BMW 1 Series Coupe Forum / 1 Series Convertible Forum (1M / tii / 135i / 128i / Coupe / Cabrio / Hatchback) (BMW E82 E88 128i 130i 135i)
 





 

Post Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
      07-15-2018, 04:59 PM   #45
Lups
...
Lups's Avatar
10295
Rep
14,597
Posts

Drives: I don't own a car.
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: Lost as usual

iTrader: (0)

Quote:
Originally Posted by bbbbmw View Post
His lawyers said he's being held in solitary - which would make one think (Mueller's) prosecution is leaning on him, to force him (and perhaps others) to cooperate, vs. simply administering justice - which was the point of the post I replied to.

However, in digging a bit more, it appears that "solitary" just means he's kept by himself, vs. in a 12x8 cell in "the hole." So that's likely just lawyering...
Mannie called his conditions vip rate. He even got to keep his obstruction shit going on from the cell. He got to wear his own clothes even.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by Joekerr View Post
You're still a little new here, so I'll let you in on a little secret. Whenever Lups types gibberish, this is an opportunity for you to imagine it to be whatever you'd like it to be.
Appreciate 0
      07-15-2018, 06:03 PM   #46
gonzo
Lieutenant General
gonzo's Avatar
United_States
2971
Rep
10,604
Posts

Drives: as many as possible
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: TeXXXas

iTrader: (0)

I felt compelled to post this.

https://medium.com/@markfmccarty/mue...s-5406ef955406

Answer? Yes. They know idiots when they see them. Attention spans of gnats and the memory recall of moths.

Just like the 13 Russian indictments...when asked for evidence for defense prep, Mueller said 'No can do'.
Oh, okay. Sounds reasonable.
Same case here with new indictments.
The show must go on!

Sharp as marbles, some of you are. Not much has changed on here.
Keep that RUSSIA narrative in the air!

We're so glad you could attend, come inside, come inside.
__________________
Crazy Diamond
Appreciate 2
bbbbmw2035.00
glennQNYC1297.50

      07-15-2018, 06:50 PM   #47
Real Dodger
On Ceti Alpha V
Real Dodger's Avatar
United_States
2564
Rep
3,163
Posts

Drives: 135i DCT
Join Date: May 2017
Location: Frisco

iTrader: (0)

Garage List
2012 135  [5.00]
Quote:
Originally Posted by gonzo View Post
I felt compelled to post this.

https://medium.com/@markfmccarty/mue...s-5406ef955406

Answer? Yes. They know idiots when they see them. Attention spans of gnats and the memory recall of moths.

Just like the 13 Russian indictments...when asked for evidence for defense prep, Mueller said 'No can do'.
Oh, okay. Sounds reasonable.
Same case here with new indictments.
The show must go on!

Sharp as marbles, some of you are. Not much has changed on here.
Keep that RUSSIA narrative in the air!

We're so glad you could attend, come inside, come inside.
He's an idiot. Pushing conspiracy theories. We get to see "under the hood" of where gonzo gets his views.

https://medium.com/@markfmccarty
__________________
Musica est etiam magna Si tu es vetulae
Appreciate 0
      07-15-2018, 08:00 PM   #48
Real Dodger
On Ceti Alpha V
Real Dodger's Avatar
United_States
2564
Rep
3,163
Posts

Drives: 135i DCT
Join Date: May 2017
Location: Frisco

iTrader: (0)

Garage List
2012 135  [5.00]
Quote:
Originally Posted by Real Dodger View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by gonzo View Post
I felt compelled to post this.

https://medium.com/@markfmccarty/mue...s-5406ef955406

Answer? Yes. They know idiots when they see them. Attention spans of gnats and the memory recall of moths.

Just like the 13 Russian indictments...when asked for evidence for defense prep, Mueller said 'No can do'.
Oh, okay. Sounds reasonable.
Same case here with new indictments.
The show must go on!

Sharp as marbles, some of you are. Not much has changed on here.
Keep that RUSSIA narrative in the air!

We're so glad you could attend, come inside, come inside.
He's an idiot. Pushing conspiracy theories. We get to see "under the hood" of where gonzo gets his views.

https://medium.com/@markfmccarty
I got to be very straightforward here, the more I read articles from this guy, the more nauseated I become. What an absolute idiotic ass! How can anybody credibly follow this guy?!?
__________________
Musica est etiam magna Si tu es vetulae
Appreciate 0
      07-16-2018, 12:21 AM   #49
Mingwan
Captain
615
Rep
693
Posts

Drives: Beastly
Join Date: Jan 2015
Location: Kansas

iTrader: (0)

