N54 & N55 Single Turbo Project

[Brule]

That looks good.

[martymil]

You interested brule ?

[Brule]

Nah but I think it would be really good.

[martymil]

It's beyond good, it's the last ic you have to buy

[martymil]

Well here is the wagner evo comp 2 doing its thing today

Starts of at 312rwk and quickly drops with each subsequent run

Had to shut it down on the third run as the temps where a little to high

http://www.datazap.me/u/martymil/log...g=0&data=1-4-6

[JB4-335]

Originally Posted by martymil

Well here is the wagner evo comp 2 doing its thing today

Starts of at 312rwk and quickly drops with each subsequent run

Had to shut it down on the third run as the temps where a little to high

http://www.datazap.me/u/martymil/log...g=0&data=1-4-6

Something is clearly not right with that dyno graph if your losing 39wkw after a few runs.

Never seen that happen even with OEM IC.

[JD75]

Originally Posted by JB4-335

Something is clearly not right with that dyno graph if your losing 39wkw after a few runs.

Never seen that happen even with OEM IC.

Timing targets have been subsequently reduced more and more due to increasing IAT's.

[drjekl]

Originally Posted by martymil

Well here is the wagner evo comp 2 doing its thing today

Starts of at 312rwk and quickly drops with each subsequent run

Had to shut it down on the third run as the temps where a little to high

http://www.datazap.me/u/martymil/log...g=0&data=1-4-6

Is this one of those aliexpress wagner FMIC's

[JB4-335]

Originally Posted by JD75

Timing targets have been subsequently reduced more and more due to increasing IAT's.

I get that but that IAT increase just doesn't look normal for any upgraded IC let alone a Wagner Evo comp 2.

Originally Posted by drjekl

Is this one of those aliexpress wagner FMIC's

Maybe

[135i2]

I take it you own a Wagner, so the results cant possibly be right, right!

[titium]

Originally Posted by 135i2

I take it you own a Wagner, so the results cant possibly be right, right!

Almost certain he has an AMS intercooler.

but damn the wagner is disappointing 80C IAT

Reviewed my logs and highest temp I saw on track with a evo 1 performance was 60C :

[martymil]

On the track the wagner performs well as there is lots of airflow but put it in a low air flow situation and it heat soaked quickly just like any other stepped IC

Well i was shocked how well jd75 new core works and on one of his customers cars the thing could not be heat soaked run after run after run

I'll test it next week when I fit it over the weekend and I'll carry out the same test.

The wagner is a great street and light track IC no doubt and suits most people

[rac]

Originally Posted by martymil

On the track the wagner performs well as there is lots of airflow but put it in a low air flow situation and it heat soaked quickly just like any other stepped IC

Well i was shocked how well jd75 new core works and on one of his customers cars the thing could not be heat soaked run after run after run

I'll test it next week when I fit it over the weekend and I'll carry out the same test.

The wagner is a great street and light track IC no doubt and suits most people

I'd be interested in this IC if someone can vouch for its on track performance. Wouldn't mind dropping 6kg or so off my vrsf.

[martymil]

The owner of this car I'm talking about does a lot of roll racing he is going to the next roll racing event and he is going to provide some logs

He done a few third gear pulls the other day and the temps didn't exceed a 100f

The last rollracing event I entered my temps where off the chart

[vtl]

Why is everyone who is involved with this intercooler using Fahrenheit ?

Worse is when you use ambient temps in C and then quote a temp rise in F

[martymil]

Because the software reads in Fahrenheit

That's JB4 software

Edit wrong formula

[JB4-335]

Originally Posted by martymil

Because the software reads in Fahrenheit

That's JB4 software

Just devide f temp by 2.86 and it will give you c

Incorrect again.

[titium]

Originally Posted by martymil

Just devide f temp by 2.86 and it will give you c

not sure where 2.86 comes from but the correct method to go from f to c is:

Deduct 32, then multiply by 5, then divide by 9

[Brule]

I talk in Fahrenheit because of all the US guys.
Well I did back in the day.

I'm so used to f I wouldn't know if my cars hot or cold using Celsius.

Maybe I should change and the keep Aus data together.

[Brule]

When are you getting some street logs Marty?

[martymil]

Yes got mixed up it's f -32 /1.8

[martymil]

Originally Posted by JB4-335

Incorrect again.

I don't use this software it tends to crash and not work half the time

Use a proper laptop or tablet and JB4 software far more accurate