BMW Garage BMW Meets Register Today's Posts




 

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
      03-25-2012, 08:44 AM   #1
h-manuk
Private
h-manuk's Avatar
United Kingdom
37
Rep
223
Posts

Drives: BSM 1M Coupe
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: UK

iTrader: (0)

Impressive conversion

http://www.1addicts.com/forums/showthread.php?t=662836
Appreciate 0
      03-25-2012, 08:50 AM   #2
1M SUSI
Second Lieutenant
1M SUSI's Avatar
United_States
44
Rep
213
Posts

Drives: 2011 //1M Alpine White
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Connecticuts Gold Coast

iTrader: (0)

Oh and now he converted it into a "real" m car.
Appreciate 0
      03-25-2012, 08:58 AM   #3
Harlequin
Brigadier General
Harlequin's Avatar
Australia
331
Rep
4,021
Posts

Drives: F32 Coupé
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Brisbane, Australia BMW Club QLD Member

iTrader: (5)

Garage List
That dude's a member here... It's been on the front page for a week or more...

I don't think he or anyone else has said there or elsewhere that it's now a "real ///M car"... Tall Poppy much?
__________________
Appreciate 0
      03-25-2012, 09:05 AM   #4
RaihaX
Major General
RaihaX's Avatar
Australia
156
Rep
4,995
Posts

Drives: 08' 135i
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Australia, Perth

iTrader: (2)

Welcome to last week
Appreciate 0
      03-25-2012, 09:06 AM   #5
Powerbeast
Lieutenant General
Powerbeast's Avatar
United_States
5408
Rep
10,825
Posts

Drives: F80 M3 RarriRot
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: SoCal

iTrader: (4)

Repost and in no way is it a "real M"
Appreciate 0
      03-25-2012, 09:38 AM   #6
h-manuk
Private
h-manuk's Avatar
United Kingdom
37
Rep
223
Posts

Drives: BSM 1M Coupe
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: UK

iTrader: (0)

Doh.....so not on it
Appreciate 0
      03-25-2012, 09:51 AM   #7
m3kerry
SCCA B Street
m3kerry's Avatar
United_States
117
Rep
660
Posts

Drives: 1 M
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Dallas

iTrader: (0)

Is this a down grade? Is the car better with a v8 then just tuning the 6? Not
trying to troll.
Appreciate 0
      03-25-2012, 09:54 AM   #8
Pete_vB
Captain
Pete_vB's Avatar
United_States
118
Rep
898
Posts

Drives: '69 GT3, GT4, 1M, 912
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: SF Bay Area, Shenzhen, Oman

iTrader: (0)

Quote:
Originally Posted by m3kerry View Post
Is this a down grade? Is the car better with a v8 then just tuning the 6? Not
trying to troll.
Upgrade IMHO. I'd trade the 8 kg or whatever it is for that throttle response.
__________________
1M, GT4, 1969 Porsche 911 w/ 997 GT3 Cup Motor (435hp & 2,100 lbs)
Appreciate 0
      03-25-2012, 10:36 AM   #9
MrRoboto
Brigadier General
Canada
1846
Rep
4,836
Posts

Drives: VO 1M
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Canada

iTrader: (0)

A fool and his money. What would you guys buy with 150k?
Appreciate 0
      03-25-2012, 10:45 AM   #10
larryn
Lieutenant General
United_States
2146
Rep
10,176
Posts

Drives: '97 332ti, '21 X5 45e, '16 GT4
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Seattle

iTrader: (2)

Quote:
Originally Posted by Powerbeast View Post
Repost and in no way is it a "real M"
It has a real M engine and drivetrain and real M suspension. The 1M only has half of that equation.

That being said, I call my transplant car a 332ti for a reason, even though the diff and suspension that I have in it are better than a stock e36 M3's... and it has the interior and rest of the drivetrain as an M3.
Appreciate 0
      03-25-2012, 11:08 AM   #11
MrRoboto
Brigadier General
Canada
1846
Rep
4,836
Posts

Drives: VO 1M
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Canada

iTrader: (0)

Quote:
Originally Posted by larryn View Post
It has a real M engine and drivetrain and real M suspension. The 1M only has half of that equation.

That being said, I call my transplant car a 332ti for a reason, even though the diff and suspension that I have in it are better than a stock e36 M3's... and it has the interior and rest of the drivetrain as an M3.
Give it a rest larry.
Appreciate 0
      03-25-2012, 11:26 AM   #12
Pete_vB
Captain
Pete_vB's Avatar
United_States
118
Rep
898
Posts

Drives: '69 GT3, GT4, 1M, 912
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: SF Bay Area, Shenzhen, Oman

iTrader: (0)

Quote:
Originally Posted by larryn View Post
It has a real M engine and drivetrain and real M suspension. The 1M only has half of that equation.
Badge snob much?

