BMW 1 Series Coupe Forum / 1 Series Convertible Forum (1M / tii / 135i / 128i / Coupe / Cabrio / Hatchback) (BMW E82 E88 128i 130i 135i)
 





 

Post Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
      05-19-2014, 07:37 AM   #45
skyscraper_g80
First Lieutenant
skyscraper_g80's Avatar
Australia
371
Rep
339
Posts

Drives: 2022 G80 M3 Competition xDrive
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Sydney

iTrader: (0)

Garage List
Quote:
Originally Posted by _Ryan_ View Post
E92 is too big. My current car is already too big. I live on a mountain down a goat track off of a lane way.

N54 is cost effective power. S65 is power. N52 is best left standard, so far- this has potential to change that.

Flinchy and I share a viewpoint on this one.

* Still waiting to hear back from ESS *
+1. Keep us updated Ryan
Appreciate 0
      05-19-2014, 08:14 AM   #46
InControl
Lieutenant
InControl's Avatar
59
Rep
552
Posts

Drives: '13 328i coupe
Join Date: Sep 2013
Location: VA

iTrader: (0)

Quote:
Originally Posted by flinchy View Post
Not so much

There will be less losses from inertia in the lightweight components

The weight of parts has nothing to do with how much boost the blower needs to make more power.. Or how much boost the blower makes, that's purely how fast it's spinning.. Belt driven and all.
I agree with everything you said, my comment is geared to the friction going on in the cylinder heads and around, when the parts are lighter and say 8 psi boost is generated for an M54 and N52, the lighter N52 should have natural weight advantage with the same boost when compared to M54, should be more effective, generating higher hp with less friction with the same boost. Now this would be the advantage of boosting N52 over M54. N52's lighter elements should also be seen as a benefit for boosting (in some ways) and not always a downside, as is almost always the case here (forums land).
Appreciate 0
      05-19-2014, 09:28 AM   #47
tuphdc
Second Lieutenant
20
Rep
212
Posts

Drives: 09 BMW 128i 6MT Sport Pkg
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: King of Prussia, PA

iTrader: (0)

Is there any point in upgrading the DISA manifold if you do the SC upgrade?
Appreciate 0
      05-19-2014, 09:57 AM   #48
cmcdonald
Second Lieutenant
cmcdonald's Avatar
United_States
8
Rep
216
Posts

Drives: 2012 BMW 128i
Join Date: Dec 2013
Location: Chicago, IL

iTrader: (0)

Quote:
Originally Posted by InControl View Post
I agree with everything you said, my comment is geared to the friction going on in the cylinder heads and around, when the parts are lighter and say 8 psi boost is generated for an M54 and N52, the lighter N52 should have natural weight advantage with the same boost when compared to M54, should be more effective, generating higher hp with less friction with the same boost. Now this would be the advantage of boosting N52 over M54. N52's lighter elements should also be seen as a benefit for boosting (in some ways) and not always a downside, as is almost always the case here (forums land).
Lightweight components are good for efficiency and good to make a quick revving engine, but they are bad for boost. Lightweight comes at the penalty of reducing strength. With boost strength is what is important so you don't throw a rod through a block. With boost you are increasing the cylinder pressure by forcing more are and also more fuel in the cylinder. You need strong not light weight components to handle the pressure.
Appreciate 0
      05-19-2014, 09:59 AM   #49
Iron Man
Major
Iron Man's Avatar
United_States
189
Rep
1,026
Posts

Drives: N/A
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: NC

iTrader: (0)

Quote:
Originally Posted by cmcdonald View Post
You need strong not light weight components to handle the pressure.
These two are not necessarily mutually exclusive. Usually depends on how much you want to spend.
Appreciate 0
      05-19-2014, 10:53 AM   #50
InControl
Lieutenant
InControl's Avatar
59
Rep
552
Posts

Drives: '13 328i coupe
Join Date: Sep 2013
Location: VA

iTrader: (0)

I hope that N52 proves to be solid enough to boost. According to ESSTUNING it is. That being the case, time will prove the success of the N52 and ESS blower. I have a feeling it's gonna be great in part because of lightweight
Appreciate 1
      05-19-2014, 06:23 PM   #51
flinchy
Brigadier General
126
Rep
3,099
Posts

Drives: E82 135i
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: QLD, Australia

iTrader: (0)

