05-13-2011, 05:26 AM | #1 |
Captain
195
Rep 657
Posts |
Autozeitung: 1M vs RS3
Audi RS3
test weight - 1622kg 0-100km/h - 4,2s 0-160km/h - 10,2s 0-200km/h - 16,8s 100-0km/h cold/warm - 34,4m/33,9m slalom 18m - 66,8 km/h laptime - 1:40,3 s BMW 1M test weight - 1522kg 0-100km/h - 4,5s 0-160km/h - 9,8s 0-200km/h - 16,3s 100-0km/h cold/warm - 35,2m/33,7m slalom 18m - 68,1 km/h laptime - 1:39,4 s http://www.**************.com/intern...vs-bmw-1m.html Thnaks to emve for the result. |
05-13-2011, 07:18 AM | #5 |
Private First Class
1
Rep 155
Posts |
The RS3 is more things to more people, I get it.
However, I never wanted or considered an RS3 but now I know it can carry a greater payload....... .... I still don't want one! |
Appreciate
0
|
05-13-2011, 08:38 AM | #7 |
Captain
39
Rep 812
Posts |
Do BMWs have a much worse warranty than Audi? 8 points lost there! :-)
Agree with the above though - I can live with less front (5 points) and rear space (14 points) and a lower "variablity" score (what does that actualy mean in relation to "Body". Do the RS3s rear seats turn round to make a picnic area or something - whatever, another 15 points gone!). Damn, I've been suckered into playing the points, not the emotion game
__________________
2019+ BSM M2C 2011-2012: VO 1M Coupe, many toys, Evolve Stage 3. 2008-2011: 135i M Sport Le Mans Blue / Lemon / HGSL. Evolve OBD remap - 390bhp. Also in the family: X3 M40d / Audi S4 (V8)
|
Appreciate
0
|
05-13-2011, 08:57 AM | #8 | |
Private First Class
3
Rep 117
Posts |
Quote:
|
|
Appreciate
0
|
05-13-2011, 09:43 AM | #10 |
Captain
146
Rep 697
Posts
Drives: M3 F80 silverstone
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: austria
|
conclusion is:
the rs3 is the better allround daily driver whereas the 1M is an "uncompromising, razor-sharp - track tool" so what would i prefer?
__________________
if you're cast on thin ice, you may as well dance
enjoy your cars |
Appreciate
0
|
05-13-2011, 10:04 AM | #11 |
Second Lieutenant
4
Rep 202
Posts |
|
Appreciate
0
|
05-13-2011, 10:05 AM | #12 |
Private First Class
3
Rep 117
Posts |
Auto Motor und Sport came to the same conclusion and awarded the RS3 more points for steering in their comparison test as they found the 1M's steering "unnecessarily heavy & somewhat insensitive"
|
Appreciate
0
|
05-13-2011, 01:08 PM | #13 |
Captain
39
Rep 812
Posts |
Ahhh... yes - fair points then
__________________
2019+ BSM M2C 2011-2012: VO 1M Coupe, many toys, Evolve Stage 3. 2008-2011: 135i M Sport Le Mans Blue / Lemon / HGSL. Evolve OBD remap - 390bhp. Also in the family: X3 M40d / Audi S4 (V8)
|
Appreciate
0
|
05-13-2011, 01:22 PM | #14 |
Lieutenant
31
Rep 515
Posts |
a car with that weight and "only" 340 HP deserves more than 40/100 for traction when it does 4,5 sec. to 100 km/h. Or am i becoming retarded?
__________________
"... on the smiles-per-mile charts, the 1-series M coupe can't be beat. It is a challenging piece, a triple-X-rated driver's machine for semi-professionals. Its handling balance provides an open invitation to indulge in latent oversteer, and provides an opportunity to separate the men from the boys. It is an absolute hoot on the track and an addictive plaything on your favorite twisty back road. "
|
Appreciate
0
|
05-13-2011, 03:32 PM | #15 |
Major
14
Rep 1,044
Posts |
i saw this too. makes no sense. of course the awd will have more traction. i dont know why they even have this category when the comparing awd vs rwd. in terms of driving dynamics i would prefer the rwd with 'less' traction
|
Appreciate
0
|
05-13-2011, 03:51 PM | #16 | |
Second Lieutenant
4
Rep 202
Posts |
Quote:
Anybody who's actually driven one want to comment? |
|
Appreciate
0
|
Post Reply |
Bookmarks |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|