The 1M is proving crushingly faster than the M3 in many forms of competition. They are both A stock cars in SCCA, and the M3 likely is something over a second slower on the average course. I'll take the "fake" M engine and the better chassis any day of the week, thanks.
__________________
1M, GT4, 1969 Porsche 911 w/ 997 GT3 Cup Motor (435hp & 2,100 lbs)
Appreciate 0
      03-25-2012, 11:53 AM   #13
135IS
Captain
Canada
33
Rep
740
Posts

Drives: 09 LMB 135I / AW 1M
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: t.o

iTrader: (1)

Garage List
2009 135i  [7.00]
Quote:
Originally Posted by Powerbeast View Post
Repost and in no way is it a "real M"
the 1M is not a real m either...
__________________
LMB 135i: Gone
AW 1M: Current #211 of 220
Appreciate 0
      03-25-2012, 12:34 PM   #14
larryn
Lieutenant General
United_States
2146
Rep
10,176
Posts

Drives: '97 332ti, '21 X5 45e, '16 GT4
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Seattle

iTrader: (2)

Quote:
Originally Posted by Pete_vB View Post
Badge snob much?

The 1M is proving crushingly faster than the M3 in many forms of competition. They are both A stock cars in SCCA, and the M3 likely is something over a second slower on the average course. I'll take the "fake" M engine and the better chassis any day of the week, thanks.
LOL. Selective quote much? And your comment doesn't even make sense against the quote.

I am about as unbadgesnobbish as a person can get. Like it or not. The text you selected is the absolute unequivocal truth. Stop reading into alternate meanings. You would be incorrect.

Edit: I get it.. You see the new addition to my garage. That has nothing to do with the comment. I go on to say that I have a similar transplant car, and also do not consider it ///M badge material either.

FWIW, the 1M is a ballsy car, and I was not slamming it, just saying that the quote "not a real M car" is throwing stones in a glass house...and poking fun at a member who's gone thru a lot to make an amazing car, only to get slammed by ridiculously petty comment.

Last edited by larryn; 03-25-2012 at 12:42 PM..
Appreciate 0
      03-25-2012, 01:01 PM   #15
Pete_vB
Captain
Pete_vB's Avatar
United_States
118
Rep
898
Posts

Drives: '69 GT3, GT4, 1M, 912
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: SF Bay Area, Shenzhen, Oman

iTrader: (0)

Quote:
Originally Posted by larryn View Post
LOL. Selective quote much? And your comment doesn't even make sense against the quote.
First, quoting your first paragraph isn't selective quoting. You made a point I responded to.

Quote:
Originally Posted by larryn View Post
The text you selected is the absolute unequivocal truth. Stop reading into alternate meanings. You would be incorrect.
Second, no, it is not the truth that it's not a M motor. The truth is simple- BMW decides what an M is. They say the 1M motor is an M- says so right on the motor. Some people think they know better, because it wasn't made by so-and-so, shares too much in common with non M cars.. So they don't like BMW's answer, and make a big deal about it. Which is why I mention badge snobbery. Fine, but it according to BMW it still doesn't make them right...

My point is simple. I could care less if they call it an M. It's clearly often faster and rated better than the other cars they do call M, which is what matters to me. For this guy's conversion, maybe BMW didn't call it an M, but who gives a damn? The thing, if it's done well, would rock plan and simple, regardless of what it's called.
__________________
1M, GT4, 1969 Porsche 911 w/ 997 GT3 Cup Motor (435hp & 2,100 lbs)
Appreciate 0
      03-25-2012, 01:24 PM   #16
ESC OFF
Major
ESC OFF's Avatar
40
Rep
1,058
Posts

Drives: 1M, CaymanS, 914, 500 Abarth
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Chicago

iTrader: (0)

great...another pissing match.
It's a good thing Indy Car in St Pete is going on right now...oh wait they're driving V6 turbos now not V8's...I guess they're not real Indy Cars either...
__________________
The faster you go, the better it feels
Appreciate 0
      03-25-2012, 01:26 PM   #17
larryn
Lieutenant General
United_States
2146
Rep
10,176
Posts

Drives: '97 332ti, '21 X5 45e, '16 GT4
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Seattle

iTrader: (2)

Pete, I am not going down a "not an M motor" path. It's irrelevant to the topic, and we have differing opinions. That's okay.