Quote:
Originally Posted by InControl View Post
I agree with everything you said, my comment is geared to the friction going on in the cylinder heads and around, when the parts are lighter and say 8 psi boost is generated for an M54 and N52, the lighter N52 should have natural weight advantage with the same boost when compared to M54, should be more effective, generating higher hp with less friction with the same boost. Now this would be the advantage of boosting N52 over M54. N52's lighter elements should also be seen as a benefit for boosting (in some ways) and not always a downside, as is almost always the case here (forums land).
yeah, there will be less frictional/inertial losses in general

it's a fairly efficient motor, and adding boost only works with the efficiency...

not so much to do with the mass, but the overall design of the motor.. high volumetric efficiency, high compression, all that nice stuff. 1lb of boost on a given blower on the N52 will make more power than 1lb of boost on the M54, yes, you're correct.

i wouldn't expect the N52 to break before 400whp even... the N54 with the same PISTONS has seen 750 so far, and 650 ft-lb... to make 400whp, the N52 only needs 300 ft-lb at redline.

anyone who thinks 300 ft-lb will break the N52 is in la-la land.

cast iron crank, oil cooled hypereutetic alu pistons, alusil cylinder liners, tapered rods.. block is alu-mg.. absolutely nothing in the N52 is 'weak'
Appreciate 0
      05-19-2014, 10:29 PM   #52
InControl
Lieutenant
InControl's Avatar
59
Rep
552
Posts

Drives: '13 328i coupe
Join Date: Sep 2013
Location: VA

iTrader: (0)

Quote:
Originally Posted by flinchy View Post
yeah, there will be less frictional/inertial losses in general

it's a fairly efficient motor, and adding boost only works with the efficiency...

not so much to do with the mass, but the overall design of the motor.. high volumetric efficiency, high compression, all that nice stuff. 1lb of boost on a given blower on the N52 will make more power than 1lb of boost on the M54, yes, you're correct.

i wouldn't expect the N52 to break before 400whp even... the N54 with the same PISTONS has seen 750 so far, and 650 ft-lb... to make 400whp, the N52 only needs 300 ft-lb at redline.

anyone who thinks 300 ft-lb will break the N52 is in la-la land.

cast iron crank, oil cooled hypereutetic alu pistons, alusil cylinder liners, tapered rods.. block is alu-mg.. absolutely nothing in the N52 is 'weak'

Efficiency is good engineering resulting in mass reduction.
Once this SC is proven to work well on the N52 it's likely to spam a couple higher boosted blowers with an inter cooler
Appreciate 0
      05-20-2014, 07:07 AM   #53
flinchy
Brigadier General
126
Rep
3,099
Posts

Drives: E82 135i
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: QLD, Australia

iTrader: (0)

Quote:
Originally Posted by InControl View Post
Efficiency is good engineering resulting in mass reduction.
Once this SC is proven to work well on the N52 it's likely to spam a couple higher boosted blowers with an inter cooler
yeah given this is stage 1, i'd assume no intercooler, no oil cooler, maybe even 91 tune instead of 93

it should be SUPER easy to get a load more power out of it.. better fuel, intercooler, more timing.
Appreciate 0
      05-20-2014, 10:47 AM   #54
kobeballer96
Major
kobeballer96's Avatar
United_States
175
Rep
1,491
Posts

Drives: 6SPD E82
Join Date: May 2013
Location: North Carolina

iTrader: (4)

Quote from my email from Roman at ESS tuning.


"The kit will come with everything you need including software.
We will not release production dyno numbers until the kit is 100% finished.
This kit does not run FMIC as it is a low boost application.
All of our kits get a min of 30k miles of testing and are reliable.
DISA manifolds I will follow up on with you."
__________________
Black Wrapped Roof, BFG Rivals, Dinan Camber plates, M3 Steering wheel, Matte Black kidney Grills, H&R Sport springs,
Sparco assetto gara,Pagid sport Brakepads,STOPTECH Slotted Rotors,
DISA STG3,EURO BOX
Appreciate 0
      05-20-2014, 10:55 AM   #55
TheSt|G
Resident Tamed Racing Driver
TheSt|G's Avatar
United_States
298
Rep
4,697
Posts

Drives: 911, 130is, E39 M5, E36 M3
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Outside Philly

iTrader: (2)

Quote:
Originally Posted by kobeballer96 View Post
Quote from my email from Roman at ESS tuning.


