BMW 1 Series Coupe Forum / 1 Series Convertible Forum (1M / tii / 135i / 128i / Coupe / Cabrio / Hatchback) (BMW E82 E88 128i 130i 135i)
 





 

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
      12-21-2007, 09:58 AM   #111
chemhalo
Private
2
Rep
98
Posts

Drives:
Join Date: Jul 2007

iTrader: (0)

Quote:
Originally Posted by Evolved View Post
It cost me $400 to have my Evo dyno tuned by a professional and I'll take a custom tune over a mail in flash any day.
My buddy in college did the same with his Evo VIII-sweet car. In the VW/Audi area no such thing exists though. It gets talked about every once in a while and everyone wishes they could do it but we are stuck with packaged flashes. Beyond that you can made little tweaks, but nothing major. Im guessing that the motronic ECU is just pain in the ass complicated so the "freeware" software like in the Subie crowd just isnt possible. The BMW ECU might turn out to be exactly the same way as the VW/Audi.
Appreciate 0
      12-21-2007, 10:05 AM   #112
Evolved
Bad Lieutenant
No_Country
6
Rep
465
Posts

Drives: Evo
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: PA

iTrader: (0)

Quote:
Originally Posted by chemhalo View Post
My buddy in college did the same with his Evo VIII-sweet car. In the VW/Audi area no such thing exists though. It gets talked about every once in a while and everyone wishes they could do it but we are stuck with packaged flashes. Beyond that you can made little tweaks, but nothing major. Im guessing that the motronic ECU is just pain in the ass complicated so the "freeware" software like in the Subie crowd just isnt possible. The BMW ECU might turn out to be exactly the same way as the VW/Audi.
I have a 20th now and before that I had a "regular" '03 GTi with a full APR reflash.
Appreciate 0
      12-21-2007, 10:12 PM   #113
~AJ
Private First Class
3
Rep
184
Posts

Drives: None
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: OC

iTrader: (0)

Quote:
Originally Posted by Evolved View Post
And about the price, It cost me $400 to have my Evo dyno tuned by a professional and I'll take a custom tune over a mail in flash any day.
True words, both for the price and the custom vs. mail in flash.

$2,000 for the Dinan reflash is too much money.
Appreciate 0
      12-21-2007, 11:34 PM   #114
TunedM2C
Brigadier General
TunedM2C's Avatar
No_Country
829
Rep
4,190
Posts

Drives: 2016 LBB M2
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Earth

iTrader: (2)

Quote:
Originally Posted by Evolved View Post
I have a 20th now and before that I had a "regular" '03 GTi with a full APR reflash.
My wife drives an '05 GLI w/DSG (love that dual clutch system) and I thought about reflashing her car. Problem is, she drives it so slow I don't even think the turbo's get a chance to spool up.
Appreciate 0
      12-22-2007, 10:22 AM   #115
Evolved
Bad Lieutenant
No_Country
6
Rep
465
Posts

Drives: Evo
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: PA

iTrader: (0)

Quote:
Originally Posted by Tuned1 View Post
My wife drives an '05 GLI w/DSG (love that dual clutch system) and I thought about reflashing her car. Problem is, she drives it so slow I don't even think the turbo's get a chance to spool up.
Appreciate 0
      12-22-2007, 09:56 PM   #116
Garrett
Banned
23
Rep
1,356
Posts

Drives: 2004 330ci
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Mich

iTrader: (0)

Quote:
Originally Posted by AJ~ View Post
True words, both for the price and the custom vs. mail in flash.

$2,000 for the Dinan reflash is too much money.


Why?
Appreciate 0
      12-22-2007, 10:05 PM   #117
Garrett
Banned
23
Rep
1,356
Posts

Drives: 2004 330ci
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Mich

iTrader: (0)

Quote:
Originally Posted by chemhalo View Post
My buddy in college did the same with his Evo VIII-sweet car. In the VW/Audi area no such thing exists though. It gets talked about every once in a while and everyone wishes they could do it but we are stuck with packaged flashes. Beyond that you can made little tweaks, but nothing major. Im guessing that the motronic ECU is just pain in the ass complicated so the "freeware" software like in the Subie crowd just isnt possible. The BMW ECU might turn out to be exactly the same way as the VW/Audi.


BMW's ECU's are ENCRYPTED... Jim Conforti broke the 8bit encryption on the older e46's and was able to control VANOS and other "tuneable" aspect of the ngine. BMW didn't like that.. So since then they have gone to 32bit encryption.

Pretty much uncrackable.... So for someone to "flash" a BMW's engine, they must have a license from them.

I am sure Hartge, DINAN and Turner all work very closely with BMW and their "tunes" are sanctioned by BMW, less they would'nt issue the license to them. That doesn't mean BMW warranties it, just that they are not hurting the engine and have considerable bench time.

All other tunes are piggybacks..

$600 bucks more for a flash seems like a pretty good deal. But then-again... that depends on your situation or need.