Regarding your second paragraph, we are in complete agreement. For powerbeast's comment, it was a shitty thing to singularly say. 'Nuf said.
Appreciate 0
      03-25-2012, 01:35 PM   #18
mPlasticDesign
Major General
mPlasticDesign's Avatar
684
Rep
5,069
Posts

Drives: BMW 230i Msport w/LSD
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Astral Projecting: ∞ 23.516 -122 02.625 0242.101 ĕv'rē-hwâr'

iTrader: (16)

Garage List
Quote:
Originally Posted by Harlequin View Post
....I don't think....anyone else has said there or elsewhere that it's now a "real ///M car"... Tall Poppy much?
Read the other thread. There are several "NOW that's a 'real' M car!" and most coming from 135 owners not M3 owners. Kinda like this comment in this thread:

Quote:
Originally Posted by 135IS View Post
the 1M is not a real m either...

Quote:
Originally Posted by Pete_vB View Post
The 1M is proving crushingly faster than the M3 in many forms of competition. They are both A stock cars in SCCA, and the M3 likely is something over a second slower on the average course. I'll take the "fake" M engine and the better chassis any day of the week, thanks.
+1

I'm not sure I would trade the 1M engine for the S65. I lived with both the S54 and S65 for 3yrs each. The 1M has crazy power.

Do I think this conversion is kick ass? Yes I do! Would I have still bought the 1M if it had the S65? Of course. But I don't feel cheated in any way with what the M Group has done with the N54.
__________________
Appreciate 0
      03-25-2012, 01:54 PM   #19
Artemis
Moderator
Artemis's Avatar
29278
Rep
13,090
Posts

Drives: BMW M2 Competition
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Belgium

iTrader: (0)

Quote:
Originally Posted by Pete_vB View Post
no, it is not the truth that it's not a M motor. The truth is simple - BMW decides what an M is. They say the 1M motor is an M - says so right on the motor. Some people think they know better, because it wasn't made by so-and-so, shares too much in common with non M cars. So they don't like BMW's answer, and make a big deal about it.
Message to all disbelievers and doubters: feel free to take the ///M paternity test: first drive the 1M to bits and then let's talk again.
__________________
///M is art Artemis
Appreciate 0
      03-25-2012, 02:24 PM   #20
m3kerry
SCCA B Street
m3kerry's Avatar
United_States
117
Rep
660
Posts

Drives: 1 M
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Dallas

iTrader: (0)

Quote:
Originally Posted by Pete_vB View Post
Badge snob much?

The 1M is proving crushingly faster than the M3 in many forms of competition. They are both A stock cars in SCCA, and the M3 likely is something over a second slower on the average course. I'll take the "fake" M engine and the better chassis any day of the week, thanks.
Let me assure that the e90 is no where near the 1m in autox. Now, I don't know about the track but autox is the 1m's play ground.
Appreciate 0
      03-25-2012, 03:22 PM   #21
ozinaldo
Brigadier General
ozinaldo's Avatar
Portugal
116
Rep
3,070
Posts

Drives: 1M
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Lisbon, Portugal

iTrader: (0)

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mr.Metak2you View Post
Read the other thread. There are several "NOW that's a 'real' M car!" and most coming from 135 owners not M3 owners. Kinda like this comment in this thread:

+1

I'm not sure I would trade the 1M engine for the S65. I lived with both the S54 and S65 for 3yrs each. The 1M has crazy power.

Do I think this conversion is kick ass? Yes I do! Would I have still bought the 1M if it had the S65? Of course. But I don't feel cheated in any way with what the M Group has done with the N54.

Totally agree with all that. Plus, people can go to that thread and see how that was abused extensively pages and pages by the same people who keep on looking for any opportunity to "1M is not a real M" bs, even after everything this car has prooved in so many occasions, that is just out of this world kind of prejudice for me.

Every 1M owner on that thread was saying just good things about that conversion, congratulating the OP including me but somehow we all were labeled as "haters" anyway. I rarely have blog discussions, am too old and busy for that kind of waste, but had a one little war of words and kind of enjoyed it since the opponent had to reveal what he is made of at the end, this is all on the last pages of that thread and could be read by anyone just for fun or in order to understand how deep it goes this prejudice.

They didn't even get the point that the converted car was equally close to a M3 too however for some reason no one told that "now this is how a real M3 should be", I guess a taboo is a taboo, and even if BMW puts real pure bred race horses (2 of them) in front of their next M3 instead of an engine, people will just continue worshipping, saying that how organic the new car is riding!
Appreciate 0
Closed Thread

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:02 PM.




1addicts
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
1Addicts.com, BIMMERPOST.com, E90Post.com, F30Post.com, M3Post.com, ZPost.com, 5Post.com, 6Post.com, 7Post.com, XBimmers.com logo and trademark are properties of BIMMERPOST