|
|
|
07-07-2017, 02:55 PM | #1 |
Lieutenant Colonel
912
Rep 1,850
Posts |
Rod bearings in N54 / N55 vs S85 / S65
So I did some calculations and it turns out the mean piston speed in a N54 / N55 is very close to the S65 / S85, as those M-engines trade stroke for RPM.
S65: stroke 75.2 mm rev limit 8,400 RPM MPS = (2* (75.2/1000) * 8400)/60 = 21.05 m/s N55: stroke 89.6 mm rev limit 7,000 RPM MPS = (2*(89.6/1000) * 7000)/60 = 20.90 m/s So why is there all this hubbub about rod bearings in higher mileage S65 / S85 engines, but not as much discussion for our engines? I will provide a few guesses off the top of my head, but I'm looking for informed opinions as mine are only amateur speculation: 1) S65 / S85 have been around for longer, so more examples have reached high mileage (maybe really marginally longer in the case of the S65 vs N54, though...actually, which was out first?) 2) On average, owners of S65 / S85 cars are probably more likely to do track days or other high impact use 3) S65 / S85 need to be revved high to make power so they encourage use at high RPM, N54 / N55 don't encourage this as much 4) Maybe S65 / S85 pistons are slightly heavier as a result of the larger bore? I have no idea if this is the case or not. What about the weight of the rods? |
07-07-2017, 03:11 PM | #2 |
1Addict
3233
Rep 7,894
Posts |
Interesting. I believe the 7k rev limiter on the N54/55 is set due to CFM limitations of the turbo. It's possible that turbos with efficient high rev flow could run to an 8k limit with the bore stroke, but then would see as many or more bearing failures?
Probably even more issues with HPFP and lean conditions leading to popped pistons and worn rectangrings. I haven't seen any weight specs on pistons/rods/crank/camshaft/sleeves etc for N54/N55/S65. Thoughts on the weight of the pistons alone, the S65 could be heavier, but then there's detail on the amount of material on the piston skirts, so they could even be lighter! Anyway...
__________________
|
Appreciate
0
|
07-07-2017, 03:15 PM | #3 |
Lieutenant Colonel
912
Rep 1,850
Posts |
Absolutely! For shits and giggles the car could physically stand to rev higher until you run into things like valve float and injector window limitations (not sure where those come into play for this car as it's not a VW or Honda so people don't do that kind of stuff for the most part) but as the stresses increase exponentially with increased RPM reliability would decrease fast the higher you raise it, and not just the bearings! Who knows what would fail first in that scenario. And of course with stock turbo it would make less and less power as you go up, due to flow limits.
|
Appreciate
0
|
07-07-2017, 03:46 PM | #4 | |
1Addict
3233
Rep 7,894
Posts |
Quote:
I've seen some built N54s with raised rev limiters. It's starting to come along. I'm not sure there's anyone out there that wants to try a 7500-8k rev limiter without reinforcing the bottom end. The crank on the I6 is too long compared to the V8 Couple threads on BB for you (replace the **): http://www.***********.com/showthrea...-N54-to-9k-rpm http://www.***********.com/showthrea...top-end-recipe
__________________
|
|
Appreciate
0
|
07-07-2017, 04:39 PM | #5 |
Lieutenant
425
Rep 545
Posts |
While engine speed is a factor, cylinder pressure is the main design factor when it comes to rod bearings. With the N54/55 being turbo engines, engineers knew that these bearings would typically be exposed to higher loads from the higher cylinder pressures of turbo engines. Because of this, the rod bearings were most likely designed with a more conservative safety factor. What high engine speed really causes problems with is wear at the piston ring/cylinder wall interface.
__________________
2011 BMW 135i ///M-Sport, DCT
Bilstein B12 kit, Dinan camber plates, M3 front control arms, Whiteline poly RSFB, MHD Stage 1, cp-e Charge Pipe, H&R Front sway bar, BMW performance diffuser |
Appreciate
1
ShocknAwe3232.50 |
07-07-2017, 04:45 PM | #6 |
Lieutenant Colonel
912
Rep 1,850
Posts |
Wow that's fascinating on those BB threads. Interesting info in both, but the first really got shitted up hard, so I'd need someone to tell me if he actually reached 9K lol.