-Garrett
Appreciate 0
      12-22-2007, 10:13 PM   #118
Garrett
Banned
23
Rep
1,356
Posts

Drives: 2004 330ci
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Mich

iTrader: (0)

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jeff_DML View Post
my guess is there is not more lag, just feels that way because there is more boost. So the differen between no/partitial/full boost is more noticeable.

+10
:headbang:

At 1400rpm's the turbos are spooling at a given rate.. due to the rate of exhaust.

Unless a "tune" adjust the consumtion of fual/air CONSIDERABLY at such low rpm's... then there will be hardly anything noticeable at such low rpms.

I suspect that the huge torque gains of the procede whip you back in your seat onec you at full boost... so the transition from no boost to full is greater. Thus it feels like more lag when your still on the NA part of the N54.
Appreciate 0
      12-23-2007, 09:15 AM   #119
MrRoboto
Brigadier General
Canada
1846
Rep
4,836
Posts

Drives: VO 1M
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Canada

iTrader: (0)

Quote:
Originally Posted by MrRoboto View Post
There wouldn’t be more lag.

Their would be more 'perceivable' lag as it relates to peak power. The exhaust gasses are flowing at the same rate causing the blower to spool at the same rate it just takes longer to reach max boost.


:thumbup:
Appreciate 0
      12-23-2007, 09:22 AM   #120
larryn
Lieutenant General
United_States
2148
Rep
10,176
Posts

Drives: '97 332ti, '21 X5 45e, '16 GT4
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Seattle

iTrader: (2)

Whatever you want to call it, so be it. All I can say is that there was a lag in time (if you not want to call it turbo lag, that's fine), after stomping on the gas of both procede equipped cars that wasn't there on unmodded 335i cars. Accelleration was more instant on the non-modded cars, but stronger on the procede cars (when it came).

Remember, on an autocross course, you are constantly on and off the gas, pretty hard. It was very obvious that "one of these things is not like the other one". :iono:
Appreciate 0
      12-23-2007, 11:16 AM   #121
chemhalo
Private
2
Rep
98
Posts

Drives:
Join Date: Jul 2007

iTrader: (0)

Quote:
Originally Posted by Garrett View Post
$600 bucks more for a flash seems like a pretty good deal. But then-again... that depends on your situation or need.
Im still gonna wait for GIAC on this one. Regardless of situation/need, $2000 for an ECU flash is not consistent with other cars/tuners in this range. For example, 996TT programming from GIAC is $1000. S4 programming is only $600. The N54 engine will probably provide a reasonably large market with the 135, 335, 535, maybe even a N54 Z4, X3.. etc.

Im guessing base price from GIAC would be $600 with add ons of Stock, Valet for $50-100 each, a race gas program for $200 more, and the flashloader program switcher for $150. So, you could get away with as little damage as $600 or as much as $1150. Still alot less than even some of the piggybacks. If what i speculate is even close to true... screw Dinan :smile:
Appreciate 0
      12-23-2007, 11:30 AM   #122
Jeff_DML
Lieutenant
United_States
24
Rep
472
Posts

Drives: 01 996TT
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: San Diego

iTrader: (0)

Quote:
Originally Posted by chemhalo View Post
Im still gonna wait for GIAC on this one. Regardless of situation/need, $2000 for an ECU flash is not consistent with other cars/tuners in this range. For example, 996TT programming from GIAC is $1000. S4 programming is only $600. The N54 engine will probably provide a reasonably large market with the 135, 335, 535, maybe even a N54 Z4, X3.. etc.

Im guessing base price from GIAC would be $600 with add ons of Stock, Valet for $50-100 each, a race gas program for $200 more, and the flashloader program switcher for $150. So, you could get away with as little damage as $600 or as much as $1150. Still alot less than even some of the piggybacks. If what i speculate is even close to true... screw Dinan :smile:
do you know if GIAC is working on the 335? that would be nice,

I like cobb sw I have in my WRX.

Also had APR and Neuspeed sw in my 1.8T a4, had some pinging problems with APR but I will give them some slack since I run 91 CA piss gas and they fixed it with a new map.
Appreciate 0
      12-23-2007, 12:51 PM   #123
chemhalo
Private
2
Rep
98
Posts

Drives:
Join Date: Jul 2007

iTrader: (0)

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jeff_DML View Post
do you know if GIAC is working on the 335? that would be nice
Yes, they are.. or at least were... last i heard they were having major issues cracking the ECU. They are/were also working in conjunction with VF Engineering on a turbo kit.
Appreciate 0
      12-23-2007, 01:06 PM   #124
Garrett
Banned
23
Rep
1,356
Posts

Drives: 2004 330ci
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Mich

iTrader: (0)

Quote:
Originally Posted by chemhalo View Post
Yes, they are.. or at least were... last i heard they were having major issues cracking the ECU. They are/were also working in conjunction with VF Engineering on a turbo kit.


Exactly, they arn't even working on a tune right now... their still trying to crack the encryption on it. While Dinan payed the licensing fee and have already spent 6 months with refinning their n54 "tune".

PROcede is the next best thing at $600 cheaper.
Appreciate 0
      12-23-2007, 03:51 PM   #125
~AJ
Private First Class
3
Rep
184
Posts

Drives: None
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: OC

iTrader: (0)

Quote:
Originally Posted by Garrett View Post
Why?
Reference the post to which you ask "why."

