|
Post Reply |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
03-27-2012, 11:54 PM | #1 |
Brigadier General
275
Rep 3,164
Posts
Drives: Many
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: North of 7K RPM
iTrader: (1)
Garage List 2020 BMW M2 CS [0.00]
1994 Audi RS2 Avant [0.00] 2021 Audi RS6 Avant [0.00] 1988 BMW E30 M3 [0.00] 2011 BMW 1///M [0.00] 2017 BMW F80 M3 30 ... [0.00] 2018 Porsche 991.2 GT3 [0.00] 2015 Porsche Macan ... [0.00] 1998 Porsche 993 C4S [0.00] 1994 Lancia Delta I ... [0.00] 2008 Audi RS4 [0.00] |
Like modding cars and preserving warranty? Audi is not the car for you
This is the latest chapter in the "Manufacturer vs Tuner" wars. Audi of America has laid down the hammer hard, and already there are several instances where warranty has been denied by AofA on modded (TD1) cars (mostly B8 S4s).
And the whole statement from aftermarket tuners that 'our tune is undetectable' is being seriously tested. Hoping BMW doesn't go this route:
__________________
2011 BMW E82 1///M: AW, all options; Renntech, Akrapovic, Forge, P3, RevoZ CF bits, many mods
1988 BMW E30 M3: Hennarot, S14, stock 2018 Porsche 991.2 GT3: PtS, CXX, LWBS, PCCB 1998 Porsche 993 C4S: Zenith Blue, last aircooled widebody, Bilstein PSS10, Fister II + Fabspeed exhaust 2008 Audi B7 RS 4: Sprint Blue, Audi Exclusive Euro Bucket Interior, Premium+Titanium, many mods |
03-28-2012, 01:33 AM | #3 |
Captain
22
Rep 908
Posts |
Well, it makes a messed up kind of sense. If Audi can't get around the Magnuson-Moss Act then just put it in writing that modding voids the warranty. I'm not a lawyer so don't know if this would hold up to a legal challenge but by doing this Audi can say that the owner "voluntarily" forfeited warranty coverage
__________________
Vorsprung durch Gas Geben!! 172 of 740 |
Appreciate
0
|
03-28-2012, 01:41 AM | #4 |
Captain
57
Rep 639
Posts
Drives: E92 335i
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Socal
|
__________________
cheap fast cars arent reliable reliable cheap cars arent fast and fast reliable cars ARENT CHEAP |
Appreciate
0
|
03-28-2012, 01:43 AM | #5 |
Captain
119
Rep 898
Posts
Drives: '69 GT3, GT4, 1M, 912
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: SF Bay Area, Shenzhen, Oman
|
Frankly, I can't blame them. There is no doubt that raising the redline/ re-calibrating the car for more power will often result in reduced reliability. If they maintain warranty coverage then effectively customers without tunes are paying extra money to support customers with tunes. Seems unfair, and hence I'm not a big fan of all this "flash back to stock for the dealer" mentality.
On the other hand, I don't like the idea of manufactures taking tunes as a blank check to void the warranty, which is sometimes how manufactures take it. Something like Dinan's approach seems a sensible middle ground, if that could be made universal.
__________________
1M, GT4, 1969 Porsche 911 w/ 997 GT3 Cup Motor (435hp & 2,100 lbs)
|
Appreciate
0
|
03-28-2012, 01:51 AM | #6 |
Private First Class
10
Rep 183
Posts |
I get where they're coming from, but a short shifter voiding warranty?!
I guess its kind of a mute point since Audi's phasing out manuals anyways. But that really sucks, I've come close to adding an Audi to my garage a few times over the years. When you're adding massive amounts of power to your vehicle, I get why they'd void your warranty, but upgrading components like clutch, air intake, intercooler, exhaust? Really? |
Appreciate
0
|
03-28-2012, 03:15 AM | #9 |
Enlisted Member
4
Rep 33
Posts |
Well modding isn't the only way to throw your Audi warranty through the window, track use is another. This is true even for the R8 and their RS branded models. Which is hilarious since catalogs for these models convey the message that the car was designed to be tracked (loads of photos of red/white curbs, start-stop lines, car standing in the pitlane, you get the picture.) But this seems to be a make-specific policy since the guys over at my Porsche stealership confirmed that Porsches can be driven on closed tracks (well otherwise all those GTx models wouldn't make much sense anyhow.)