Is Mark McCarthy a reliable/credible source?
Appreciate 1
      07-16-2018, 06:17 PM   #50
gonzo
Lieutenant General
gonzo's Avatar
United_States
2971
Rep
10,604
Posts

Drives: as many as possible
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: TeXXXas

iTrader: (0)

I'll save a few key strokes for several of you. They are rated left to far left leaning.

https://www.truthdig.com/articles/in...political-act/

The show must go on!
__________________
Crazy Diamond
Appreciate 1
glennQNYC1297.50

      07-16-2018, 06:30 PM   #51
Real Dodger
On Ceti Alpha V
Real Dodger's Avatar
United_States
2564
Rep
3,163
Posts

Drives: 135i DCT
Join Date: May 2017
Location: Frisco

iTrader: (0)

Garage List
2012 135  [5.00]
Quote:
Originally Posted by gonzo View Post
I'll save a few key strokes for several of you. They are rated left to far left leaning.

https://www.truthdig.com/articles/in...political-act/

The show must go on!
I hope they are more honest than Mark F...
__________________
Musica est etiam magna Si tu es vetulae
Appreciate 0
      07-17-2018, 03:44 PM   #52
glennQNYC
Space Force Door Gunner
glennQNYC's Avatar
United_States
1298
Rep
2,672
Posts

Drives: M Sport 335i
Join Date: May 2013
Location: North Jersey

iTrader: (0)

Garage List
2014 335i  [4.87]
Post

Andrew McCarthy had another excellent piece yesterday that is relevant to this thread. Quotes contained below (with my emphasis added) with original story available at the link.


Quote:
So, is Russia now presumed innocent of hacking the 2016 election?

If not, it is difficult to understand any proper purpose served by Special Counsel Robert Mueller’s indictment of twelve military officers in the Kremlin’s intelligence services for doing what everybody in America already knew that they did, and has known since before Donald Trump took office — indeed, since before the 2016 election.

Make no mistake: This is nakedly politicized law enforcement. There is absolutely no chance any of the Russian officials charged will ever see the inside of an American courtroom. The indictment is a strictly political document by which the special counsel seeks to justify the existence of his superfluous investigation.

Oh, and by the way, the answer to the question posed above is, “Yes, it is now the official position of the United States that Russia gets our Constitution’s benefit of the doubt.” Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein announced during the Friday the 13th indictment: “In our justice system, everyone who is charged with a crime is presumed innocent unless proven guilty.”

Of course, the indicted Russians are never going to be proven guilty — not in the courtroom sense Rosenstein was invoking.

As is so often the case in today’s politicized Justice Department, Rosenstein was trying to make a different political point. As he went on to note, if people whom we have formally charged are presumed innocent, then, a fortiori, people who have not been accused — implicitly, Rosenstein was talking about President Trump — must also be presumed innocent. But, see, you can’t make that point without stepping on the political purpose of Friday’s charade: We have taken the not only pointless but reckless step of indicting operatives of a hostile foreign power who cannot be prosecuted and whose schemes could easily have been exposed — and, in fact, have been exposed, multiple times — in public government reports; so now, due-process rules oblige us to caution you that we must presume the Russians did not do what we have formally accused them of doing. They are entitled to that presumption unless and until we convict them in court . . . which is never going to happen.

Rosenstein made another telling remark at his big press conference. The Justice Department, he explained, will now “transition responsibility for this case to our Department’s National Security Division while we await the apprehension of the defendants.”

Now, stop giggling over that last part — the bit where we hold our breath until Russian dictator Vladimir Putin extradites his spies into the FBI’s waiting arms. I’m talking about the first part: Mueller’s case, the definitive case about what Russia did to interfere in the 2016 election, is no longer Mueller’s case. It is being “transitioned” — i.e., buried — in the Justice Department unit that deals with counterintelligence matters that do not result in public trials.

This underscores what we have been arguing here since before Mueller was appointed: There was no need and no basis in federal regulations for a special counsel.

A special counsel is supposed to be appointed only when there are (a) a concrete factual basis to believe federally prosecutable crimes have been committed, calling for a criminal investigation, and (b) a conflict of interest that prevents the Justice Department from conducting the criminal investigation.


As we’ve observed countless times, there was no basis for a criminal investigation of President Trump or the Trump campaign. The fact that Russia interfered in an American election — as it routinely does — never meant that the perceived beneficiary of the interference was criminally complicit in it. There is no known evidence that Trump-campaign officials had any involvement in hacking by the Russian intelligence services. Mueller’s new indictment powerfully suggests that this could not have happened — the Russians were expert in their cyberespionage tactics, they did not need anyone’s help, and they took pains to conceal their identity from everyone with whom they dealt.

