|
|
|
04-27-2008, 03:44 PM | #23 |
Captain
35
Rep 602
Posts |
^^^
Ya I know what you're all saying. Although, I'm pretty sure the guy in the M thought he had a chance, haha. He was all serious and had that "look" LOL In term of the SL600 running low 12's at a track, last time I checked 0.5-1 sec. difference is about 1/2 car length? That's not a pull by any means and that's why I'm not overly surprised that in this situation the 135 wasn't in this guy's rear review. |
Appreciate
0
|
04-27-2008, 05:20 PM | #24 |
Car'a'carn
473
Rep 751
Posts |
whenever a biker revs at me i just laugh.. im thinking no way I'm gonna waste my gas haha
|
Appreciate
0
|
04-28-2008, 08:38 AM | #27 |
Captain
35
Rep 602
Posts |
^^
Well, I think the SL is going to be faster, in the 1.4 mile & a "longer haul", but not more than 1 car length especially in the 1/4 - so what's that in a "longer haul", 1.5-2 secs difference? That's not enough to be seeing the 135 in the rear view. |
Appreciate
0
|
04-28-2008, 03:30 PM | #29 |
Captain
35
Rep 602
Posts |
^^^
Ya weight is the biggest factor. Prime example is the lotus exige. 200hp car, but 4.7 sec 0-60. Have you seen mag articles where they take a stock crap car (civic, escorts etc) and take almost everything out including frame and body panels - that car drop seconds instantly. |
Appreciate
0
|
04-28-2008, 04:03 PM | #30 | |
Lieutenant Colonel
42
Rep 1,756
Posts |
Quote:
|
|
Appreciate
0
|
04-28-2008, 04:14 PM | #31 | |
Second Lieutenant
8
Rep 252
Posts |
Quote:
Amen dude. F street bikes.
__________________
Titanium Silver
6 speed man Black Boston Leather Gray Poplar Trim Nav system Comfort access Power/Heated seats Sattelite radio Ipod Production number 398**** |
|
Appreciate
0
|
Post Reply |
Bookmarks |
|
|