09-09-2011, 01:38 PM | #23 | |
Brigadier General
183
Rep 3,939
Posts |
Again, you're emphasizing how much worse the Audi runs in humid/hot temps compared to the BMW; this is about how much better the BMW reacts to cooler temps than the Audi. You're looking at it backwards. We all know hot temps can make cars run like crap, some more than others.
Quote:
|
|
Appreciate
0
|
09-09-2011, 07:42 PM | #24 | |
Brigadier General
2391
Rep 3,533
Posts |
Cooling compressed air /= compressing cooled air. IMO before & after the turbo are very different subjects.
Quote:
Just to be sure, you believe that a FI engine is not very affected by less dense air, but greatly affected by more dense air? By this logic, taking a FI car from the coast to Denver wouldn't cause a huge drop in power, but taking a FI car from Denver to the coast would cause a big gain? Can you see why I think these two things are opposite of each other? The term "relativity" comes to mind. |
|
Appreciate
0
|
09-09-2011, 09:36 PM | #25 |
Second Lieutenant
7
Rep 232
Posts |
A Turbocharged or supercharged engine will have less variation in power with changing conditions (altitude or temp) than a naturally aspirated engine.
The NA engine can only fill its cylinder with the ambient air density. The turbocharger or supercharger will create a higher density charge than NA. It is also using a boost control providing a more consistent charge to the cylinder thus less variation in power.
__________________
13 Subaru BRZ, WR Blue, 6M
09 BMW135i, Alpine White, Sport, 6M - sold 99 BMW M roadster, Estoril Blue - sold |
Appreciate
0
|
Post Reply |
Bookmarks |
|
|