"The kit will come with everything you need including software.
We will not release production dyno numbers until the kit is 100% finished.
This kit does not run FMIC as it is a low boost application.
All of our kits get a min of 30k miles of testing and are reliable.
DISA manifolds I will follow up on with you."
I definitely would add in a oil/coolant temp gauge or buy a V1/2 electronic steering wheel if I was someone purchasing this kit. Adding boost without temp monitoring with no additional oil/coolant cooling is just asking for trouble.
__________________
2005 E46 M3 Interlagos/Cinnamon with Sunroof Delete
Appreciate 0
      05-20-2014, 11:58 AM   #56
tuphdc
Second Lieutenant
20
Rep
212
Posts

Drives: 09 BMW 128i 6MT Sport Pkg
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: King of Prussia, PA

iTrader: (0)

Quote:
Originally Posted by TheSt|G View Post
I definitely would add in a oil/coolant temp gauge or buy a V1/2 electronic steering wheel if I was someone purchasing this kit. Adding boost without temp monitoring with no additional oil/coolant cooling is just asking for trouble.

why is the electronic steering wheel necessary? Also, how I do know what steering wheel I have (128i sport pkg)?
Appreciate 0
      05-20-2014, 12:02 PM   #57
TheSt|G
Resident Tamed Racing Driver
TheSt|G's Avatar
United_States
298
Rep
4,697
Posts

Drives: 911, 130is, E39 M5, E36 M3
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Outside Philly

iTrader: (2)

Quote:
Originally Posted by tuphdc View Post
why is the electronic steering wheel necessary? Also, how I do know what steering wheel I have (128i sport pkg)?
It has oil/coolant temp gauges built into it. I was just giving a couple options for monitoring the supercharger.

I assume you have the sport package wheel...
__________________
2005 E46 M3 Interlagos/Cinnamon with Sunroof Delete
Appreciate 0
      05-20-2014, 12:33 PM   #58
kobeballer96
Major
kobeballer96's Avatar
United_States
175
Rep
1,491
Posts

Drives: 6SPD E82
Join Date: May 2013
Location: North Carolina

iTrader: (4)

Quote:
Originally Posted by TheSt|G View Post
I definitely would add in a oil/coolant temp gauge or buy a V1/2 electronic steering wheel if I was someone purchasing this kit. Adding boost without temp monitoring with no additional oil/coolant cooling is just asking for trouble.
that's a given and a easy fix lol. no need to spend thousands for a steering wheel with a guage lol
Appreciate 0
      05-20-2014, 12:39 PM   #59
Freon
Major
United_States
81
Rep
1,051
Posts

Drives: 2009 135i
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Indianapolis

iTrader: (3)

I guess I see the uniqueness factor, but otherwise this looks like a bad idea. Trading over to a -35i of the same model year and mileage isn't really that expensive, plus you also get the upgraded brake package among possibly other things (US gets moonroof standard on the 135i over a 128i, etc.) Cost, performance/cost ratio, unknown vs known reliability, depreciation of the investment, poor low-end from a centrifugal blower, efficiency of belt-driven superchargers (lots of bypass air on part throttle, pumping losses), availability of more aftermarket parts and proven bolt-on gains, etc.

I'd at least take a real hard look at trading up before buying it.
__________________
2009 BMW 135i 6MT Sport, AFE intake, Cobb AP, Apex 18x8.5+9.5, 255/275 PSS
Appreciate 0
      05-20-2014, 12:45 PM   #60
TheSt|G
Resident Tamed Racing Driver
TheSt|G's Avatar
United_States
298
Rep
4,697
Posts

Drives: 911, 130is, E39 M5, E36 M3
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Outside Philly

iTrader: (2)

Quote:
Originally Posted by kobeballer96 View Post
that's a given and a easy fix lol. no need to spend thousands for a steering wheel with a guage lol
That's why I suggested either option...

Wheel is hardly "thousands" either, and has a good deal more functionality than a single gauge. Plus it seamlessly matches the rest of the interior.
__________________
2005 E46 M3 Interlagos/Cinnamon with Sunroof Delete
Appreciate 0
      05-20-2014, 06:29 PM   #61
631twentyeighteye
Colonel
631twentyeighteye's Avatar
United_States
198
Rep
2,239
Posts

Drives: 08 335i
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Long island

iTrader: (7)

Quote:
Originally Posted by Freon View Post
I guess I see the uniqueness factor, but otherwise this looks like a bad idea. Trading over to a -35i of the same model year and mileage isn't really that expensive, plus you also get the upgraded brake package among possibly other things (US gets moonroof standard on the 135i over a 128i, etc.) Cost, performance/cost ratio, unknown vs known reliability, depreciation of the investment, poor low-end from a centrifugal blower, efficiency of belt-driven superchargers (lots of bypass air on part throttle, pumping losses), availability of more aftermarket parts and proven bolt-on gains, etc.