Not sure how this is handled by BMW M. Anyone knows? (Disclaimer -- this is Europe; maybe things are different in the US.) |
Appreciate
0
|
03-28-2012, 09:41 AM | #10 |
Colonel
180
Rep 2,051
Posts |
Remember there is a precedent for this already. (Law suite already setting the tone) They can say putting a sticker on you car but by law it is on the burden of the manufacture to prove the change damaged the car. This is US only.
Caveat to this is as follow. 1. Dealers are not like the old days when they knew your name and if you changed anything they were like WOW. 2. Dealers want your $$ and nothing else (for the most part) 3. You might have the law on your side BUT how much time and energy will it take for you to prove your rights? Last note. It really comes down to the dealer to say if the modification caused a the issue or not. If the dealer sees a CIA and says it is not hurting anything which caused a void in warranty. Then that is a good dealer as they know for the most part a CIA will not damage the car. (event the sticker could damage the car though =P ) Sad part is that dealer makes up 1% of them out there (wild guess - maybe 5%) |
Appreciate
0
|
03-28-2012, 10:34 AM | #12 |
Major
79
Rep 1,421
Posts |
Audi tried to pull some stupid shenanigans on me 8 years ago. The mass airflow sensor was broken (with no visible issues) and they tried to say my CAI was to blame. I fought them and they finally replaced it under warranty. 6 weeks later I got a letter from Audi saying I had a recall on my mass airflow sensor. Needless to say, the service manager didn't want to talk to me when I saw him the next time. Service departments are always looking to make $$$ and will bend you over at any possible chance. They have deep pockets and gamble on the consumer being able to lawyer up against them. That being said I can understand if a tune prematurely damages an engine but they try to take the issue too far. This is one of those cases IMO.
__________________
Dan Parker
|
Appreciate
0
|
03-28-2012, 10:35 AM | #13 |
Major
168
Rep 1,479
Posts
Drives: 2017 F80 M3
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Houston, TX
|
I kind of understand what you're getting at, but that would mean we would be paying double for a non-Dinan tune. The Dinan warranty is not a BMW warranty and that's why Dinan is so expensive.
__________________
_______________________
1991 E30 M3/Brilliantrot 2017 F80 M3/AW |
Appreciate
0
|
03-28-2012, 11:44 AM | #14 | |
First Lieutenant
20
Rep 325
Posts |
Quote:
IMHO Audi and VAG in general have been fairly aggressive about denying claims when they suspect modification. Seems fair to me, if you modify you should expect to pay for repairs and consider yourself lucky if you do not. |
|
Appreciate
0
|
03-28-2012, 11:50 AM | #15 | |
Major
79
Rep 1,421
Posts |
Quote:
Someone I know at Audi told me they wanted to get away from turbo charging cars due to the amount of warranty/tuner issues. This was around 2004 I believe. They started to do this to some extent but then when mpg and emissions came front and center a few years later they had no choice but to resort to forced induction to be competitive and compliant with the green initiatives. Back then no one would have imagined BMW going the turbo route and even they did. Now that the M division is all turbo (well, soon) there's no looking back. I'm calling KERS by 2015 in M cars.
