reserved some premium parking places for plug-in cars, and added dedicated charging stations just to encourage folks to buy plug-in cars. One of the interesting side benefits for me of charging at work, is that because my company buys wind-generated power through Xcel energy's WindSource program, my electric car would be nearly pollution free. Not a single drop of oil, liter of natural gas, ton of coal, or ounce of uranium would be consumed to power it. |
|
Appreciate
0
|
05-02-2008, 01:00 PM | #26 | |
Second Lieutenant
3
Rep 207
Posts |
Quote:
|
|
Appreciate
0
|
05-02-2008, 01:45 PM | #27 |
Major
28
Rep 1,000
Posts |
The US now has LSD and ULSD. The fuel is in place. The car companies need to start offering the cars. Real car nuts are not going to buy them. They do not rev up like the gas burners. 50mpg sounds nice. But at what cost? $4.20 a gallon and going up daily. Ouch!
|
Appreciate
0
|
05-02-2008, 03:07 PM | #28 | |
form follows function
38
Rep 838
Posts |
^ did ya miss the thread?
Quote:
|
|
Appreciate
0
|
05-04-2008, 11:34 PM | #29 | |
Banned
10
Rep 64
Posts |
Quote:
|
|
Appreciate
0
|
05-04-2008, 11:35 PM | #30 |
Banned
10
Rep 64
Posts |
|
Appreciate
0
|
05-05-2008, 07:50 PM | #31 |
Private First Class
4
Rep 131
Posts |
|
Appreciate
0
|
05-05-2008, 09:47 PM | #32 |
Banned
10
Rep 64
Posts |
|
Appreciate
0
|
05-05-2008, 10:19 PM | #33 |
Private
3
Rep 72
Posts |
|
Appreciate
0
|
05-05-2008, 10:45 PM | #34 |
Major
58
Rep 1,201
Posts
Drives: 2015 M235i, 2017 Tundra
Join Date: May 2008
Location: TX
|
Here you go your electric car is coming out soon..... not a BMW but seems pretty nice but the cost is pretty huge also http://www.teslamotors.com/
$109,000 0-60 in 3.9 seconds range 220 approx. top speed a little lacking but not bad for an electric 120mph 248hp peak |
Appreciate
0
|
05-06-2008, 03:45 AM | #35 |
Captain
145
Rep 917
Posts
Drives: 2015 BMW M Sports Convertible
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Auckland New Zealand
|
Hybrid, [COLOR=#000000! important][COLOR=#000000! important]fuel-cell[/COLOR][/COLOR] and all-electric vehicles are viewed by many as the future of the motoring world but there is a growing fear that the flow of electrical current from the motors that power such vehicles produces harmful magnetic fields, which some scientists associate with a number of health risks including increased risk of cancer. Magnetic fields are all around us in our everyday lives – produced by everything from mobile phones to hair dryers – but in the case of an EV or hybrid prolonged exposure because of high power cables located close to the driver and passengers could compound the effects.
Initial tests on current [COLOR=#000000! important][COLOR=#000000! important][COLOR=#000000! important][COLOR=#000000! important]hybrid [COLOR=#000000! important]vehicles[/COLOR][/COLOR][/COLOR][/COLOR][/COLOR] using simple hand-held meters are starting to show alarming results, reports The New York Times. Furthermore, the National Institutes of Health and the National Cancer Institute acknowledge the potential hazards of long-term exposure to a strong electromagnetic field and the harmful effects of living near high-voltage utility lines. Currently, there is no regulatory standard over what level of exposure constitutes a health hazard or what should be the maximum limit, however carmakers such as Honda and Toyota claim internals tests have shown there is no risk to motorists. Researchers are still sitting on the fence, saying there’s no need to be alarmed but the potential health risk should not be ignored either. |
Appreciate
0
|
05-06-2008, 09:31 AM | #36 | |
Enlisted Member
92
Rep 32
Posts |
Quote:
Personally I prefer gasoline engines because you can't rev a diesel up to 7000rpm. |
|
Appreciate
0
|
05-06-2008, 12:05 PM | #37 |
Private
0
Rep 58
Posts |
Interesting article on Urea Injection:
http://autoweek.com/apps/pbcs.dll/ar...024/LATESTNEWS I welcome diesel. Especially if the emission can be keep in check. In North America, diesel had a bad rep it didn't deserve. We should give it another chance. Hybrid and electric car will fill and land fill with dead batteries and far from viable. |
Appreciate
0
|
05-07-2008, 12:23 AM | #38 |
form follows function
38
Rep 838
Posts |
does any automotive manufacturer offer a "performance"-oriented diesel in the US? wanting to test drive to get a feel of what a small, sporty, decent output diesel would feel like
|
Appreciate
0
|
05-07-2008, 12:06 PM | #39 |
Banned
57
Rep 1,396
Posts |
The closest would be the Mercedes Benz E320 BlueTec. It isn't exactly a performance car, or small, or sporty. But it does 0-60 in 6.6 seconds, which will beat the pants off the only other diesel cars I know of that you could currently drive in the US market, which are the 2006 and earlier VW TDI's.
|
Appreciate
0
|
05-07-2008, 01:42 PM | #40 |
form follows function
38
Rep 838
Posts |
yeah the TDIs are the only ones i can think of but thats not enough performance to get a feel for what kind of impression a "sporty" diesel would leave. thanks.
|
Appreciate
0
|
Post Reply |
Bookmarks |
|
|