1. True words. That means I agree with him.

2. $2,000 is too much for a reflash. That's my opinion.

3. A custom dyno tuned reflash is better than the mail in reflash such as the one on my car. He is right; it is true. Search.


That is why.
Appreciate 0
      12-23-2007, 04:58 PM   #126
Evolved
Bad Lieutenant
No_Country
6
Rep
465
Posts

Drives: Evo
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: PA

iTrader: (0)

Quote:
Originally Posted by AJ~ View Post
Reference the post to which you ask "why."

1. True words. That means I agree with him.

2. $2,000 is too much for a reflash. That's my opinion.

3. A custom dyno tuned reflash is better than the mail in reflash such as the one on my car. He is right; it is true. Search.


That is why.

Yeah, if I was getting a custom map that was designed specifically for my car and the mods I have then I would be willing to pay(not $2k though). But if all they have to offer is an off the shelf, basic, reflash for $2k then forget about it.
Appreciate 0
      12-25-2007, 10:35 AM   #127
Prince ///M
Second Lieutenant
4
Rep
200
Posts

Drives:
Join Date: Dec 2007

iTrader: (0)

About performance tuning, I would like to remember that ALPINA (an official BMW tuner), on the last B3 edition with N54 engine has reached 355bhp and 369lb ft @3800-5000rpm, but on Mahle pistons that lowers compression ratio at 9.4:1 (1.1 bar of boost).

With all the due respect to the "independent" tuners, I think taht nobody knows BMW engines better than BMW itselfs and, if they suggests to Alpina such a replacement in order to mantain reliability, maybe that could be the better option also for the "everyday use" customers.

P.S.
The Alpina B3 is capable of 0-62mph acceleration in 4.9s and a top speed of 180+mph.
Appreciate 0
      12-25-2007, 02:35 PM   #128
Garrett
Banned
23
Rep
1,356
Posts

Drives: 2004 330ci
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Mich

iTrader: (0)

Quote:
Originally Posted by AJ~ View Post
Reference the post to which you ask "why."

1. True words. That means I agree with him.

2. $2,000 is too much for a reflash. That's my opinion.

3. A custom dyno tuned reflash is better than the mail in reflash such as the one on my car. He is right; it is true. Search.


That is why.

Hunh..? (The post in which I ask "why" has your quote in it, thats the reference)

Your assumption are based off fantasy... because it is NOT a valid option. (IE it does not exsist).

You feel $2k is too much for a flash? My question is... (again) WHY? ... do you feel $2k is too much for a flash of the ECU..?

Is it that your personally not interested in it, or; Financially not viable, or; too much trouble, or; etc...?

Why..?

Because the other option you keep talking about is not and will not be available! (Custom tune, custom flash)

So WHY do you feel DINAN's price of $2k is too much..? PROcede is only $1,400 and it's a piggyback. So explain to me your thinking on how $600 is too much? Because logically... thats all we are discussing is the difference in price.






-Garrett
Appreciate 0
      12-25-2007, 03:14 PM   #129
~AJ
Private First Class
3
Rep
184
Posts

Drives: None
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: OC

iTrader: (0)

Garrett,

Why are you acting like this?

I have answered your "why" question already.

I stand by my opinion regarding the cost of the Dinan reflash, and judging by the responses, the opinion is shared by others.

Let it go.

-AJ
Appreciate 0
      12-25-2007, 03:30 PM   #130
BForbes
Moderator
BForbes's Avatar
Bahamas
559
Rep
4,240
Posts

Drives: BSM 135i/AW E90 M3
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Orlando, FL

iTrader: (0)

I agree that the 2k from Dinan is worth it. I respect the R&D that goes into tinkering with expensive BMW software.
__________________
- 04 Honda S2000(gone)
Appreciate 0
      12-25-2007, 03:34 PM   #131
MrRoboto
Brigadier General
Canada
1846
Rep
4,836
Posts

Drives: VO 1M
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Canada

iTrader: (0)

Quote:
Originally Posted by onehots2k View Post
I agree that the 2k from Dinan is worth it. I respect the R&D that goes into tinkering with expensive BMW software.
+1
Appreciate 0
      12-26-2007, 07:40 AM   #132
Garrett
Banned
23
Rep
1,356
Posts

Drives: 2004 330ci
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Mich

iTrader: (0)

Quote:
Originally Posted by AJ~ View Post
Garrett,

Why are you acting like this?

I have answered your "why" question already.

I stand by my opinion regarding the cost of the Dinan reflash, and judging by the responses, the opinion is shared by others.

Let it go.

-AJ


Link me WHERE you have explained this, I've just re-read this thread!
Appreciate 0
Closed Thread

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:41 AM.




1addicts
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
1Addicts.com, BIMMERPOST.com, E90Post.com, F30Post.com, M3Post.com, ZPost.com, 5Post.com, 6Post.com, 7Post.com, XBimmers.com logo and trademark are properties of BIMMERPOST