__________________
Dan Parker
|
|
Appreciate
0
|
03-28-2012, 12:39 PM | #16 | |
First Lieutenant
20
Rep 325
Posts |
Quote:
That decision to go away from turbo charged performance, add stupid LED patterns to their headlights and the tenancy of their interiors to fall apart after 60k miles lost me as a customer. |
|
Appreciate
0
|
03-28-2012, 12:53 PM | #17 |
Brigadier General
275
Rep 3,164
Posts
Drives: Many
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: North of 7K RPM
iTrader: (1)
Garage List 2020 BMW M2 CS [0.00]
1994 Audi RS2 Avant [0.00] 2021 Audi RS6 Avant [0.00] 1988 BMW E30 M3 [0.00] 2011 BMW 1///M [0.00] 2017 BMW F80 M3 30 ... [0.00] 2018 Porsche 991.2 GT3 [0.00] 2015 Porsche Macan ... [0.00] 1998 Porsche 993 C4S [0.00] 1994 Lancia Delta I ... [0.00] 2008 Audi RS4 [0.00] |
I agree that marking a car as TD1 based on say a short shifter is going way overboard. I guess then owner can throw the MM Act at the manufacturer (assuming component for which warranty is sought is unrelated/unaffected by the SSK), but still, you have a legal process ahead of you.
One of the biggest issues I see here is that this goes above and beyond the dealer's call, basically it is out of his hands even if he were willing to help you out. As car is hooked up to the diagnostic equipment, it will throw a TD1 code if it detects a tune. This flags the car in the system, so he bares a huge risk if he were to 'close his eyes' and perform warranty service. There are still 'mod-friendly' dealers out there that have been very accommodating to owners of modified cars, but in this case any power they may have had to do warranty work in-house on a moved car without being scrutinized by the parent company is now gone... PS: All this is to the benefit of a company called STaSIS, which you can think of the equivalent of Dinan for Audis. A lot of the Audi dealers are Stasis dealers, so you have the ability to get aftermarket products installed at the dealer and still have full warranty coverage. While the products are branded as STaSIS, they are often 3rd party developed products per STaSIS specs (e.g. Ohlins for their suspensions, Alcons for their brake systems). And STaSIS just bought Revo, so now they are big in both the hardware and software arena. http://www.stasisengineering.com/
__________________
2011 BMW E82 1///M: AW, all options; Renntech, Akrapovic, Forge, P3, RevoZ CF bits, many mods
1988 BMW E30 M3: Hennarot, S14, stock 2018 Porsche 991.2 GT3: PtS, CXX, LWBS, PCCB 1998 Porsche 993 C4S: Zenith Blue, last aircooled widebody, Bilstein PSS10, Fister II + Fabspeed exhaust 2008 Audi B7 RS 4: Sprint Blue, Audi Exclusive Euro Bucket Interior, Premium+Titanium, many mods |
Appreciate
0
|
03-28-2012, 01:14 PM | #18 |
Major
111
Rep 1,338
Posts |
totally fair. if they had to replace all the blown turbos caused by various aftermarket b5s4 tunes back then, they'd still be recovering the costs in 2013 MSRP hikes.
|
Appreciate
0
|
03-28-2012, 01:22 PM | #19 | |
First Lieutenant
20
Rep 325
Posts |
Quote:
I enjoyed my B5 S4, but I'm very happy i got rid of it at 75K miles. |
|
Appreciate
0
|
03-28-2012, 01:27 PM | #20 |
Captain
22
Rep 908
Posts |
I disagree based on the verbiage in the document. If Audi says that they can detect aftermarket tunes then they should check whenever they suspect that tuning may have contributed to a warranty claim but to void the entire drivetrain warranty is, IMO excessive. Take for example a CAI, according to the document above, installing an intake or replacement filter with no other mods would relieve Audi of any liability if your transmission failed even though an intake would have no effect on the tranny.
__________________
Vorsprung durch Gas Geben!! 172 of 740 |
Appreciate
0
|
03-28-2012, 01:29 PM | #21 |
Captain
22
Rep 908
Posts |
On the other hand, if you take your Audi in with a blown turbo and Audi detects an ECU tune, then they're fully within their rights to deny a warranty claim already, without the need for any additional tracking/warranty codes. And I agree that they SHOULD.
__________________
Vorsprung durch Gas Geben!! 172 of 740 |
Appreciate
0
|
Post Reply |
Bookmarks |
|
|