I'd at least take a real hard look at trading up before buying it.
while i don't disagree that it would be financially smarter, some of us would prefer a supercharged 128 because it's lighter and the n52 with a supercharger would keep the NA power delivery. The main downside of the n54 is that it's 200 pounds heavier than the n52 and IMO the 1 series already weighs too much.
__________________
08 e93 335i MT
Appreciate 0
      05-20-2014, 08:12 PM   #62
FactorX81
First Lieutenant
United_States
29
Rep
363
Posts

Drives: 2010 135i, 2014 Ford Escape Ti
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: NJ

iTrader: (0)

Quote:
Originally Posted by 631twentyeighteye View Post
while i don't disagree that it would be financially smarter, some of us would prefer a supercharged 128 because it's lighter and the n52 with a supercharger would keep the NA power delivery. The main downside of the n54 is that it's 200 pounds heavier than the n52 and IMO the 1 series already weighs too much.
How does the n54 weigh 200lbs more? I thought the whole car weighed more not just the engine. Moonroof, HIDs brakes etc. I was looking and can't find this info do you have a source.
Appreciate 0
      05-20-2014, 08:21 PM   #63
631twentyeighteye
Colonel
631twentyeighteye's Avatar
United_States
198
Rep
2,239
Posts

Drives: 08 335i
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Long island

iTrader: (7)

I have a moonroof and my car is claimed to weigh 3227 or something like that, I don't recall exactly what it was. I mean i don't think the n54 alone is all the weight, but the beefed up transmission, bigger differential, beefier CV axles(assumed, I haven't confirmed this) etc all add weight. It's a fact that the n54 is made of heavier grade material in order to withstand boost pressures. There's a reason a stock block n54 can reach 700+hp with some new turbo's and FBO. I don't hate the n54 by any means, it's an epic engine from a tuning standpoint.

I wish i didn't have the sunroof/moonroof since it adds a ton of weight really high on the car. I mean it's lovely since my car is mostly a DD but from a performance standpoint sun/moonroofs are a negative.

FWIW another member that weighed his car for autox reasons came out to under 3200lbs. I think it was 3137 but again i can't remember the specifics. He has no moonroof/unnecessary gadgets or options and i believe Apex wheels that weighed a ton less than the stock wheels and tires.
__________________
08 e93 335i MT
Appreciate 0
      05-20-2014, 08:54 PM   #64
FactorX81
First Lieutenant
United_States
29
Rep
363
Posts

Drives: 2010 135i, 2014 Ford Escape Ti
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: NJ

iTrader: (0)

Yeah looks like the n54 weighs about 75lb more and Edmunds lists the 135 as 120lb more so I think most of the other stuff might not weigh that much. While I would love to feel how one of these engines feels supercharged I'm not sure there would be much weight savings once the blower is added. I'm looking forward to the dynos.
Appreciate 0
      05-21-2014, 06:28 AM   #65
TheSt|G
Resident Tamed Racing Driver
TheSt|G's Avatar
United_States
298
Rep
4,697
Posts

Drives: 911, 130is, E39 M5, E36 M3
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Outside Philly

iTrader: (2)

The weight difference is +/-200lbs, depending on options. Engine weight doesn't factor in the aforementioned beefed up components and other items like oil coolers and such.
Appreciate 0
      05-21-2014, 10:31 AM   #66
Freon
Major
United_States
81
Rep
1,051
Posts

Drives: 2009 135i
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Indianapolis

iTrader: (3)

That kit, especially after you add an intercooler (scary that it doesn't come with one, IMO, and will really limit how much power/boost you can add), will add a fair amount of weight, all in the front overhang. You may need to start adding other stuff like an uprated clutch, oil cooler, etc. to handle the power, too.

75lbs just for the engine N52 vs. N54 (including turbo, extra piping, intercooler, etc) seems reasonable. The rest is probably brakes, moonroof, probably a few minor things I'm forgetting. Factory oil cooler, perhaps radiator or fans are slightly larger?

I think the brakes are well worth it, especially with the added power.
__________________
2009 BMW 135i 6MT Sport, AFE intake, Cobb AP, Apex 18x8.5+9.5, 255/275 PSS
Appreciate 0
Post Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:34 PM.




1addicts
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
1Addicts.com, BIMMERPOST.com, E90Post.com, F30Post.com, M3Post.com, ZPost.com, 5Post.com, 6Post.com, 7Post.com, XBimmers.com logo and trademark are properties of BIMMERPOST