|
|
|
|
Post Reply |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
09-06-2017, 07:06 PM | #1 |
Lieutenant
101
Rep 413
Posts |
M3 front control arms VS adjustable front camber plates, which is better?
I've read a lot of threads and haven't found this particular subject discussed. I have read a lot of threads where people seem to automatically go for the M3 front control arm swap, but I have read of some people running into tire rubbing issues which makes sense since the M3 control arms just push the tire further outboard, resulting in added camber. I'm wondering if the M3 control arms would be better than adjustable camber plates. I mainly use my car as a DD but my wife and I auto-cross the car whenever we can. I currently have the Ground Control "Street" adjustable camber plates with OEM control arms and am wondering if I should upgrade the control arms this winter? Anyone have information that would help me decide? Below is my current setup.
Front: OEM control arms E93 M3 sway bar Ground Control adjustable camber plates Swift Spec R springs Koni SA adjustable shocks Rear: OEM control arms Swift Spec R springs Koni SA adjustable shocks (from tc kline) WhiteLine RSFB inserts - would like to replace with a more solid bushing. My goal is to make the car respond and handle better and I already handle the added NVH from the camber plates so a little more won't phase me.
__________________
Jim
2011 135i DCT - FBO PS2 1Mpostr Last edited by JPuehl; 09-06-2017 at 07:12 PM.. |
09-06-2017, 07:56 PM | #2 |
Private First Class
82
Rep 131
Posts
Drives: 10 135i
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Manchester, NH
|
The M3 arms will add some positive caster (my car was 7.4 degrees measured after install). Positive caster will increase dynamic negative camber on the outside tire when cornering, generally a desired effect. As far as rubbing goes, the wheel will "sit" a little forward in the wheel arch so if you are running taller sidewalls than factory you may run into rubbing at full lock. At factory sidewall and near factory sidewall heights I did not experience any significant rubbing.
|
Appreciate
1
BimmerAg425.00 |
09-06-2017, 08:27 PM | #3 | |
Lieutenant
101
Rep 413
Posts |
Quote:
|
|
Appreciate
0
|
09-06-2017, 09:02 PM | #4 | ||
Private First Class
82
Rep 131
Posts
Drives: 10 135i
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Manchester, NH
|
Quote:
No doubt your camber is improving your contact patch under load. Generally speaking though, caster + camber will improve overall suspension geometry thus increasing your contact patch beyond what camber alone can produce. Too much of either is bad for a number of different reasons, but a balance of each is more ideal for most applications. It's a complimentary relationship. |
||
Appreciate
1
BimmerAg425.00 |
09-06-2017, 10:19 PM | #5 |
Lieutenant
101
Rep 413
Posts |
Thanks. I was going to post that moving the tire forward does have the benefit of adding a little caster, but you beat me to it. Thanks again for the response.
|
Appreciate
0
|
09-15-2017, 11:39 AM | #6 |
First Lieutenant
219
Rep 361
Posts |
The M control arm is desirable as it is a simple bolt on mod that both adds camber (good) and replaces the sloppy fluid bushing with a more firm rubber one (good). The camber plate is ultimately necessary either in addition to or instead of for a track/autocross car as the M control arm isn't nearly enough on its own to assist with tire fitment or provide the desired levels of camber.
If my car was purely a daily driver, I think I'd have the Dinan fixed plates plus the M arms - that combo I believe would give me about -2 degrees camber without the drawbacks of camber plates (maintenance, noise, and cost). But if you intend to autocross, you will need at least -3 degrees camber to make the car not terrible. In my opinion, I think you would see a much bigger gain overall from 1) setting camber to maximum on the plates 2) adding the largest front wheel and tire that you can fit. The next step is to replace the Koni/Swift combo with coilovers so you can tune your spring rates to both make the car handle better and optimize your wheel/tire fitment even better. You should be working towards an 8.5" wheel and 245 front tire on the car. -Mark
__________________
2011 BMW 128i - Check out my STX build thread!
|
Appreciate
0
|
09-22-2017, 11:23 AM | #7 | |
Lieutenant
101
Rep 413
Posts |
Quote:
__________________
Jim
2011 135i DCT - FBO PS2 1Mpostr |
|
Appreciate
1
Dr182.00 |
10-13-2017, 08:47 PM | #8 |
Supreme Galactic Commander (one galaxy over...)
650
Rep 1,771
Posts |
FYI, I have -2.2 with just the Dinan camber plates. Will move up to the M3 bits next season if I start chewing up the outsides of tires again...
__________________
Best,
Andy '12 E82-PS2,Stoptechs,Clubsports+M3 bits,Accusump,Wagner DP+EVO III FMIC,ERCP,BMS Intake,Mason Strut Bar,Wedge Tune |
Appreciate
0
|
Post Reply |
Bookmarks |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|