Very interesting, but you'd figure safety margins with respect to stock power would be similar between the M and N engines...if anything you might expect the M series to have more margin! Of course, totally different deal if the engineers expect everyone to flash tune the turbos and increase torque by 30-50% or more...perhaps that's what's going on with our motors? |
Appreciate
0
|
07-07-2017, 04:55 PM | #7 |
Major
327
Rep 960
Posts |
Thought it was well documented the s65 and s85 bearing issues are down to a design problem. Too tight a clearance causing the oil not to film properly in the bearing, this is compounded by the use of 60 weight oil vs 30/40 weight on the n54/55.
|
Appreciate
0
|
07-07-2017, 04:56 PM | #8 |
Lieutenant
425
Rep 545
Posts |
Yeah that's a possibility...heck, BMW themselves released the PPK flash tune so they obviously knew there was plenty of margin to work with!
__________________
2011 BMW 135i ///M-Sport, DCT
Bilstein B12 kit, Dinan camber plates, M3 front control arms, Whiteline poly RSFB, MHD Stage 1, cp-e Charge Pipe, H&R Front sway bar, BMW performance diffuser |
Appreciate
0
|
07-07-2017, 05:14 PM | #10 | |
Major
327
Rep 960
Posts |
Quote:
one example but a Google search brings up heaps of results. Can't trust everything online but the general vibe is that there is an inherent issue with the s65 and s85 motors. |
|
Appreciate
0
|
07-07-2017, 06:03 PM | #11 | |
Lieutenant Colonel
912
Rep 1,850
Posts |
Quote:
I wonder how many people from the S65 design team got fired? |
|
Appreciate
0
|
07-07-2017, 08:59 PM | #12 |
Lieutenant
228
Rep 538
Posts |
There is way way way way more to the failure of s65 and s85 bushings than mean piston speed.
For the love of god please don't spread paranoia about rod bearings on the n5x. I had enough of it when I had my e90 m3! |
Appreciate
0
|
07-07-2017, 09:27 PM | #13 |
Major
747
Rep 1,119
Posts |
Do a quick google search. N55 rod failures are common enough to make me worry
|
Appreciate
0
|
07-07-2017, 09:47 PM | #14 | |
Lieutenant Colonel
912
Rep 1,850
Posts |
Quote:
I did a quick google search and didn't find much. I've seen a couple spun bearings and freak rod issues. The rods can bend with bad tuning, the bearing issues may be a freak accident or oiling related, maybe due to the pump sucking air under hard cornering with sticky tires. After all the car does have a wet sump. I don't think those are common failures on the N55, though. |
|
Appreciate
0
|
07-07-2017, 10:51 PM | #15 | |
Major
327
Rep 960
Posts |
Quote:
I personally don't think n5x bearing failures are any more common then any other make or model (Google honda rod bearing or suburu rod bearing and you probably get more results) biggest cause of bearing failures is oil starvation running the car with next to no oil or oil that's the wrong grade/type and/or passed its use by date. 25k km intervals and a mechanic that says he changed the oil but really didn't is a quick way to kill a motor. Stick to a decent interval, change the oil yourself with the correct grade and type and you'll be fine. |
|
Appreciate
1
The Wind Breezes911.50 |
07-08-2017, 10:02 AM | #16 | ||
Lieutenant
228
Rep 538
Posts |
Quote:
Quote:
However if you really look at the failure rate of the s65 due to spun bearings it was still fairly low, like under 3%. So while there certainly is an issue with those bearings it wasn't as bad as people made it out to be. In a nutshell, many many times more N5x sold than s65. However forums/Google searches yield less results about beasring failure in N5x. In the end s65 failure rate was still pretty low, ergo N5x rod bearing failure rate is way less than that. So much so I would suggest it is a non issue, and is on the same order of any other failure mode of the engine like a dead oil pump or a snapped rod or something. It's a piece of machinery after all and it's not flawless. Last edited by WhatsADSM; 07-08-2017 at 10:07 AM.. |
||
Appreciate
1
The Wind Breezes911.50 |
07-10-2017, 08:33 AM | #17 |
1Addict
3233
Rep 7,894
Posts |
Good thing to keep in mind is that these cars CAN suffer from oil starvation issues on the track. Off the top of my head I believe most of the major failures have either been linked to oil starvation, or appallingly bad tuning. A couple due to injectors leaking A LOT over a long time to dilute the oil. A few with guys trying to push 800+ on stock internals. Shit happens. Don't think I'd get all bent over it.
__________________
|
Appreciate
0
|
Post Reply |
Bookmarks |
|
|