Moreover, even though Trump-campaign officials have been charged with other crimes (having nothing to do with the 2016 election), and some of those Trump officials had “contacts” with Russians, Mueller has never charged one of them with a crime related to Russia’s espionage attack on the election, nor has he ever elicited from any defendant who pled guilty an admission of any such crime. The only known allegations of such a crime are contained in the unverified, Clinton-campaign-sponsored Steele dossier, and the Trump-campaign figures implicated in it have either not been charged at all (e.g., Carter Page, Michael Cohen), or not been charged with a “collusion” crime (Paul Manafort).

Thus, among the worst aspects of Mueller’s new indictment is its continuation of the Justice Department’s politicized perversion of its critical counterintelligence mission.

Lacking the requisite basis to conduct a criminal investigation, the Justice Department used its counterintelligence mission as a pretext for appointing a special counsel. This was grossly improper: (1) Counterintelligence work, which is geared at thwarting the operations of hostile foreign powers, is not the prosecutor work of building criminal cases; (2) not surprisingly, then, there is no authority in the regulations to assign a special counsel to a counterintelligence investigation; and (3) because counterintelligence authorities do not afford Americans the due-process protections required in criminal investigations, the Justice Department is not permitted to use counterintelligence as a pretext for conducting what is actually an effort to build a criminal prosecution.

The only point of the new indictment is to justify Rosenstein’s decision and Mueller’s existence. Proponents of the unnecessary special counsel want to say, “See, we really needed this investigation.” But that can be said with a straight face only if the goalposts are moved.

To be clear, we did need an FBI counterintelligence investigation of Russia’s espionage operation against the 2016 election, and we already had a quite aggressive one before Mueller came on the scene. But we would have needed a special-counsel investigation only if there had been a concrete factual basis to believe the Trump campaign conspired in Russia’s espionage operation against the 2016 election.

There never was. So now, the purported need for Mueller is being rationalized on two fictitious premises.

The first is that the new indictment shows we needed Mueller to get to the bottom of Russia’s perfidy. This is false: There is nothing new in Mueller’s indictment, his participation was unnecessary to discover what our counterintelligence investigators have learned, and the intelligence they have gathered should not have been put in an indictment — aggression by hostile foreign powers is not a law-enforcement issue, and it is a mockery of the justice system to charge foreign aggressors and pretend we presume them innocent of their attacks against our country.

The second is that the number of indictments Mueller has generated proves that there were solid grounds to suspect Trump-campaign “collusion” in Russia’s election-meddling. The blatant, partisan dishonesty of this claim is best encapsulated in this passage from the Washington Post’s report on Mueller’s new indictment:

Mueller and a team of prosecutors have been working since May 2017 to determine whether any Trump associates conspired with Russia to interfere in the election. With the new indictment, his office has filed charges against 32 people on crimes including hacking, money laundering and lying to the FBI.

The Post goes on grudgingly to point out that 26 of the 32 charged are Russians “who are unlikely to ever be put on trial in the United States.” (Unlikely?) But the paper conveniently omits mention of the fact that none of the 32 have been charged with a Trump–Russia conspiracy to interfere in the election. That’s the only thing Mueller was needed for.

As I pointed out on Twitter over the weekend, besides the two-dozen-odd Kremlin operatives already charged, there are 144 million other people in Russia who will never see the inside of an American courtroom. If Mueller indicts every one of them, his stats will look really impressive . . . and there will still be no Trump conspiracy against the election.

What there will be, though, is a new international order in which nation-states are encouraged to file criminal charges against each other’s officials for actions deemed to be provocative (or, more accurately, actions that can be exploited for domestic political purposes). Of all government officials in the world, American officials are the most active on the global stage — and that includes meddling in other countries’ elections. I doubt our diplomats, intelligence operatives, elected officials, and citizens will much like living in the world Robert Mueller and Rod Rosenstein have given us. If the idea was to give Vladimir Putin and his thug regime a new way to sabotage the United States, nice work.
__________________
Appreciate 0
      07-17-2018, 07:59 PM   #53
BimmerBoomer
demoted
BimmerBoomer's Avatar
Canada
145
Rep
796
Posts

Drives: 2018 Audi S5 Sportback
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Grimsby, Ontario

iTrader: (0)

CNN is confirming my initial speculation...

The White House was told about the indictments on the Monday and given the option to hold off on the announcement until after the summit. On Tuesday Rosenstein was given the all clear to go ahead before the summit.
Appreciate 1
Post Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:31 AM.




1addicts
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.0
Copyright ©2000 - 2018, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
1Addicts.com, BIMMERPOST.com, E90Post.com, F30Post.com, M3Post.com, ZPost.com, 5Post.com, 6Post.com, 7Post.com, XBimmers.com logo and trademark are properties of BIMMERPOST