|
|
|
07-18-2007, 02:12 PM | #23 | |
Lieutenant
38
Rep 570
Posts |
Quote:
My first reactions to this car were pretty negative, but I am coming around and now find it easier to set aside the specific design faux pas around headlights etc. So it was a bit of a shock to see the comments on today's 1 coupe posting on the Jalopnick.com auto blog - there are a LOT of folks out there who think this is one ugly duckling. And considerable outrage over the lack of a LSD which leads some to state that the 1 series is just a poser as a driver's car. Oh well, if sales are slow that should make it easier to get hold of one, and at a reasonable price... |
|
Appreciate
0
|
07-18-2007, 03:22 PM | #24 | |
Brigadier General
565
Rep 3,742
Posts |
Quote:
Yes, there appears to be a lot of criticism on both matters (exterior and LSD). If BMW NA misses the mark on the MSRP there will be plenty of 1er coupes sitting on Center lots. |
|
Appreciate
0
|
07-18-2007, 03:33 PM | #25 | |
Lieutenant Colonel
37
Rep 1,680
Posts |
Quote:
please correct me if i'm wrong about these. it might be an ugly duckling ... to each their own ... but this other seems unrealistic criticism. |
|
Appreciate
0
|
07-18-2007, 05:15 PM | #26 | |
Lieutenant
37
Rep 582
Posts |
Quote:
The 135 seems to be blurring the line between M models and standard models w/ its standard big 'ole motor, M-aerokit and M bits in the interior. If it doesn't get and LSD (or some sort of device that mimics an LSD) then the fun factor for me has just been seriously reduced. Why bother putting so much power into the car if it can't 100% be taken advantage of? Why do you think Vishnu installed an LSD into their 335 as soon as they could? I still like the car and am considering it, but the upgrade path now necessitates an extra $2k for an LSD. And that's after a suspension upgrade (don't loose traction in the first place). -Mahlzeit |
|
Appreciate
0
|
07-18-2007, 05:16 PM | #27 | |
Brigadier General
565
Rep 3,742
Posts |
Quote:
No, the 335 does not have a LSD and that is a big complaint of many track junkies. I do not know about the 2002, but the '87-'90 E30 325is and the '87-88 E28 528is had an LSD |
|
Appreciate
0
|
07-18-2007, 05:40 PM | #28 |
Lieutenant Colonel
37
Rep 1,680
Posts |
yeah i certainly appreciate that a LSD is needed to optimize this car.
it just seems to me that this car stock is a balance of cost and performance and should be measured by that standard. if the rumors of bmw performance parts being released are true then i think that must be a compromise ... allow people to upgrade yet still provide the reasonably priced version for the mass market that meets their desired price-point. personally i was planning on a 335i but never really was a big fan of its look and didn't need the larger car... the option of a 135i fit me perfectly. and yeah i'll prob drop many mods into it as well |
Appreciate
0
|
07-19-2007, 01:15 AM | #29 | |
Lieutenant
38
Rep 570
Posts |
Quote:
|
|
Appreciate
0
|
07-19-2007, 01:54 PM | #30 | |
Second Lieutenant
6
Rep 289
Posts |
Quote:
As far as the lack of an LSD, well, if a 335i that weighs more, has lesser brakes, and supposidely a softer suspension can out run an RS4 at VIR, I would say this car is going to be quite a performer. A poser as a drivers car? I think not... |
|
Appreciate
0
|
07-21-2007, 10:42 AM | #31 | |
Lieutenant
37
Rep 582
Posts |
Quote:
Speculation is so annoying, I just want to drive it and see. |
|
Appreciate
0
|
07-21-2007, 10:48 AM | #32 | |
Unofficial Official "IN"
3
Rep 138
Posts |
Quote:
|
|
Appreciate
0
|
07-21-2007, 12:20 PM | #33 | |
Second Lieutenant
246
Rep 223
Posts
Drives: 2022 M3 Comp, 2021 X7
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Southlake, Texas
|
Quote:
__________________
--2024 X5 M60i XDrive - Frozen Black Metallic
--2007 Porsche 911 GT3 - Black/Black 6MT |
|
Appreciate
0
|
07-21-2007, 01:23 PM | #34 |
Moderator
559
Rep 4,240
Posts |
Haha, I know. There goes all of his credibility.
__________________
- 04 Honda S2000(gone)
|
Appreciate
0
|
07-21-2007, 07:57 PM | #35 |
Private First Class
6
Rep 123
Posts |
nice shots!
I am sick for them as well. My wife doesn;t want to hear about the 135 any more. Even my car crazed friends are also starting to roll there eyes... can';t wait to see one in the flesh! THen drive one..... |
Appreciate
0
|
07-22-2007, 12:08 AM | #36 |
New Member
0
Rep 26
Posts |
first time i saw pics of the 135i the only thing i could say was "wow what an ugly car." but man has things changed. im like addicted to this car now and im loving these pics, i just hate that awful sedona red color!
__________________
[SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]
|
Appreciate
0
|
07-22-2007, 01:59 AM | #37 |
Major General
417
Rep 6,968
Posts |
You took the words out of my mouth. WTF. to :biggrin:
|
Appreciate
0
|
07-23-2007, 10:50 AM | #38 |
Unofficial Official "IN"
3
Rep 138
Posts |
How so? The 335 has no pull, you can barely tell that its a bi turbo system. In an essence thats good, but bad for the performance minded looking for raw power. Have you driven both a 335i coupe and e46 M3? Driven them hard?
I have.... I can say I prefer my M3 over that car, but with that same motor(N52) in a smaller, slightly lighter car there might be a difference. I guess I shouldnt say it would beat the E46 in a straight line. It might... Im only speculating this because BMW called a 5.3 in the 335i 0-62. Meanwhile, it did it in 4.9. So, the 135i should be quicker. Those times are already quicker than the E46 M3. If and this is a big IF, the 135i does have an M suspension package, I hope that it is better than the e46 M. Theres no reason why it shouldnt be. BMW has had plenty of time to perfect this car. And face it, even though none of us have driven the E92 M, its not getting very good reviews (past a good suspension and frame). Maybe it will be the best handling M, but I highly doubt it. Its large and heavy. Take for instance, a GXP-R vs GT Porsches in the Rolex Cup, theres no comparison there. The porsches are much more nimble. We might be seeing the same thing here with the 135 and new M. Should we? Heck no, the M should be the top dog, but again until we have all three cars to test its all speculation. |
Appreciate
0
|
07-23-2007, 11:26 AM | #39 |
Lieutenant Colonel
37
Rep 1,680
Posts |
i believe their point was that the 335i actually has more peak torque (300 ft-lbs) than the e46 m3 (255 ft-lbs) yet you claimed the 335i had "zero torque".
i haven't compared dyno charts so i'm not exactly an expert on this. :drinking: |
Appreciate
0
|
Post Reply |
Bookmarks |
|
|